Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T02:34:11.745Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Normalisation du Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) chez les Québécois francophones âgés de 65 ans et plus et résidant dans la communauté*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2009

Carol Hudon*
Affiliation:
École de psychologie, Université Laval Centre de recherche Université Laval Robert-Giffard
Olivier Potvin
Affiliation:
Centre de recherche Université Laval Robert-Giffard Département des sciences de la santé, Université de Sherbrooke Centre de recherche Hôpital Charles LeMoyne
Marie-Christine Turcotte
Affiliation:
Centre de recherche Université Laval Robert-Giffard
Catherine D’Anjou
Affiliation:
Centre de recherche Université Laval Robert-Giffard
Micheline Dubé
Affiliation:
Département de psychologie, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Michel Préville
Affiliation:
Département des sciences de la santé, Université de Sherbrooke Centre de recherche Hôpital Charles LeMoyne
Joëlle Brassard
Affiliation:
Centre de recherche Hôpital Charles LeMoyne
*
La correspondance concernant cet article doit être adressée à : / Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to: Carol Hudon, PhD Centre de recherche Université Laval Robert-Giffard 2601, ch. de la Canardière F-4500, Québec, Québec, G1J 2G3 Téléphone: +1 418-663-5741 Fax: +1 418-663-5971 (carol.hudon@psy.ulaval.ca)

Abstract

This study was aimed at providing normative data for the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). The norms were built from a sample (n = 2409) of community-dwelling French speaking residents from Québec aged 65 and older. The analyses indicated that socio-demographic variables such as education level, age, and gender of individuals influenced significantly the scores of older adults on the MMSE. More precisely, MMSE scores increased with education level and decreased with age. Moreover, women had significantly higher scores than men. On this basis, distinct tables of normative data were produced for women and men. In each table, the MMSE scores corresponding to percentiles 5, 10, 15 and 50 were identified according to four age categories and three education levels. Overall, the use of the present normative data by clinicians will improve their accuracy in detecting cognitive impairment in older adults from Québec.

Résumé

Cette étude vise à produire un standard normatif pour le Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Les normes ont été constituées à partir d’un échantillon (n = 2409) de Québécois francophones de 65 ans et plus résidant dans la communauté. Les analyses ont indiqué que les variables sociodémographiques, tel que la scolarité, l’âge et le genre, influencent significativement les cotes des personnes âgées au MMSE. Les cotes au MMSE augmentent avec le niveau de scolarité et diminuent avec l’âge. De plus, les femmes obtiennent des cotes significativement supérieures à celles des hommes. Ainsi, des tableaux de normes séparés ont été développés pour les femmes et les hommes. Dans chaque tableau, les cotes au MMSE correspondant aux percentiles 5, 10, 15 et 50 ont été identifiées selon quatre tranches d’âge et trois niveaux de scolarité. L’utilisation des données normatives de cette étude optimisera la détection des troubles cognitifs dans la population âgée du Québec.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Cette étude a été subventionnée par les Instituts de recherche en santé du Canada (IRSC) et par le Fond de recherche en santé du Québec (FRSQ). Les auteurs remercient Djamal Berbiche pour ses conseils concernant les analyses statistiques.

References

Références

American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: APA.Google Scholar
Anderson, T.M., Sachdev, P.S., Brodaty, H., Trollor, J.N., et Andrews, G. (2007). Effects of sociodemographic and health variables on Mini-Mental State Exam scores in older Australians. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 15, 467476.Google Scholar
Anstey, K.J., Matters, B., Brown, A.K., et Lord, S.R. (2000). Normative data on neuropsychological tests for very old adults living in retirement villages and hostels. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 14, 309317.Google Scholar
Bélanger, A., Martel, L., et Caron Malenfant, E. (2006). Recensement de la population, 1956-2006; Projections démographiques pour le Canada, les provinces et les territoires, 2005-2031. Retrieved December 15, 2008, from http://www12.statcan.ca/francais/census06/analysis/agesex/NatlPortrait1.cfmGoogle Scholar
Bravo, G. et Hebert, R. (1997). Age- and education-specific reference values for the Mini-Mental and modified Mini-Mental State Examinations derived from a non-demented elderly population. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 12, 10081018.3.0.CO;2-A>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Canadian Study of Health and Aging Working Group. (1994). Canadian study of health and aging: Study methods and prevalence of dementia. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 150, 899913.Google Scholar
Canadian Study of Health and Aging Working Group. (2000). The incidence of dementia in Canada. Neurology, 55, 6673.Google Scholar
Corrada, M.M., Brookmeyer, R., Berlau, D., Paganini-Hill, A., et Kawas, C.H. (2008). Prevalence of dementia after age 90: Results from the 90+ study. Neurology, 71, 337343.Google Scholar
Crum, R.M., Anthony, J.C., Bassett, S.S., et Folstein, M.F. (1993). Population-based norms for the Mini-Mental State Examination by age and educational level. Journal of the American Medical Association, 269, 23862391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cullen, B., Fahy, S., Cunningham, C.J., Coen, R.F., Bruce, I., Greene, E., et al. (2005). Screening for dementia in an Irish community sample using MMSE: A comparison of norm-adjusted versus fixed cut-points. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 20, 371376.Google Scholar
Folstein, M., Anthony, J.C., Parhad, I., Duffy, B., et Gruenberg, E.M. (1985). The meaning of cognitive impairment in the elderly. Journal of the American Geriatric Society, 33, 228235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Folstein, M.F., Folstein, S.E., et McHugh, P.R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189198.Google Scholar
Fratiglioni, L., Jorm, A.F., Grut, M., Viitanen, M., Holmen, K., Ahlbom, A., et al. (1993). Predicting dementia from the Mini-Mental State Examination in an elderly population: The role of education. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 46, 281287.Google Scholar
Grigoletto, F., Zappala, G., Anderson, D.W., et Lebowitz, B.D. (1999). Norms for the Mini-Mental State Examination in a healthy population. Neurology, 53, 315320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hébert, M., Thibeault, R., Sacolax, N., Tandon, K., Germain, M., Bruneau, P., et al. (2007). Utilité clinique de trois outils d’évaluation pour les personnes atteintes de démence. Revue canadienne d’ergothérapie, 74, 102114.Google Scholar
Kalafat, M., Hugonot-Dierner, L., et Poitrenaud, J. (2003). Standardisation et étalonnage français du “Mini Mental State” (MMS) version GRÉCO. Revue de Neuropsychologie, 13, 209236.Google Scholar
Knight, R.G., McMahon, J., Green, T.J., et Murray Skeaff, C. (2006). Regression equations for predicting scores of persons over 65 on the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, the Mini-Mental State Examination, the Trail Making Test and semantic fluency measures. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 45, 393402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kohn, R., Vicente, B., Rioseco, P., Saldivia, S., et Torres, S. (2008). The Mini-Mental State Examination: Age and education distribution for a Latin American population. Aging & Mental Health, 12, 6671.Google Scholar
Lezak, M.D., Howieson, D.B., Loring, D.W., Hannay, H.J., et Fischer, J.S. (2004). Neuropsychological assessment (4th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Malloy, P.F., Cummings, J.L., Coffey, C.E., Duffy, J., Fink, M., Lauterbach, E.C., et al. (1997). Cognitive screening instruments in neuropsychiatry: A report of the Committee on Research of the American Neuropsychiatric Association. Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 9, 189197.Google Scholar
Measso, G., Cavarzevan, F., Zappalà, G., Lebowitz, B.D., Crook, T.H., Pirozzolo, F.L., et al. (1993). The Mini-Mental State Examination: Normative study of an Italian random sample. Developmental Neuropsychology, 9, 7785.Google Scholar
Meiran, N., Stuss, D.T., Guzman, D.A., Lafleche, G., et Willmer, J. (1996). Diagnosis of dementia. Methods for interpretation of scores of 5 neuropsychological tests. Archives of Neurology, 53, 10431054.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nguyen, H.T., Black, S.A., Ray, L.A., Espino, D.V., et Markides, K.S. (2002). Predictors of decline in MMSE scores among older Mexican Americans. Journal of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 57, M181M185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Préville, M., Boyer, R., Grenier, S., Dubé, M., Voyer, P., Punti, R., et al. (2008). The epidemiology of psychiatric disorders in the Quebec older adult population. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 53, 822832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, R., Johnson, J., Richards, M., Brayne, C., et Mann, A. (2002). The distribution of Mini-Mental State Examination scores in an older UK African-Caribbean population compared to MRC CFA study norms. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 17, 745751.Google Scholar
Strauss, E., Sherman, E.M.S., et Spreen, O. (2006). A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests: Administration, norms, and commentary (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Strickland, T.L., Longobardi, P.G., Alperson, B.L., et Andre, K. (2005). Mini-Mental State and Cognistat performance in an older African American sample. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 19, 8798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar