Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T04:23:07.086Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Origins of Political Attitudes and Behaviours: An Analysis Using Twins

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 December 2009

Edward Bell*
Affiliation:
Brescia University College
Julie Aitken Schermer*
Affiliation:
University of Western Ontario
Philip A. Vernon*
Affiliation:
University of Western Ontario
*
Edward Bell, Department of Sociology, Brescia University College (at The University of Western Ontario), 1285 Western Road, London ON N6G 1H2, eabell@uwo.ca.
Julie Aitken Schermer, Management and Organizational Studies, The University of Western Ontario, London ON N6A 5C2, jharris@uwo.ca.
Philip A. Vernon, Department of Psychology, The University of Western Ontario, London ON N6A 5C2, vernon@uwo.ca.

Abstract

Abstract. This article provides a behaviour genetic heritability analysis of several political issues, including social and economic conservatism, general interest in politics, attitudes toward the major Canadian federal parties, federal party identification and national vote choice. Substantial genetic effects were found for four of six political attitude scales, with heritability values ranging from 41 per cent to 73 per cent. Genetic effects are also reported for several individual items (including feelings toward the major federal parties, party identification and vote choice), with heritabilities from 33 per cent to 62 per cent. The implications of these results for conventional political analyses are explored. Also presented is a theoretical interpretation of political heritability that is derived from an evolutionary perspective which suggests that political personalities or temperaments have evolved that are analogous to the heritable personality structures proposed by psychologists.

Résumé. Cet article propose une analyse sur l'héritabilité de la génétique du comportement concernant plusieurs questions politiques, y compris le conservatisme social et économique, l'intérêt général pour la politique, les attitudes envers les principaux partis fédéraux canadiens, l'identification à un parti et le choix de vote au niveau national. Des effets génétiques notables ont été recensés pour quatre des échelles politiques d'attitude sur six, les taux d'héritabilité s'étendant de 41 pour cent à 73 pour cent. Des effets génétiques ont également été recensés pour plusieurs autres éléments étudiés (y compris les sentiments envers les principaux partis fédéraux, l'identification à un parti et le choix de vote), les taux d'héritabilité allant cette fois-ci de 33 pour cent à 62 pour cent. Cette étude explore l'incidence de ces résultats sur des analyses politiques conventionnelles. Il s'agit aussi d'une interprétation théorique de l'héritabilité politique dérivant d'une perspective évolutionnaire, qui suggère que les personnalités ou les tempéraments politiques ont évolué et que ces derniers sont analogues aux structures de personnalité transmissibles proposées par les psychologues.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adorno, T., Frankel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. and Sanford, R.. 1950. The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Alford, John R., Funk, Carolyn L. and Hibbing, John R.. 2005. “Are Political Orientations Genetically Transmitted?American Political Science Review 99 (2): 153–67.Google Scholar
Alford, John R., Funk, Carolyn L. and Hibbing, John R.. 2008. “Beyond Liberals and Conservatives to Political Genotypes and Phenotypes.” Perspectives on Politics 6 (2): 321–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alford, John R. and Hibbing, John R.. 2004. “The Origin of Politics: An Evolutionary Theory of Political Behaviour.” Perspectives on Politics 2 (4): 707–23.Google Scholar
Alford, John R. and Hibbing, John R.. 2005. “Biology and Rational Choice.” The Political Economist (Newsletter of the section on political economy, American Political Science Association) 12 (5): 19.Google Scholar
Alford, John R. and Hibbing, John R.. 2007a. “Is politics in our genes?Tidsskriftet Politik February.Google Scholar
