Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T12:54:15.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characterisation and long-term follow-up of children with Brugada syndrome: experience from a tertiary paediatric referral centre

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2022

Sara I.L. Fernandes*
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Leiria Hospital Centre, Leiria, Portugal
Maria H. A. Carvalho
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatric Cardiology, Coimbra Hospital and University Centre, Coimbra, Portugal
Isabel C.T. Santos
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatric Cardiology, Coimbra Hospital and University Centre, Coimbra, Portugal
Andreia F.M. Palma
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatric Cardiology, Coimbra Hospital and University Centre, Coimbra, Portugal
Diogo R.O. Faim
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatric Cardiology, Coimbra Hospital and University Centre, Coimbra, Portugal
João M.O. Dias
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatric Cardiology, Coimbra Hospital and University Centre, Coimbra, Portugal
Izidro R. Borges
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatric Cardiology, Coimbra Hospital and University Centre, Coimbra, Portugal
Hélia A.F. Martins
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Leiria Hospital Centre, Leiria, Portugal
António M.G.S. Pires
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatric Cardiology, Coimbra Hospital and University Centre, Coimbra, Portugal
*
Author for correspondence: Sara Lopes Fernandes, Department of Cardiology - Leiria Hospital Centre E.P.E. - Hospital de Santo André, Rua das Olhalvas, 2410-197 Leiria, Portugal. Tel: +351 962402208; Fax: +351 244 817 065. E-mail: sarafernandes24892@gmail.com

Abstract

Aims:

Brugada syndrome is an inherited condition, which typically presents in young adults. It can also be diagnosed in children, but data in this group remain scarce. This study aims to describe the clinical features, management, and follow-up of children with personal or family history of Brugada syndrome.

Methods:

Retrospective study of consecutive patients with Brugada history followed up in a tertiary paediatric referral centre between 2009 and 2021. Patients were assessed according to the phenotype: positive (with variable genotype) or negative (with positive genotype).

Results:

Thirty patients were included (mean age at diagnosis 7 ± 6 years, 53% male). Within the positive phenotype (n = 16), 81% were male, and 88% had spontaneous type 1 ECG pattern. A genetic test was performed in 88% and was positive in 57%. Fourteen patients had a negative phenotype–positive genotype, 79% female, all diagnosed during family screening; 43% mentioned family history of sudden cardiac death. Although most of the patients were asymptomatic, the prevalence of rhythm/conduction disturbances was not negligible, particularly if a positive phenotype. No clinically significant events were reported in the negative phenotype patients. Three patients were hospitalised due to an arrhythmic cause, all in patients with a positive phenotype.

Conclusion:

In our study, the documentation of rhythm and conduction disturbances was not infrequent, especially in patients with a positive phenotype. Despite the significant family history, phenotype negative patients had no relevant events during follow-up. Nevertheless, the management of these patients is not clear cut, and a personalised therapeutic strategy with close follow-up is essential.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brugada, J, Campuzano, O, Arbelo, E, Sarquella-Brugada, G, Brugada, R. Present status of brugada syndrome: JACC State-of-the-Art review. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018; 72: 10461059.10.1016/j.jacc.2018.06.037CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krahn, AD, Behr, ER, Hamilton, R, Probst, V, Laksman, Z, Han, H. Brugada Syndrome, vol. 8. Clinical Electrophysiology, JACC, 2022, 386405.Google ScholarPubMed
Milman, A, Andorin, A, Gourraud, JB, et al. Age of first arrhythmic event in brugada syndrome: data from the SABRUS (Survey on arrhythmic events in brugada syndrome) in 678 patients. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2017; 10: e005222.10.1161/CIRCEP.117.005222CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brugada, P, Brugada, J. Right bundle branch block, persistent ST segment elevation and sudden cardiac death: a distinct clinical and electrocardiographic syndrome. a multicenter report. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 20: 13911396.10.1016/0735-1097(92)90253-JCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oe, H, Takagi, M, Tanaka, A, et al. Prevalence and clinical course of the juveniles with brugada-type ECG in japanese population. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2005; 28: 549554.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Behere, S, Weindling, S. Brugada syndrome in children - stepping into unchartered territory. Ann Pediatr Cardiol 2017; 10: 248258.10.4103/apc.APC_49_17CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Probst, V, Denjoy, I, Meregalli, PG, et al. Clinical aspects and prognosis of brugada syndrome in children. Circulation 2007; 115: 20422048.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.664219CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gonzalez Corcia, MC, Sieira, J, Sarkozy, A, et al. Brugada syndrome in the young: an assessment of risk factors predicting future events. Europace 2017; 19: 18641873.Google Scholar
Michowitz, Y, Milman, A, Andorin, A, et al. Characterization and management of arrhythmic events in young patients with brugada syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019; 73: 17561765.10.1016/j.jacc.2019.01.048CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gonzalez Corcia, MC, Sieira, J, Pappaert, G, et al. Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators in children and adolescents with brugada syndrome J am coll cardiol 2018, 71:148157.10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez Corcia, MC, de Asmundis, C, Chierchia, GB, Brugada, P. Brugada syndrome in the paediatric population: a comprehensive approach to clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and management. Cardiol Young 2016; 26: 10441055.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gonzalez Corcia, MC, Sieira, J, Pappaert, G, et al. A clinical score model to predict lethal events in young patients (≤19 years) with brugada syndrome. Am J Cardiol 2017; 120: 797802.10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.05.056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, JR, Chung, SK, Nel, CA, et al. Brugada syndrome masquerading as febrile seizures. Pediatrics 2007; 119: e1206e1211.10.1542/peds.2006-2628CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andorin, A, Behr, ER, Denjoy, I, et al. Impact of clinical and genetic findings on the management of young patients with brugada syndrome. Heart Rhythm 2016; 13: 12741282.10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.02.013CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Priori, SG, Blomström-Lundqvist, C, Mazzanti, A, et al. ESC guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: the task force for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death of the european society of cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2015; 36: 27932867, 2015.10.1093/eurheartj/ehv316CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pelliccia, A, Sharma, S, Gati, S, et al. ESC guidelines on sports cardiology and exercise in patients with cardiovascular disease: the task force on sports cardiology and exercise in patients with cardiovascular disease of the european society of cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2020; 42: 1796, 2021.10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah, MJ, Silka, MJ, Silva, JNA, et al. PACES expert consensus statement on the indications and management of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices in pediatric patients. Cardiol Young 2021; 31: 17381769, 2021.10.1017/S1047951121003413CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Fernandes et al. supplementary material

Tables S1-S2

Download Fernandes et al. supplementary material(File)
File 17.2 KB