Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T23:51:00.729Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prescribing an automated external defibrillator for children at increased risk of sudden arrhythmic death

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2017

Karen A. McLeod ,
Eileen Fern ,
Fiona Clements  and
Ruth McGowan
Karen A. McLeod*
Affiliation:
Departments of Cardiology and Clinical Genetics, Royal Hospital for Children, Queen Elizabeth University Hospitals, Glasgow, G51 4TF, United Kingdom
Eileen Fern
Affiliation:
Departments of Cardiology and Clinical Genetics, Royal Hospital for Children, Queen Elizabeth University Hospitals, Glasgow, G51 4TF, United Kingdom
Fiona Clements
Affiliation:
Departments of Cardiology and Clinical Genetics, Royal Hospital for Children, Queen Elizabeth University Hospitals, Glasgow, G51 4TF, United Kingdom
Ruth McGowan
Affiliation:
Departments of Cardiology and Clinical Genetics, Royal Hospital for Children, Queen Elizabeth University Hospitals, Glasgow, G51 4TF, United Kingdom
*
Correspondence to: Dr K. A. McLeod, MD, Royal Hospital for Children, 1345 Govan Road, Glasgow, G51 4TF, United Kingdom. Tel: +44 141 451 6508; Fax: +44 141 201 2215; E-mail: karen.mcleod@ggc.scot.nhs.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Automated external defibrillators can be life-saving in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Objective

Our aim was to review our experience of prescribing automated external defibrillators for children at increased risk of sudden arrhythmic death.

Methods

We reviewed all automated external defibrillators issued by the Scottish Paediatric Cardiac Electrophysiology Service from 2005 to 2015. All parents were given resuscitation training according to the Paediatric Resuscitation Guidelines, including the use of the automated external defibrillator.

Results

A total of 36 automated external defibrillators were issued to 36 families for 44 children (27 male). The mean age at issue was 8.8 years. Diagnoses at issue included long QT syndrome (50%), broad complex tachycardia (14%), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (11%), and catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (9%). During the study period, the automated external defibrillator was used in four (9%) children, and in all four the automated external defibrillator correctly discriminated between a shockable rhythm – polymorphic ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation in three patients with one or more shocks delivered – and non-shockable rhythm – sinus rhythm in one patient. Of the three children, two of them who received one or more shocks for ventricular fibrillation/polymorphic ventricular tachycardia survived, but one died as a result of recurrent torsades de pointes. There were no other deaths.

Conclusion

Parents can be taught to recognise cardiac arrest, apply resuscitation skills, and use an automated external defibrillator. Prescribing an automated external defibrillator should be considered for children at increased risk of sudden arrhythmic death, especially where the risk/benefit ratio of an implantable defibrillator is unclear or delay to defibrillator implantation is deemed necessary.