Alford, John R. and Hibbing, John R.. 2007b. “Personal, Interpersonal and Political Temperaments.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 614 (November): 196212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldus, Bernd. 2006. “Evolution, Agency and Sociology.” In Missing the Revolution: Darwinism for Social Scientists, ed. Barkow, J.H.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barkow, Jerome H. 2006. “Introduction: Sometimes the Bus Does Wait.” In Missing the Revolution: Darwinism for Social Scientists, ed. Barkow, J.H.. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bashevkin, Sylvia. 1993. Toeing the Lines: Women and Party Politics in English Canada. Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Berelson, Bernard, Lazarsfeld, P.F. and McPhee, W.N.. 1954. Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Blais, André. 2005. “Accounting for the Electoral Success of the Liberal Party in Canada.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 38 (4): 821–40.Google Scholar
Blake, Donald. 1988. “Division and Cohesion: The Major Parties.” In Party Democracy in Canada, ed. Perlin, George. Scarborough, Ontario: Prentice-Hall Canada.Google Scholar
Blute, Marion. 1997. “History versus Science: The Evolutionary Solution.” Canadian Journal of Sociology 22 (3): 345–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boehm, Christopher. 1999. Hierarchy in the Forest: The Evolution of Egalitarian Behaviour. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourchard, T.J. and McGue, M.. 2003. “Genetic and environmental influences on human psychological differences.” Journal of Neurobiology 54: 445.Google Scholar
Bourchard, T.J. Jr., Segal, N., Tellegen, A., McGue, M., Keyes, M. and Krueger, R.. 2003. “Evidence for the construct validity and heritability of the Wilson-Patterson conservatism scale: a reared-apart twins study of social attitudes.” Personality and Individual Differences 34: 959–69.Google Scholar
Campbell, A., Converse, P., Miller, W. and Stokes, D.. 1960. The American Voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Campbell, Colin and Christian, William. 1996. Parties, Leaders, and Ideologies in Canada. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.Google Scholar
Carey, Gregory. 2003. Human Genetics for the Social Sciences. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Carmen, Ira H. 2006. “Genetic Configurations of Political Phenomena: New Theories, New Methods.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 614 (November): 3455.Google Scholar
Christian, William and Campbell, Colin. 1990. Political Parties and Ideologies in Canada. 3rd ed.Toronto: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Clarke, Harold D., Jenson, J., LeDuc, L. and Pammett, J.H.. 1979. Political Choice in Canada. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.Google Scholar
Clarke, Harold D., Jenson, J., LeDuc, L. and Pammett, J.H.. 1984. Absent Mandate: The Politics of Discontent in Canada. Toronto: Gage.Google Scholar
Clarke, Harold D., Jenson, J., LeDuc, L. and Pammett, J.H.. 1991. Absent Mandate: Interpreting Change in Canadian Elections. 2nd ed.Toronto: Gage.Google Scholar
Clarke, Harold D., Jenson, J., LeDuc, L. and Pammett, J.H.. 1996. Absent Mandate: Canadian Electoral Politics In an Era of Restructuring. 3rd ed.Toronto: Gage.Google Scholar
Corning, Peter A. 1971. “The Biological Bases of Behaviour and Some Implications for Political Science.” World Politics 23 (3): 321–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, William and Young, Lisa. 2002. “Policy Attitudes of Party Members in Canada: Evidence of Ideological Politics.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 35 (4): 859–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawes, Christopher T. and Fowler, J.H.. 2009. “Partisanship, Voting and the Dopamine D2 Receptor Gene.” Journal of Politics 71 (3): 11571171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, R.M. 1970. The Government of Canada, rev. Ward, Norman. 5th ed.Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Dietz, Thomas, Burns, T.R. and Buttel, F.H.. 1990. “Evolutionary Theory in Sociology: An Examination of Current Thinking.” Sociological Forum 5 (2): 155–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Eaves, L.J. and Eysenck, H.J.. 1974. “Genetics and the development of social attitudes.” Science 249 (May): 288–89.Google Scholar
Eaves, L.J., Martin, N., Heath, A., Schieken, R., Meyer, J., Silberg, J., Neale, M. and Corey, L.. 1997. “Age Changes in the Causes of Individual Differences in Conservatism.” Behaviour Genetics 27 (2): 121–24.Google Scholar
Eaves, L.J., Heath, A.C., Martin, N.G., Maes, H.H., Neale, M.C., Kendler, K.S., Kirk, K.M. and Corey, L.. 1999. “Comparing the biological and cultural inheritance of personality and social attitudes in the Virginia 30,000 study twins and their relatives.” Twin Research 2: 6280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feather, N.T. 1978. “Family resemblances in conservatism: Are daughters more similar to parents than sons are?Journal of Personality 46: 260–78.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fowler, James H., Baker, L.A. and Dawes, C.T.. 2008. “Genetic Variation in Political Participation.” American Political Science Review 102 (2): 233–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, James H. and Dawes, C.T.. 2008. “Two Genes Predict Voter Turnout.” Journal of Politics 70 (3): 579–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gidengil, Elisabeth, Blais, A., Everitt, J., Fournier, P. and Nevitte, N.. 2006. “Is the Concept of Party Identification Applicable in Canada? A Panel-Based Analysis.” Paper presented at the ECPR 34th joint sessions of workshops, Nicosia.Google Scholar
Hatemi, Peter K. 2007. The Genetics of Political Attitudes. Doctoral dissertation. University of Nebraska, Lincoln.Google Scholar
Hatemi, Peter K, Alford, J.R., Hibbing, J.R., Keller, M.C., Martin, N.G., Medland, S.E. and Eaves, L.J.. 2007. “Not by Twins Alone: Using the Extended Twin Family Design to Investigate the Genetic Basis of Political Beliefs.” Paper prepared for the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Hatemi, Peter K., Medland, S.E., Morley, K.I., Heath, A.C. and Martin, N.G.. 2007. “The Genetics of Voting: An Australian Twin Study.” Behaviour Genetics 37: 435–48.Google Scholar
Hibbing, John R. and Alford, John R.. 2004. “Accepting Authoritative Decisions: Humans as Wary Co-operators.” American Journal of Political Science 48 (1): 6276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hibbing, John R. and Smith, Kevin B.. 2007. “The Biology of Political Behaviour: An Introduction.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 614 (November): 614.Google Scholar
Jenson, Jane. 1975. “Party Loyalty in Canada: The Question of Party Identification.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 8 (4): 543–53.Google Scholar
Johnston, Richard. 1985. “The Reproduction of Religious Cleavage in Canadian Elections.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 18 (1): 99113.Google Scholar
Johnston, Richard. 1988. “The Ideological Structure of Opinion on Policy.” In Party Democracy in Canada, ed. Perlin, George. Scarborough, Ontario: Prentice-Hall Canada.Google Scholar
Jost, John T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A.W. and Sulloway, F.J.. 2003. “Political Conservatism as Motivated Social Cognition.” Psychological Bulletin 129 (3): 339–75.Google Scholar
Key, V.O. 1966. The Responsible Electorate: Rationality in Presidential Voting 1936–60. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kluegel, J.R. and Smith, E.R.. 1986. Beliefs about Inequality. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Laponce, Jean. 1981. Left and Right: The Topography of Political Perceptions. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Layman, Geoffrey C. and Carsey, Thomas M.. 2002. “Party Polarization and ‘Conflict Extension’ in the American Electorate.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (4): 786802.Google Scholar
Loehlin, John C. 1993. “Nature, Nurture, and Conservatism in the Australian Twin Study.” Behaviour Genetics 23 (3): 287–90.Google Scholar
Lumsden, C.J. and Wilson, E.O.. 1981. Genes, Mind, and Culture: The Coevolutionary Process. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lupia, Arthur and McCubbins, M.D.. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need To Know? New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Markus, G. 1990. Measuring Popular Individualism. Report to the Board of Overseers for the American National Election Studies.Google Scholar
Martin, N.G., Eaves, L.J., Heath, A.C., Jardine, R., Feingold, L.M. and Eysenck, H.J.. 1986. “Transmission of social attitudes.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 83 (June): 4364–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Massey, Douglas S. 2000. “What I don't know about my field but wish I did.” Annual Review of Sociology 26: 699701.Google Scholar
McClosky, H. and Zaller, J.. 1984. The American Ethos. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McCourt, K., Bouchard, T.J. Jr., Lykken, D.T., Tellegen, A. and Keyes, M.. 1999. “Authoritarianism revisited: genetic and environmental influences examined in twins reared apart and together.” Personality and Individual Differences 27: 9851014.Google Scholar
Meisel, John. 1973. Working Papers on Canadian Politics. Enlarged ed.Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Mirels, H. and Garrett, J.. 1971. “The Protestant ethic as a personality variable.” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 36: 4044.Google Scholar
