Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T09:15:14.436Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Script Concordance Test

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2014

A. Keith  and
W. Brownell
A. Keith
Affiliation:
Calgary, Alberta
W. Brownell
Affiliation:
Calgary, Alberta
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , May 2009 , pp. 272 - 273
Copyright
Copyright © The Canadian Journal of Neurological 2009

References

1. Lubarsky, S, Chalk, C, Kazitani, D, Gagnon, R, Charlin, B. The script concordance test: a new tool and assessing clinical judgment in neurology. Can J Neurol Sci. 2009;36:326–31.Google Scholar
2. Johnson, EJ. Expertise and decision under uncertainty: performance and process. In: Chi, MTH, Glaser, R, Farr, MJ, editors. The nature of expertise. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1998. p. 409–25.Google Scholar
3. Schön, DA. The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books; 1983.Google Scholar
4. Charlin, B, Roy, L, Brailovsky, C, Goulet, F, van der Vleuten, C. The script concordance test: a tool to assess the reflective clinician. Teach Learn Med. 2000;12(4):189–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Charlin, B, van der Vleuten, C. Standardized assessment of reasoning in contexts of uncertainty. Eval Health Prof. 2007;27(3):304–19.Google Scholar
6. Charlin, B, Boshuizen, HPA, Custers, EJ, Feltovich, PJ. Scripts and clinical reasoning. Med Educ. 2007;41:1178–84.Google Scholar