Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T00:47:26.077Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Vetoes and Venues: Economic Crisis and the Roads to Recovery in Michigan and Ontario

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 December 2014

John Constantelos
John Constantelos*
Affiliation:
Grand Valley State University
*
Department of Political Science, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI 49401, Email: constanj@gvsu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines executive responses to economic decline in Ontario and Michigan from 2003 to 2012, when the two governments struggled to adjust to a severe manufacturing crisis which greatly worsened during the Great Recession in 2008–2009. Sharing an international border, these cases offer control over an unusually large number of economic, social and political factors, permitting a focused analysis of the impact of divided government and fiscal decentralization on executive policy making. The research finds that greater fiscal decentralization in Canada and unified government in Ontario allowed the province to develop a more rapid and more robust response to the economic crisis in comparison to the State of Michigan. Budgetary constraints and a partisan veto at the state level forced Michigan's governor to redirect her efforts to the federal venue.

Résumé

L'article examine les réponses des exécutifs au déclin économique de l'Ontario et du Michigan de 2003 à 2012, lorsque les deux gouvernements éprouvèrent des difficultés à s'adapter devant une grave crise du secteur manufacturier qui empira durant la Grande Récession 2008–9. Partageant une frontière internationale, ces deux cas permettent de contrôler un nombre inhabituellement élevé de facteurs économiques, sociaux et politiques. Cette recherche montre qu'une plus grande décentralisation fiscale au Canada et qu'un gouvernement unifié en Ontario ont permis à la province d'élaborer une réponse plus rapide et plus robuste à la crise économique que le put l'État du Michigan. Les contraintes budgétaires et un veto partisan au niveau de l'État ont en effet forcé la gouverneure du Michigan à rediriger ses efforts vers le gouvernement fédéral.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 47 , Issue 4 , December 2014 , pp. 827 - 853
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association (l'Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alesina, Alberto and Rosenthal, Howard. 1995. Partisan Politics, Divided Government, and the Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, Dave. 2009. “Local WindTronics turbine firm picks Ontario over Muskegon for production.” Mlive.com, October 9. http://www.mlive.com/news/muskegon/index.ssf/2009/10/local_windtronics_turbine_firm.html (November 3, 2014).Google Scholar
Anderson Economic Group. 2010. “Effectiveness of Michigan's Key Business Tax Incentives.” www.andersoneconomicgroup.com/Portals/0/upload/MEA_Evaluating_TaxAbatements_Public.pdf (November 6, 2014).Google Scholar
Ballard, Charles. 2010. Michigan's Economic Future: A New Look. East Lansing MI: Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar
Bartik, Timothy J. and Erickcek, George. 2010. “The Employment and Fiscal Effects of Michigan's MEGA Tax Credit Program.” Working paper no. 10–164. Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.Google Scholar
Bartik, Timothy J., Erickcek, George, Huang, Wei-Jang and Watts, Brad. 2006. “Michigan's Economic Competitiveness and Public Policy.” Report prepared for the Michigan Economic Development Corporation (MEDC). http://research.upjohn.org/reports/38 (July 30, 2014).Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R. and Jones, Bryan D.. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Benzie, Robert. 2014. “The Redemption of Dalton McGuinty.” The Toronto Star, July 13, IN1.Google Scholar
Biela, Jan, Hennl, Annika and Kaiser, André. 2013. Policy Making in Multilevel Systems: Federalism, Decentralisation, and Performance in the OECD Countries. Colchester UK: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
Binder, Sarah. 1999. “The Dynamics of Legislative Gridlock, 1947–96.” American Political Science Review 93 (3): 519–33.Google Scholar
Blöchliger, Hansjörg and King, David. 2006. “Fiscal Autonomy of Sub-Central Governments.” Working Papers on Fiscal Federalism. OECD: Paris.Google Scholar
Castles, Francis G. 2000. “Federalism, Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Performance.” In Federalism and Political Performance, ed. Wachendorfer-Schmidt, Ute. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Citizens Research Council. 2007. Survey of Economic Development Programs in Michigan. 2nd ed. http://www.crcmich.org/PUBLICAT/2000s/2007/rpt347.pdf (November 6, 2014).Google Scholar
Clark, Susan E. and Gaile, Gary L.. 1989. “Moving Towards Entrepreneurial State and Local Development Strategies: Opportunities and Barriers.” Policy Studies Journal 17: 574–98.Google Scholar
Coleman, John J. 1999. “Unified Government, Divided Government, and Party Responsiveness.” American Political Science Review 93 (4): 821–35.Google Scholar
Conference Board of Canada. n.d. “2011 Ontario Budget.” http://www.conferenceboard.ca/topics/economics/budgets/ontario_2011_budget.aspx (November 6, 2014).Google Scholar
Constantelos, John. 2010. “Playing the Field: Federalism and the Politics of Venue Shopping in the United States and Canada.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 40 (3): 460–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“D.R.I.C. Dead for Now ” 2010. Gongwer News Service, December 2. www.gongwer.com (November 3, 2014).Google Scholar
Edwards, George C. III, Barrett, Andrew and Peake, Jeffrey. 1997. “The Legislative Impact of Divided Government.” American Journal of Political Science 41: 545–63.Google Scholar
Eisinger, Peter K. 1988. The Rise of the Entrepreneurial State: State and Local Economic Development in the United States. Madison WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Elgie, Robert, ed. 2001. Divided Government in Comparative Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Esselment, Anna Lennox. 2012. “A Little Help from My Friends: The Partisan Factor and Intergovernmental Negotiations in Canada.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 43 (4): 701–27.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Rob. 2007. “McGuinty, Rivals Joust over Lagging Economy.” The Toronto Star, September 14, A01.Google Scholar
Field, Martha A. 1992. “The Differing Federalisms of Canada and the United States.” Law and Contemporary Problems 55:107–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, Morris K. 1992. Divided Government. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Glazer, Lou and Grimes, Donald. 2004. A New Path to Prosperity? Manufacturing and Knowledge-Based Industries. Michigan Future Inc. http://www.michiganfuture.org/cms/assets/uploads/2014/07/Prosperity.pdf (November 6, 2014).Google Scholar
“GM asks for federal help in wake of auto industry sales carnage.” 2008. Mlive, November 3. http://www.mlive.com/business/index.ssf/2008/11/gm_asks_for_federal_help_in_wa.html (November 6, 2014).Google Scholar
“Granholm, congressional delegation push jobs plan.” 2005. Gongwer News Service, November 16. www.gongwer.com (November 3, 2014).Google Scholar
Granholm, Jennifer, and Mulhern, Dan. 2011. A Governor's Story: The Fight for Jobs and America's Economic Future. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
Hammond, Thomas H. and Butler, Christopher K.. 2003. “Some Complex Answers to the Simple Question ‘Do Institutions Matter?’ Policy Choice and Policy Change in Presidential and Parliamentary Systems.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 15 (2): 145–200.Google Scholar
Herzberg, Roberta Q. 1996. “Unity versus Divisions: The Effect of Divided Government on Policy Development.” In Divided Government: Change, Uncertainty, and the Constitutional Order, ed. Galderisi, Peter F.. Lanham MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Hooghe, Liesbet, Marks, Gary and Schakel, Arjan H.. 2010. The Rise of Regional Authority: A Comparative Study of 42 Democracies. Oxon UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Howell, William, Adler, Scott, Cameron, Charles and Riemann, Charles. 2000. “Divided Government and the Legislative Productivity of Congress, 1945–94.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 25 (2): 285–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hueglin, Thomas O. and Fenna, Alan. 2006. Comparative Federalism: A Systematic Inquiry. Toronto: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
Immergut, Ellen M. 1990. “Institutions, Veto Points, and Policy Results: A Comparative Analysis of Health Care.” Journal of Public Policy 10 (4): 391–416.Google Scholar
Immergut, Ellen M. 2006. “Institutional Constraints on Policy.” In The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, ed. Moran, Michael, Rein, Martin and Goodin, Robert E.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Kirk. 2011. “In State Capitals, Officials Take Recovery Into Their Own Hands,” New York Times, August 6, A12.Google Scholar
Jones, Allison. 2008. “Automakers Hold Off on Asking Province for Aid.” www.thestar.com/news/canada/2008/11/14/automakers_hold_off_on_asking_province_for_aid.html (November 6, 2014).Google Scholar
Keenan, Greg. 2008. “Ontario's Auto Parts Bleeding Continues.” The Globe and Mail, February 12, B1.Google Scholar
Kelly, Sean Q. 1993. “Divided We Govern? A Reassessment.” Polity 25 (3): 475–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keman, Hans. 2000. “Federalism and Policy Performance: A Conceptual and Empirical Inquiry.” In Federalism and Political Performance, ed. Wachendorfer-Schmidt, Ute. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 1998. Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
LaFaive, Michael and Hohman, James. 2009. The Michigan Economic Development Corporation: A Review and Analysis. Midland MI: Mackinac Center for Public Policy.Google Scholar