Keywords

Sudden deatharrhythmiaautomated defibrillatorchildren
Type
Original Articles
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 27 , Issue 7 , September 2017 , pp. 1271 - 1279
Check for updates
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Marron, BJ, Spirito, P, Ackerman, MJ, et al. Prevention of sudden death with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in children and adolescents with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 81: 1527–1535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Von Bergen, NH, Atkins, DL, Dick, M 2nd, et al. Multicenter study of the effectiveness of implantable cardioverter defibrillators in children and young adults with heart disease. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2014; 7: 1057–1063.Google Scholar
3. DeWitt, ES, Triedman, JK, Cecchin, F, et al. Time dependence of risks and benefits in pediatric primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy. Circulation 2004; 15: 1834–1841.Google Scholar
4. Pundi, KN, Bos, JM, Cannon, BC, Ackerman, MJ. Automated external defibrillator rescues among children with diagnosed and treated long QT syndrome. Heart Rhythm 2015; 12: 776–781.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Maconochie, I, de Caen, A, Aickin, R, et al. Part 6: pediatric basic life support and pediatric advanced life support 2015 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations. Resuscitation 2015; 95: e149–e170.Google ScholarPubMed
6. Beckermann, TM, McLeod, K, Murday, V, George, AL. Novel SCN5A mutation in amioadrone-responsive multifocal ventricular ectopy associated cardiomyopathy. Heart Rhythm 2014; 11: 1446–1453.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Westenskow, P, Splawski, I, Timothy, KW, Keating, MT, Sanguinetti, MC. Compound mutations: a common cause of severe long-QT syndrome. Heart Rhythm 2010; 7: 1411–1418.Google Scholar
8. Schwartz, PJ, Spazzolini, C, et al. The Jervell and Lange-Nielsen syndrome: natural history, molecular basis, and clinical outcome. Circulation 2006; 113: 783–790.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. White, RD, Vukov, LF, Bugliosi, TF. Early defibrillation by police: initial experience with measurement of critical time intervals and patient outcome. Ann Emerg Med 1994; 23: 1009–1013.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Valenzuela, TD, Roe, DJ, Nichol, G, et al. Outcomes of rapid defibrillation by security officers after cardiac arrest in casinos. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 1206–1209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Page, RL, Joglar, JA, Kowal, RC, et al. Use of automated external defibrillators by a US airline. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 1210–1216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Caffrey, SL, Willoughby, PJ, Pepe, PE, Becker, LB. Public use of automatic external defibrillators. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 1242–1247.Google Scholar
13. Drezner, JA, Toresdahl, BG, Rao, AL, Huszti, E, Harmon, KG. Outcome from sudden cardiac arrest in US high schools: a 2-year prospective study from the National Registry for Automated External Defibrillator Use in Sports. Br J Sports Med 2013; 47: 1179–1183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Gurnett, CA, Atkins, DL. Successful use of a biphasic waveform automated external defibrillator in a high-risk child. Am J Cardiol 2000; 86: 1051–1053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Bar-Cohen, Y, Walsh, E, Love, B, Cecchin, F. First appropriate use of automated external defibrillator in an infant. Resuscitation 2005; 67: 135–137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Divekar, A, Soni, R. Successful parental use of an automated external defibrillator for an infant with long-QT syndrome. Pediatrics 2006; 118: e-526–e-529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Haskell, SE, Atkins, DL. Defibrillation in children. J Emerg Trauma Shock 2010; 3: 261–266.Google ScholarPubMed
18. Berg, MD, Samson, RA, Meyer, RJ, Clark, LL, Valenzuela, TD, Berg, RA. Pediatric defibrillation doses often fail to terminate prolonged out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation in children. Resuscitation 2005; 67: 63–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Rossano, JW, Quan, L, Kenney, MA, Rea, TD, Atkins, DL. Energy dosing for attempted defibrillation of out of hospital pediatric ventricular fibrillation. Resuscitation 2006; 70: 80–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Dahl, CF, Ewy, GA, Warner, ED, Thomas, ED. Myocardial necrosis from direct current countershock: effect of paddle electrode size and time interval between discharges. Circulation 1974; 50: 956–961.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. Gaba, DM, Talner, NS. Myocardial damage following transthoracic direct current countershock in newborn piglets. Pediatr Cardiol 1982; 2: 281–288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22. Killingsworth, CR, Melnick, SB, Chapman, FW, et al. Defibrillation threshold and cardiac responses using an external biphasic defibrillator with pediatric and adult adhesive patches in pediatric-sized piglets. Resuscitation 2002; 55: 177–185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23. Atkins, DL, Jorgenson, DB. Attenuated pediatric electrode pads for automated external defibrillator use in children. Resuscitation 2005; 66: 31–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24. Cecchin, F, Jorgenson, DB, Berul, CI, et al. Is arrhythmia detection by automatic external defibrillator accurate for children? Sensitivity and specificity of an automatic external defibrillator algorithm in 696 pediatric arrhythmias. Circulation 2001; 103: 2483–2488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25. Atkinson, E, Mikysa, B, Conway, JA, et al. Specificity and sensitivity of automated external defibrillator rhythm analysis in infants and children. Ann Emerg Med 2003; 42: 185–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26. Von Bergen, NH, Atkins, DL, Dick, M 2nd, et al. Multicenter study of the effectiveness of implantable cardioverter defibrillators in children and young adults with heart disease. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2014; 7: 1057–1063.Google Scholar
27. DeWitt, ES, Triedman, JK, Cecchin, F, et al. Time dependence of risks and benefits in pediatric primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy. Circulation 2004; 20: 1834–1841.Google Scholar