Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T07:25:32.492Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Feeding after congenital heart surgery: a mixed-methods study of the caregiver experience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 October 2023

Emily Wright*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, USA
Chelsea Phillips
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA
Saria Matthews
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, USA
Dio Kavalieratos
Affiliation:
Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, USA
William G. Sharp
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, USA
Nikhila Raol
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, USA
*
Corresponding author: E. Wright; Email: emily.wright@emory.edu

Abstract

Objectives:

Feeding difficulties after congenital heart surgery are a common concern for caregivers of children with CHD. Insight into the intricacies of their experience is lacking. With a better understanding, healthcare providers can continue to optimize the approach and support mechanisms for these families. This study will explore the psychosocial impacts on caregivers, define barriers to care, and identify areas to improve their care.

Study Design:

This mixed-methods study combined semi-structured interviews with surveys. Purposive sampling targeted caregivers of a child who underwent heart surgery and was discharged with alternative enteral feeding access. A hybrid inductive-deductive methodology was used to analyse interview transcripts. Survey scores were compared to interview content for concordance.

Results:

Fifteen interviews were conducted with socio-demographically diverse caregivers. Feeding difficulties were often identified as their greatest challenge, with the laborious feeding schedule, sleep deprivation, and tube management being common contributors. Most caregivers described feeling overwhelmed and worried. Time-intensive feeding schedules and lack of appropriate childcare options precluded caregivers’ ability to work. Barriers to care included imperfect feeding education, proximity of specialist clinics, and issues with medical supply companies. Caregiver proposals for improved care addressed easing the transition home, improving emotional support mechanisms, and intensifying feeding therapy for expedited tube removal.

Conclusion:

This study describes the psychosocial toll on the caregiver, typical barriers to care, and ideas for improved provision of care. These themes and ideas can be used to advance the family-centered approach to feeding difficulties after heart surgery.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hill, R, Tey, CS, Jung, C, et al. Feeding outcomes after paediatric cardiothoracic surgery: a retrospective review. Cardiol Young 2021; 31: 673681.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kogon, BE, Ramaswamy, V, Todd, K, et al. Feeding difficulty in newborns following congenital heart surgery. Congenit Heart Dis 2007; 2: 332337.10.1111/j.1747-0803.2007.00121.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, KL, Ridout, D, Pagel, C, et al. Incidence and risk factors for important early morbidities associated with pediatric cardiac surgery in a UK population. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2019; 158: 118596 e7.10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.03.139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sables-Baus, S, Kaufman, J, Cook, P, et al. Oral feeding outcomes in neonates with congenital cardiac disease undergoing cardiac surgery. Cardiol Young 2012; 22: 4248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ubeda Tikkanen, A, Nathan, M, Sleeper, LA, et al. Predictors of postoperative rehabilitation therapy following congenital heart surgery. J Am Heart Assoc 2018; 7: e008094.10.1161/JAHA.117.008094CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Medoff-Cooper, B, Irving, SY. Innovative strategies for feeding and nutrition in infants with congenitally malformed hearts. Cardiol Young 2009; 19 Suppl, 2: 9095.10.1017/S1047951109991673CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartman, DM, Medoff-Cooper, B. Transition to home after neonatal surgery for congenital heart disease. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs 2012; 37: 95100.10.1097/NMC.0b013e318241dac1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tregay, J, Brown, K, Crowe, S, et al. I was so worried about every drop of milk, – feeding problems at home are a significant concern for parents after major heart surgery in infancy. Matern Child Nutr 2017; 13: e12302.10.1111/mcn.12302CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wray, J, Ridout, D, Jones, A, et al. Morbidities after cardiac surgery: impact on children’s quality of life and parents' mental health. Ann Thorac Surg 2021; 112: 20552062.10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.11.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Medoff-Cooper, B, Naim, M, Torowicz, D, et al. Feeding, growth, and nutrition in children with congenitally malformed hearts. Cardiol Young 2010; 20: 149153.10.1017/S1047951110001228CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woolf-King, SE, Arnold, E, Weiss, S, et al. There’s no acknowledgement of what this does to people”: a qualitative exploration of mental health among parents of children with critical congenital heart defects. J Clin Nurs 2018; 27: 27852794.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lefton-Greif, MA, Okelo, SO, Wright, JM, et al. Impact of children’s feeding/swallowing problems: validation of a new caregiver instrument. Dysphagia 2014; 29: 671677.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hennink, M, Kaiser, BN. Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: a systematic review of empirical tests. Soc Sci Med 2022; 292: 114523.10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woolf-King, SE, Anger, A, Arnold, EA, et al. Mental health among parents of children with critical congenital heart defects: a systematic review. J Am Heart Assoc 2017; 6: e004862.10.1161/JAHA.116.004862CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuo, DZ, Cohen, E, Agrawal, R, et al. A national profile of caregiver challenges among more medically complex children with special health care needs. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2011; 165: 10201026.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
March, S. Parents’ perceptions during the transition to home for their child with a congenital heart defect: how can we support families of children with hypoplastic left heart syndrome? J Spec Pediatr Nurs 2017; 22: e12185.10.1111/jspn.12185CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, Q-L, Lei, Y-Q, Liu, J-F, et al. Using telemedicine to improve the quality of life of parents of infants with CHD surgery after discharge. Int J Qual Health C 2021; 33: 1–6.10.1093/intqhc/mzab133CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, QL, Lei, YQ, Liu, JF, et al. Telehealth education improves parental care ability and postoperative nutritional status of infants after CHD surgery: a prospective randomized controlled study. Paediatr Child Health 2022; 27: 154159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Toole, BJ, Toole, LE, Kyle, UG, et al. Perioperative nutritional support and malnutrition in infants and children with congenital heart disease. Congenit Heart Dis 2014; 9: 1525.10.1111/chd.12064CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maurer, I, Latal, B, Geissmann, H, et al. Prevalence and predictors of later feeding disorders in children who underwent neonatal cardiac surgery for congenital heart disease. Cardiol Young 2011; 21: 303309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slater, N, Spader, M, Fridgen, J, et al. Weaning from a feeding tube in children with congenital heart disease: a review of the literature. Prog Pediatr Cardiol 2021; 62: 101406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medoff-Cooper, B, Ravishankar, C. Nutrition and growth in congenital heart disease: a challenge in children. Curr Opin Cardiol 2013; 28: 122129.10.1097/HCO.0b013e32835dd005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Wright et al. supplementary material

Wright et al. supplementary material
Download Wright et al. supplementary material(File)
File 593.7 KB