LaMore, Rex L., Gandhi, Jimish, Melcher, John, Supanich-Goldner, Faron and Wilkes, Kyle. 2005. “Metropolitan Michigan Knowledge Economy Indicators.” Michigan State University Community and Economic Development Program. http://ced.msu.edu/upload/reports/Metro%20Michigan%20Knowledge%20Economy%20Final.pdf (August 7, 2014).Google Scholar
Legislative Assembly of Ontario. 2008. Official Report of Debates, May 13. http://www.ontla.on.ca/house-proceedings/transcripts/files_pdf/13-MAY-2008_L044.pdf (November 6, 2014).Google Scholar
Legislative Assembly of Ontario. 2009. Official Report of Debates, February 26. http://ontla.on.ca/house-proceedings/transcripts/files_pdf/26-FEB-2009_L115.pdf (November 6, 2014).Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1971. “Comparative Politics and Comparative Method.” American Political Science Review 65 (3): 682–93.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1984. Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-one Countries. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Luke, Peter. 2009. “Gov. Jennifer Granholm signs last of 2010 budget bills: ‘State government will not shut down’.” Mlive.com, October 30. http://www.mlive.com/politics/index.ssf/2009/10/gov_jennifer_granholm_signs_la.html (November 3, 2014).Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 2005. Divided We Govern: Party Control, Lawmaking, and Investigations, 1946–2002. 2nd ed. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Michigan Future. 2006. A New Agenda for a New Michigan. http://www.michiganfuture.org/cms/assets/uploads/2014/07/NewAgendaFINAL.pdf (November 6, 2014).Google Scholar
OECD. n.d. Fiscal Decentralisation Database, tables 5 and 7. http://www.oecd.org/tax/federalism/oecdfiscaldecentralisationdatabase.htm (August 16, 2014).Google Scholar
Ontario. 2007. Ministry of Training, Colleges, and Universities. The Ontario Labour Market in 2007. http://www.tcu.gov.on.ca/eng/labourmarket/currenttrends/docs/annual/annual2007.pdf (November 6, 2014).Google Scholar
Ontario. 2009. Ministry of Training, Colleges, and Universities. Current Labour Market Statistics 9:1.Google Scholar
Ontario Ministry of Finance. 2005. Toward 2025: Assessing Ontario's Long-Term Outlook. http://www.fin.gov.on.ca/en/economy/ltr/2005/05_ltr.html (November 6, 2014).Google Scholar
Ontario Ministry of Finance. 2007. http://news.ontario.ca/archive/en/2007/12/13/McGuinty-government-invests-3-billion-to-support-a-competitive-Ontario.html (November 6, 2014).Google Scholar
Pratt, Elizabeth and Tyszkiewicz, Maria. 2007. Cool Cities. State of Michigan. Lansing MI: Senate Fiscal Agency.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D., with Leonardi, Robert and Nanetti, Raffaella. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rieselbach, Leroy N. 1996. “It's the Constitution, Stupid! Congress, the President, Divided Government, and Policymaking.” In Divided Government: Change, Uncertainty, and the Constitutional Order, ed. Galderisi, Peter F.. Lanham MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Rogers, James R. 2005. “The Impact of Divided Government on Legislative Production.” Public Choice 123: 217–33.Google Scholar
Simeon, Richard, and Radin, Beryl A.. 2010. “Reflections on Comparing Federalisms: Canada and the United States.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 40 (3): 357–65.Google Scholar
Simeon, Richard, and Willis, Elaine. 1997. “Democracy and Performance: Governance in Canada and the United States.” In Degrees of Freedom: Canada and the United States in a Changing World, ed. Banting, Keith, Hoberg, George and Simeon, Richard. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.Google Scholar
Tax Foundation. 2012. “2013 State Business Tax Climate Index.” Background paper 64. http://taxfoundation.org/sites/default/files/docs/2013_Index.pdf (August 7, 2014).Google Scholar
Thorlakson, Lori. 2003. “Comparing Federal Institutions: Power and Representation in Six Federations.” West European Politics 26 (2): 1–22.Google Scholar
Tomblin, Stephen G. 2000. “Federal Constraints and Regional Integration in Canada.” In Federalism and Political Performance, ed. Wachendorfer-Schmidt, Ute. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tsebelis, George. 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tsebelis, George and Money, Jeanette. 1997. Bicameralism. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. 2014. GDP by State. www.bea.gov/regional/ (July 14, 2014).Google Scholar
Van Praet, Nicolas. 2007. “Ontario gives $3B in breaks to industry.” Financial Post, December 14, FP4.Google Scholar
Wachendorfer-Schmidt, Ute, ed. 2000. Federalism and Political Performance. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Watts, Ronald L. 1987. “The American Constitution in Comparative Perspective: A Comparison of Federalism in the United States and Canada.” Journal of American History 74: 769–92.Google Scholar
Wilson, James Q. 1994. Panelist, Roundtable on Robert Putnam's Making Democracy Work. Annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, New York.Google Scholar