Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T11:00:58.864Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Screening and diagnostic imaging at centres performing congenital heart surgery in middle-income countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2022

Amara Majeed*
Affiliation:
Departments of Cardiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA Boston Children’s Hospital, and Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
Kathy Jenkins
Affiliation:
Departments of Cardiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA Boston Children’s Hospital, and Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
Kimberlee Gauvreau
Affiliation:
Departments of Cardiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA Boston Children’s Hospital, and Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
Julian F. Forero
Affiliation:
Fundacion Cardioinfantil, Universidad del Rosario, Bogota, Colombia
Fabiola Pérez Juárez
Affiliation:
National Institute of Pediatric, Mexico City, Mexico
Snehal Kulkarni
Affiliation:
Kokilaben Dhirubhai Ambani Hospital, Andheri West, Mumbai, India
Vu Minh Phuc
Affiliation:
Children’s Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
David Schidlow
Affiliation:
Departments of Cardiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA Boston Children’s Hospital, and Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
*
Address for correspondence: Amara Majeed, Department of Cardiology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. Tel: 617-355-7186; Fax: 617-730-0710. E-mail: amara.majeed@cardio.chboston.org

Abstract

Background:

Surgical care for CHD is increasingly available in low- and middle-income countries, and efforts to optimise outcomes are growing. This study characterises cardiac imaging and prenatal diagnosis infrastructure in this setting.

Methods:

An infrastructure survey was administered to sites participating in the International Quality Improvement Collaborative for CHD. Questions regarding transthoracic, transesophageal and epicardial echocardiography, cardiac CT, cardiac magnetic resonance, prenatal screening and fetal echocardiography were included. Associations with in-hospital and 30-day mortality were assessed.

Results:

Thirty-seven sites in 17 countries responded. Programme size and geography varied considerably: < 250 cases (n = 13), 250–500 cases (n = 9), > 500 cases (n = 15); Americas (n = 13), Asia (n = 18), and Eastern Europe (n = 6). All had access to transthoracic echo. Most reported transesophageal and epicardial echocardiography availability (86 and 89%, respectively). Most (81%) had cardiac CT, but only 54% had cardiac magnetic resonance. A third reported impediments to imaging, including lack of portable machines, age/size-appropriate equipment and advanced cardiac imaging access and training. Only 19% of centres reported universal prenatal CHD screening in their catchment area, and only 46% always performed fetal echocardiography if screening raised concern for CHD. No statistically significant associations were identified between imaging modality availability and surgical outcomes.

Conclusions:

Although access to echocardiography is available in most middle-income countries; advanced imaging modalities (cardiac CT and magnetic resonance) are not always accessible. Prenatal screening for CHD is low, and availability of fetal echocardiography is limited. Imaging infrastructure in low- and middle-income countries and associations with outcomes merits additional study.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Zimmerman, MS, Smith, AGC, Sable, CA, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of congenital heart disease, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Child Adolesc Heal 2020; 4: 185200. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31978374/.Google Scholar
Jacobs, JP, Tchervenkov, CI, Stellin, G, et al. History of the World society for pediatric and congenital heart surgery: the first decade. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg 2018; 9: 392406.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jenkins, KJ, Castaneda, AR, Cherian, KM, et al. Reducing mortality and infections after congenital heart surgery in the developing world. Pediatrics 2014; 134: e1422e1430.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giang, DC, Phuc, V, Tin, D. Challenges in the management of congenital heart disease in Vietnam: a single center experience. Ann Pediatr Cardiol 2015; 8: 44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsiung, G, Abdullah, F. Financing pediatric surgery in low-, and middle-income countries. Semin Pediatr Surg 2016; 25: 1014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saxena, A. Congenital cardiac surgery in the less privileged regions of the world. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2009; 7: 16211629.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
St Louis, JD, Kurosawa, H, Jonas, RA, et al. The world database for pediatric and congenital heart surgery: the dawn of a new era of global communication and quality improvement in congenital heart disease. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg 2017; 8: 597599.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nguyen, N, Leon-Wyss, J, Iyer, KS, Thomas Pezzella, A. Paediatric cardiac surgery in low-income and middle-income countries: a continuing challenge. Arch Dis Child 2015; 100: 11561159..CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zilla, P, Yacoub, M, Zühlke, L, et al. Global unmet needs in cardiac surgery. Glob Heart 2018; 13: 293303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khan, A, Abdullah, A, Ahmad, H, et al. Impact of international quality improvement collaborative on congenital heart surgery in Pakistan. Heart 2017; 103: 16801686.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Project Redcap. REDCap. Research Electronic Data Capture. https://www.project-redcap.org.Google Scholar
Jenkins, KJ, Gauvreau, K, Newburger, JW, Spray, TL, Moller, JH, Iezzoni, LI. Consensus-based method for risk adjustment for surgery for congenital heart disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002; 123: 110118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
The World Bank. How does the World Bank Classify Countries? The World Bank.Google Scholar
WHO, Annex B. Tables of Health Statistics by Country, WHO Region and Globally. World Health Statistics. Geneva, WHO, 2016.Google Scholar
World Bank Data Team. New Country Classifications by Income Level. Data Blog. 2016. https://datatopics.worldbank.org/world-development-indicators/the-world-by-income-and-region.html.Google Scholar
Michelis, KC, Narotsky, DL, Choi, BG. Cardiovascular Imaging in Global Health Radiology. Radiology in Global Health: Strategies, Implementation, and Applications. Springer, Cham, 2018.Google Scholar
Michelis, KC, Choi, BG. Cardiovascular Imaging in Global Health Radiology. Radiology in Global Health: Strategies, Implementation, and Applications. Springer, Cham, 2014.Google Scholar
Guzeltas, A, Ozyilmaz, I, Tanidir, C, et al. The significance of transesophageal echocardiography in assessing congenital heart disease: Our experience. Congenit Heart Dis 2014; 9: 300306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stern, KWD, Emani, SM, Peek, GJ, Geva, T, Kutty, S. EE in Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery. World J Pediatr Congenit Hear Surg 2019; 10: 343350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dacher, JN, Barre, E, Durand, I, et al. CT and MR imaging in congenital cardiac malformations: Where do we come from and where are we going? Diagn Interv Imaging 2016; 97: 505512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shillingford, AJ, Glanzman, MM, Ittenbach, RF, Clancy, RR, Gaynor, JW, Wernovsky, G. Inattention, hyperactivity, and school performance in a population of school-age children with complex congenital heart disease. Pediatrics 2008; 121: e759e767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donofrio, MT, Moon-Grady, AJ, Hornberger, LK, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of fetal cardiac disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2014; 129: 21832242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rychik, J, Donaghue, DD, Levy, S, et al. Maternal psychological stress after prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease. J Pediatr 2013; 162: 302307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beroukhim, RS, Gauvreau, K, Benavidez, OJ, Baird, CW, Lafranchi, T, Tworetzky, W. Perinatal outcome after prenatal diagnosis of single-ventricle cardiac defects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 45: 657663.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vijayaraghavan, A, Sudhakar, A, Sundaram, KR, Kumar, RK, Vaidyanathan, B. Prenatal diagnosis and planned peri-partum care as a strategy to improve pre-operative status in neonates with critical CHDs in low-resource settings: a prospective study. Cardiol Young 2019; 29: 14811488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, QM, Liu, F, Wu, L, et al. Assessment of undiagnosed critical congenital heart disease before discharge from the maternity hospital. Zhonghua er ke za zhi = Chin J Pediatr 2017; 55: 260266.Google ScholarPubMed
Colaco, S, Karande, T, Bobhate, P, Jiyani, R, Rao, S, Kulkarni, S. Neonates with critical congenital heart defects: Impact of fetal diagnosis on immediate and short-term outcomes. Ann Pediatr Cardiol 2017; 10: 126.Google ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Majeed et al. supplementary material

Majeed et al. supplementary material 1

Download Majeed et al. supplementary material(File)
File 82.9 KB
Supplementary material: File

Majeed et al. supplementary material

Majeed et al. supplementary material 2

Download Majeed et al. supplementary material(File)
File 120.3 KB