Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T01:30:57.286Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Successive Approximations in Second Language Phonology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Terry Piper
Terry Piper*
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Research in second language phonology has, until recently at least, been principally concerned with the interference of the learner’s first language in his acquisition of a new sound system. In practice, the belief that interference from the first language is the major source of pronunciation problems is well established among second language teachers, and teachers have traditionally been trained to recognize and remedy, if not try to prevent, the errors resulting from this interference. Recently, however, researchers (for example, Garnica and Herbert 1979) have begun to conclude that interference is not a sufficient explanation, and that the second language learner’s developing phonology, his approximative system, is undoubtedly influenced by many other factors.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , Fall 1984 , pp. 135 - 156
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burt, M.K., Dulay, H., and Hernandez, G.E. 1975 Bilingual Syntax Measure. New York: Harcourt.Google Scholar
Briere, , Eugene, J. 1966 An Investigation of Phonological Interference. Language 42:768–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, James E. 1980 Phonetic Approximation in Second Language Acquisition. Language Learning 30:117–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, James E. 1981 The Phonological Basis of Foreign Accent: A Hypothesis. TFSOL Quarterly 15:443–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garnica, Olga K. and Herbert, Robert K. 1979 Some Phonological Errors in Second Language Learning: Interference Doesn’t Tell it All. International Journal of Psycholinguistics 6:5–19.Google Scholar
Ingram, David 1979 Phonological Patterns in the Speech of Young Children. Pp. 133–148 in Language Acquisition. Fletcher, P. and Garman, M., eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ingram, David 1981 Procedures for the Phonological Analysis of Children’s Language. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Locke, John 1969 Experimentally-elicited Articulatory Behavior. Language and Speech 12:187–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nemser, William 1971 Approximative Systems of Foreign Language Learners. International Review of Applied Linguistics 9:115–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piper, Terry 1983 Observations on the Second Language Acquisition of the English Sound System. To appear in Canadian Modern Language Review 40.Google Scholar
Piper, Terry 1984 Phonological Processes in ESL Five-year-olds. TESL Canada Journal 1:71–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, Gloria 1978 A Model for Second Languge Learning. Canadian Modern Language Review 34:442–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Neilson V. 1973 The Acquisition of Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar