Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-07T07:57:08.028Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Does congenital heart disease severely jeopardise family life and pregnancies? Obstetrical history of women with congenital heart disease in a single tertiary centre

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2012

Marielle Morissens*
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Brugmann University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium
Pierre Viart
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, University Children's Hospital Queen Fabiola, Belgium
Laura Tecco
Affiliation:
Department of Gynecology, Brugmann University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium
Pierre Wauthy
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Brugmann University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium
Simone Michiels
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, University Children's Hospital Queen Fabiola, Belgium
Hugues Dessy
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, University Children's Hospital Queen Fabiola, Belgium
Sophie Malekzadeh Milani
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, University Children's Hospital Queen Fabiola, Belgium
Thierry Verbeet
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Brugmann University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium
Jose Castro Rodriguez
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Brugmann University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium
*
Correspondance to: Dr M. Morissens, Service de Cardiologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Brugmann, 4 Place Arthur van Gehuchten, 1020 Bruxelles, Belgium. Tel: +32 2 477 26 79; Fax: +32 477 26 32; E-mail: marielle.morissens@chu-brugmann.be

Abstract

Aim

Women with congenital heart disease are often considered to be restricted in their obstetrical life and even their marital life. Our single-centre study aimed to determine the real-life situation of these women with regard to successful family life and any pregnancy complications they may experience.

Methods

From our database of adults with congenital heart disease, 160 of 178 women completed a questionnaire and had their files reviewed. They were classified into three groups according to their pregnancy risk – “good condition” group, no pregnancy restriction; “at-risk” group, pregnancy allowed with close follow-up at a tertiary centre; and “contraindicated” group, pregnancy inadvisable.

Results

The proportion of women in a relationship was 46% with no difference between the three groups. In the groups where pregnancy was allowed, 55% of women conceived a child. The total incidence of spontaneous abortion was 21%. The rate of caesarean section was 15%. The incidence of cardiac failure was 4.7%, arrhythmia 1.2%, endocarditis 1.2%, hypertension 2.4%, and preeclampsia 1.2%. Foetal complications included prematurity and/or low birth weight (9.5%) and one foetal malformation (0.82%).

Conclusion

Women with severe congenital heart disease are willing to start a family and are successful in this enterprise. Although the complication rate during pregnancy in congenital heart disease remains high, with good monitoring these pregnancies occur without severe complications and a low rate of medical abortion or caesarean section.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Khairy, P, Ouyang, DW, Fernandes, SM, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in women with congenital heart disease. Circulation 2006; 113: 517524.Google Scholar
2. Drenthen, W, Pieper, PG, Roos-Hesselink, JW, et al. Outcome of pregnancy in women with congenital heart disease: a literature review. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49: 23032311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Kaemmerer, H, Bauer, U, Stein, J-I, et al. Pregnancy in congenital cardiac disease: an increasing challenge for cardiologists and obstetricians – a prospective multicenter study. Z Kardiol 2003; 92: 1623.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Yap, S-C, Drenthen, W, Meijboom, FJ, et al. Comparison of pregnancy outcomes in women with repaired versus unrepaired atrial septal defect. BJOG 2009; 116: 15931601.Google Scholar
5. Jastrow, N, Meyer, P, Khairy, P , et al. Prediction of complications in pregnant women with cardiac diseases referred to a tertiary center. Int J Cardiol 2011; 151: 209213.Google Scholar
6. Drenthen, W, Boersma, E, Balci, A, et al. Predictors of pregnancy complications in women with congenital heart disease. Eur Heart J 2010; 31: 21242132.Google Scholar
7. Aggarwal, N, Suri, V, Kaur, H, Chopra, S, Rohila, M, Vijayvergiya, R. Retrospective analysis of outcome of pregnancy in women with congenital heart disease: single-centre experience from North India. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2009; 49: 376381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Siu, SC, Colman, JM, Sorensen, S, et al. Adverse neonatal and cardiac outcomes are more common in pregnant women with cardiac disease. Circulation 2002; 105: 21792184.Google Scholar
9. Brandhagen, DJ, Feldt, RH, Williams, DE. Long-term psychologic implications of congenital heart disease: a 25-year follow-up. Mayo Clin Proc 1991; 66: 474479.Google Scholar
10. Siu, SC, Sermer, M, Colman, JM, et al. Prospective multicenter study of pregnancy outcomes in women with heart disease. Circulation 2001; 104: 515521.Google Scholar
11. Fesslova, VM, Villa, L, Chessa, M, et al. Prospective evaluation from single center of pregnancy in women with congenital heart disease. Int J Cardiol 2009; 131: 257264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Presbitero, P, Somerville, J, Stone, S, Aruta, E, Spiegelhalter, D, Rabajoli, F. Pregnancy in cyanotic congenital heart disease. Outcome of mother and fetus. Circulation 1994; 89: 26732676.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed