Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qlrfm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T02:05:50.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dislodged Clot During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: From the Heart to the Brain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2020

Jose Danilo B. Diestro*
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Imaging, Division of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Neuroradiology, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Rahul Bhindi
Affiliation:
Division of Cardiology, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Johnston T. Te Jr.
Affiliation:
University of Santo Tomas Hospital, Manila, Philippines
Carmen Parra-Farinas
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Imaging, Division of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Neuroradiology, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Michael J. Kutryk
Affiliation:
Division of Cardiology, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Thomas R. Marotta
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Imaging, Division of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Neuroradiology, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
*
Correspondence to: Jose Danilo B. Diestro, St. Michael’s Hospital, Medical Imaging Room CC3-141, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ONM5B 1W8, Canada. Email: danni.diestro@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Neuroimaging Highlights
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences Inc.

Among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), large series have documented the incidence of post-PCI ischemic stroke to be 0.1–0.56%. Although the complication is uncommon, stroke in this subset of patients is associated with increased in-hospital mortality, longer hospital stay, and poorer discharge outcomes.Reference Fuchs, Stabile and Kinnaird1Reference Alkhouli, Alqahtani, Tarabishy, Sandhu and Rihal3

The patient is a 59-year-old male who was previously well until he developed progressive dyspnea over 3 days. He was diagnosed with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). He did not have hypertension or diabetes, but had a preexisting diagnosis of Ebstein’s anomaly. He underwent PCI 6 days after symptom onset. The left circumflex artery with a 70% mid-vessel stenosis was stented. The right coronary artery (RCA) was totally occluded proximally by thrombus. After a second balloon dilation (2.0 × 20 mm Sprinter Legend Balloon, Medtronic), the thrombus disappeared (see Figure 1A–B). After stent placement in the RCA, the patient became agitated and subsequently confused. The symptoms were attributed to periprocedural sedation. In recovery, he became dysarthric; consequently, a code stroke was called. He had an NIHSS of 7 (aphasia and dysarthria). He was unable to follow commands and spoke gibberish. The initial plain cranial CT showed an Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) of 6 (left insula, M2, M3, and M6) and an occlusion at the left M1–M2 junction. He underwent successful (TICI 3) thrombectomy with a combined stent retriever (4 × 40 mm Solitaire, Medtronic) and aspiration (ACE 68, Penumbra) approach (see Figure 1C–F). Three months later, he only had moderate expressive aphasia.

Figure 1: Cardioembolic right coronary artery (RCA) clot going to the left middle cerebral artery. (A) Angiography demonstrating a thrombus (white arrow) in the proximal portion of the RCA. (B) After balloon inflation, the thrombus has disappeared. (C) Cerebral catheter angiography demonstrates a thrombus (white arrow) in the M1–M2 junction of the left middle cerebral artery. (D) TICI 3 reperfusion of the left middle cerebral artery after endovascular thrombectomy. (E) Mature clot (white arrow) in the stent retriever and the aspiration catheter.

Risk factors associated with stroke during PCI include the use of an intra-aortic balloon pump, carotid disease, atrial fibrillation, STEMI, previous valvular heart disease, and older age.Reference Fuchs, Stabile and Kinnaird1Reference Alkhouli, Alqahtani, Tarabishy, Sandhu and Rihal3 Only valvular disease (Ebstein’s anomaly) was present in our patient. Known mechanisms for perioperative stroke during PCI include atheroma dislodgment from the aortic arch, clot forming around catheters, and intraprocedural hypotension causing watershed infarcts.Reference Fuchs, Stabile and Kinnaird1 We believe that the radiographic documentation and temporal progression of symptoms in our case support an intraprocedural embolization from the RCA to the left middle cerebral artery as a very rare mechanism causing our patient’s stroke. There has only been one similar report of such occurrence.Reference Villoth, Muralidharan, Bhaskar Naidu and Senguttuvan4 However, the possibility of a coronary artery embolus causing a stroke was tenuous in this case, with the stroke symptoms occurring 24 h after PCI. There are two potential mechanisms for the retrograde embolization of the thrombus from the coronary artery. Inflation of the undersized pre-dilatation balloon at the distal end of the fusiform mature thrombus may have caused it to jettison retrogradely out of the ostium of the RCA. Alternatively, following balloon inflation, the thrombus may have been dragged out of the coronary artery adhered to the deployed balloon following the pre-dilatation. Following undersized balloon inflation, the totally occluded artery was widely patent with no evidence of in situ thrombus, or distal embolization of thrombus.

Patients with in-hospital stroke were found to have longer onset-to-needle times compared to those with community-onset strokes.Reference Saltman, Silver, Fang, Stamplecoski and Kapral5 The case (symptom-to-groin 155 min) demonstrates that a lower threshold for the activation of a hospital’s code stroke protocol may have led to earlier reperfusion and better subsequent neurologic outcome. The dramatic treatment effect of mechanical thrombectomy for strokes,Reference Goyal, Menon and van Zwam6 emphasizes the importance of early intervention.

Disclosures

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Statement of Authorship

JDBD, RB, JTT, CPF, MJK, and TRM all made substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work and drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content. JDBD, RB, JTT, CPF, MJK, and TRM are all responsible for the final approval of the version to be published. JDBD, RB, JTT, CPF, MJK, and TRM are all in agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

References

Fuchs, S, Stabile, E, Kinnaird, TD, et al. Stroke complicating percutaneous coronary interventions. Circulation [Internet]. 2002 Jul 2;106(1):8691. Available at: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/01.CIR.0000020678.16325.E0 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kwok, CS, Kontopantelis, E, Myint, PK, et al. Stroke following percutaneous coronary intervention: type-specific incidence, outcomes and determinants seen by the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society 2007-12. Eur Heart J [Internet]. 2015 Jul 1;36(25):1618–28. Available at: https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv181 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alkhouli, M, Alqahtani, F, Tarabishy, A, Sandhu, G, Rihal, CS. Incidence, predictors, and outcomes of acute ischemic stroke following percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv [Internet]. 2019 Aug;12(15):1497–506. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S193687981930929X CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Villoth, SG, Muralidharan, TR, Bhaskar Naidu, P, Senguttuvan, NB. Stroke in percutaneous coronary intervention – Atherothrombosis that licked heart but bit brain. IHJ Cardiovasc Case Reports [Internet]. 2018 Dec;2:S1015. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2468600X18300999 Google Scholar
Saltman, AP, Silver, FL, Fang, J, Stamplecoski, M, Kapral, MK. Care and outcomes of patients with in-hospital stroke. JAMA Neurol [Internet]. 2015 Jul 1;72(7):749. Available at: http://archneur.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?doi=10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.0284 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goyal, M, Menon, BK, van Zwam, WH, et al. Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomized trials. Lancet [Internet]. 2016 Apr;387(10029):1723–31. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S014067361600163X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1: Cardioembolic right coronary artery (RCA) clot going to the left middle cerebral artery. (A) Angiography demonstrating a thrombus (white arrow) in the proximal portion of the RCA. (B) After balloon inflation, the thrombus has disappeared. (C) Cerebral catheter angiography demonstrates a thrombus (white arrow) in the M1–M2 junction of the left middle cerebral artery. (D) TICI 3 reperfusion of the left middle cerebral artery after endovascular thrombectomy. (E) Mature clot (white arrow) in the stent retriever and the aspiration catheter.