Neale, M. C. and Cardon, L.R.. 1992. Methodology for Genetic Studies of Twins and Families. Norwell MA: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Neale, M. C., Boker, S.M., Xie, G., and Maes, H.H. 2006. Mx: Statistical Modeling Manual. 7th ed.Richmond, VA: Department of Psychiatry, Medical College of Virginia.Google Scholar
Nieuwbeerta, Paul. 1996. “The Democratic Class Struggle in Postwar Societies: Class Voting in Twenty Countries, 1945–1990.” Acta Sociologica 39: 345–83.Google Scholar
Nolan, Patrick and Lenski, G.. 2004. Human Societies: An Introduction to Macrosociology. 9th ed.Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
Ogmundson, Rick. 1975. “Party Class Images and the Class Vote in Canada.” American Sociological Review 40: 506–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orbell, John. 2005. “Science, Anti-Science and Rational Choice.” The Political Economist (Newsletter of the section on political economy, American Political Science Association). 12 (5): 111.Google Scholar
Oxley, D.R., Smith, K.B., Alford, J.R., Hibbing, M.V., Miller, J.L., Scalora, M., Hatemi, P.K. and Hibbing, J.R.. 2008. “Political Attitudes Vary with Physiological Traits.” Science 321 (19): 1667–70.Google Scholar
Pammett, Jon H. 1987. “Class Voting and Class Consciousness in Canada.” Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology 24 (2): 269–90.Google Scholar
Plomin, R., DeFries, J., McClearn, G. and McGuffin, P.. 2008. Behavioural Genetics. 5th ed.New York: Worth.Google Scholar
Popkin, Samuel L. 1991. The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richerson, P.J. and Boyd, R.. 2005. Not By Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ridley, Matt. 2003. Nature via Nurture: Genes, Experience and What Makes Us Human. London: Fourth Estate.Google Scholar
Sanderson, Stephen K. 2001. The Evolution of Human Sociality: A Darwinian Conflict Perspective. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Scarr, S. and Weinberg, R.A.. 1981. “The transmission of authoritarianism in families: genetic resemblance in social-political attitudes?” In Race, Social Class and Individual Differences in IQ, ed. Scarr, S.. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Sesardic, Neven. 2005. Making Sense of Heritability. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Settle, J.E., Dawes, C.T., Christakis, N.A. and Fowler, J.H.. 2008. “Friendships Moderate an Association Between the DRD4 Gene and Political Ideology.” Paper presented at the Behaviour Genetics Conference, Louisville, Kentucky.Google Scholar
Sniderman, Paul M., Forbes, H.D. and Melzer, I.. 1974. “Party Loyalty and Electoral Volatility: A Study of the Canadian Party System.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 7 (2): 268–88.Google Scholar
Stephenson, Laura B., Kornberg, A. and Scotto, T.J.. 2004. “Slip, sliding away or le plus ca change … : Canadian and American partisanship in comparative perspective.” The American Review of Canadian Studies 34 (2): 283312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, John L, Fried, A. and Dietz, M.G.. 1992. “Patriotism, Politics, and the Presidential Election of 1988.” American Journal of Political Science 36 (1): 200–34.Google Scholar
Tabachnick, B. G. and Fidell, L.S.. 2001. Using multivariate statistics. 4th ed.Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Truett, K.R., Eaves, L.J., Meyer, J.M., Heath, A.C. and Martin, N.G.. 1992. “Religion and Education as Mediators of Attitudes: A Multivariate Analysis.” Behaviour Genetics 22 (1): 4362.Google Scholar
van den Berghe, Pierre L. 1973. Age and Sex in Human Societies: A Biosocial Perspective. Belmont: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
van den Berghe, Pierre L. 1978. Man in Society: A Biosocial View. 2nd ed.New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
van den Berghe, Pierre L. 1990. “Why Most Sociologists Don't (and Won't) Think Evolutionarily.” Sociological Forum 5 (2): 173–85.Google Scholar
Vernon, P.A., Martin, R.A., Schermer, J.A. and Mackie, A.. 2008. “A behavioural genetic investigation of humour styles and their correlations with the big five personality dimensions.” Personality and Individual Differences 44: 1116–25.Google Scholar
Wilson, G.D. 1975. Manual for the Wilson-Patterson Attitude Inventory (WPAI). Windsor, UK: NFER Publishing.Google Scholar
Young, Lisa. 2000. Feminists and Party Politics. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar