Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T13:22:57.194Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Multimodality cardiovascular imaging in the diagnosis and management of prosthetic valve infective endocarditis in children report of two cases and brief review of the literature

Part of: Advanced Imaging

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 October 2019

Ariya Chau Open the ORCID record for Ariya Chau [Opens in a new window] ,
Pierangelo Renella  and
Antonio Arrieta
Ariya Chau*
Affiliation:
UCI/CHOC Pediatric Residency Program, Orange, CA, USA
Pierangelo Renella
Affiliation:
Division of Cardiology, CHOC Children’s Hospital, Orange, CA, USA Department of Pediatrics, University of California Irvine College of Medicine, Irvine, CA, USA
Antonio Arrieta
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, University of California Irvine College of Medicine, Irvine, CA, USA Divison of Infectious Disease, CHOC Children’s Hospital, Orange, CA, USA
*
Author for correspondence: A. Chau, UC Irvine/CHOC Residency Program, 505 South Main Street, Suite 525, Orange, CA 92868, USA. Tel: +916-420-8347; E-mail: ariyachau@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Diagnosing prosthetic valve infective endocarditis in children is challenging. Transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography can yield false-negative results. Data are lacking in paediatric multimodality imaging in prosthetic valve infective endocarditis. We present two children with repaired CHD where initial echocardiogram was non-diagnostic, while CT angiogram and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in combination with CT angiography, respectively, confirmed the diagnosis of endocarditis affecting clinical management.

Keywords

Advanced cardiovascular imagingCHDcomputed tomography angiographyechocardiographyinfective endocarditisFDG-positron emission tomographypaediatricsprosthetic valve
Type
Brief Report
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 29 , Issue 12 , December 2019 , pp. 1526 - 1529
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

All authors have seen and approved the manuscript.

References

Knirsch, W, Nadal, D. Infective endocarditis in congenital heart disease. Eur J Pediatr 2011; 170: 1111–1127. 2011 July 20. [Epub ahead of print]. doi:10.1007/s00431-011-1520-8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, JA, Boyce, TG, Cetta, F, et al. Infective endocarditis in the pediatric patient: a 60-year single-institution review. Mayo Clin Proc 2012; 87: 629–635. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.02.023.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sun, L, Lai, C, Wang, Y, et al. Risk factors for infective endocarditis in children with congenital heart diseases – a nationwide population-based case control study. Int J Cardiol 2017; 248: 126–130. 2017 August 12. [Epub ahead of print]. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.08.009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Habib, G, Lancellotti, P, Antunes, MJ, et al. 2015 ESC guidelines for the management of infective endocarditis. Eur Heart J 2015; 36: 3075–3128. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehv319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robichaud, B, Hill, G, Cohen, S, et al. Bioprosthetic pulmonary valve endocarditis: incidence, risk factors, and clinical outcomes. Cong Heart Dis 2018; 13: 734–739. doi:10.1111/chd.12639.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Habets, J, Tanis, W, van Herwerden, L, et al. Cardiac computed tomography angiography results in diagnostic and therapeutic change in prosthetic heart valve endocarditis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2013; 30: 377–387.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meyer, Z, Fischer, M, Koerfer, J, et al. The role of FDG-PET-CT in pediatric cardiac patients and patients with congenital heart defects. Int J Cardiol 2016; 220: 656–660.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baddour, LM, Taubert, KA, Gewitz, MH, et al. Infective endocarditis. In: Fuster, V (ed.). The AHA Guidelines and Scientific Statements Handbook, 2015: 312–335. doi:10.1002/9781444303476.ch19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barzouhi, AE, Tanis, W, Gelder, REV, Vriend, JWJ. The pivotal role of cardiac computed tomography angiogram and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography in the diagnosis of right sided endocarditis: a case report. Eur Heart J Case Rep 2019; 3. doi:10.1093/ehjcr/yty165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomes, A, Glaudemans, AW, Touw, DJ, et al. Diagnostic value of imaging in infective endocarditis: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis, 2017; 17: e1–e14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kanza, RE, Allard, C, Berube, M. Cardiac findings on non-gated chest computed tomography: a clinical and pictorial review. Eur J Radiol 2016; 85: 435–451. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.11.042.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, Y, Osborne, MT, Tung, B, Li, M, Li, Y. Imaging cardiovascular calcification. J Am Heart Assoc 2018; 7: 1–15. doi:10.1161/jaha.118.008564.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schindler, TH. Another potential step to improve prosthetic heart valve endocarditis imaging with 18F-FDG PET/CT. J Nucl Cardiol 2017; 25: 1968–1970. doi:10.1007/s12350-017-0935-7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed