Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T22:56:29.977Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Neurological Advocate?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2014

Michael I. Shevell
Michael I. Shevell*
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology/Neurosurgery & Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Neurology, McGill University; Montreal Children's Hospital - McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
*
Room A-514, Montreal Children's Hospital, 2300 Tupper, Montreal, Quebec, H3H 1P3, Canada.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentary
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 35 , Issue 5 , November 2008 , pp. 542 - 543
Copyright
Copyright © The Canadian Journal of Neurological 2008

References

1. Human Development Reports. http://hdr.undp.org/en/statistics/Google Scholar
2. Oxford English Dictionary. http://www.oed.comGoogle Scholar
3. Schwartz, L. Is there an advocate in the house? The role of health care professionals in patient advocacy. J Med Ethics. 2002;28: 37–40.Google Scholar
4. Caplan, A. The ethics of gatekeeping in rehabilitation medicine. J Head Trauma Rehab. 1997;12L:29–36.Google Scholar
5. Rawls, J. Justice on Fairness: A Restatement. Harvard University Press: Boston Massachusetts, 2001.Google Scholar
6. Leon, DA, Walt, G. Poverty, Inequality and Health: An International Perspective. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2001.Google Scholar
7. International Classification of Functioning, Disability & Health (ICF). http:www.edc.gov/nchs/about/otheract/icd9/icfhome.htmGoogle Scholar
8. CMA Code of Ethics (Updated 2004). http://www.cma.caGoogle Scholar
9. Editorial: Physicians & Advocacy. CMAJ. 2005;172:1413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar