Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T02:21:22.397Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the putative rule of sentence-lifting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Deborah M. James  and
Robert I. Binnick
Deborah M. James
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Robert I. Binnick
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Sentences like the following are basically the same in meaning (although not absolutely the same).

  • (1) I believe Ralph came

  • (2) Ralph came, I believe

These have been described by Green and Morgan (1972) and Hooper and Thompson (1973) as related by a transformational rule of Sentence-Lifting or Complement Preposing (to be abbreviated here as “Slifting”). By this hypothesized rule, an underlying embedded sentence, here “Ralph came,” is raised so that it precedes its higher subject and verb. Bolinger (1968) describes sentences such as (1) and (2) as related by a rule of Main Phrase Postposing, by which the material at the beginning of the sentence is moved to the end. None of these writers give any arguments for setting up the rule as they do.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , Fall 1976 , pp. 153 - 170
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bolinger, Dwight L. 1968 Postposed main phrases: an English rule for the Romance subjunc tive. CJL/RCL 14.3–30.(1968–69.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald & Harman, Gilbert (eds.) 1972 Semantics of Natural Language. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Emonds, J.E. 1969 Root and structure-preserving transformations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT. Reproduced in mimeograph by the Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Charles J., Fillmore & Langendoen, D. Terence (eds.) 1971 Studies in Linguistic Semantics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Green, G. M. & Morgan, J. L. 1972 A guide to the study of syntax. University of Illinois, duplicated.Google Scholar
Hooper, Joan B. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1973 On the applicability of root transformations. LI 4.465–97.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Roderick A. & Rosenbaum, Peter S. (eds.) 1970 Readings in English Transformational Grammar. Waltham: Ginn.Google Scholar
James, D.M. 1974 The syntax and semantics of some English interjections. University of Michigan Papers in Linguistics, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Karttunen, Lauri 1971 Some observations on factivity. PIL 4.55–69.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul & Kiparsky, Carol 1971 Fact. In Steinberg, & Jakobovits, , 1971:345–69.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George 1970 Pronominalization, negation, and the analysis of adverbs. In Jacobs, and Rosenbaum, , 1970:145–65.Google Scholar
Mccawley, James D. 1970 English as a VSO language. Language 46.286–99.Google Scholar
Mccawley, James D. 1971 Tense and time reference in English. In Fillmore, and Langendoen, , 1971:96–113.Google Scholar
Ross, J. R. 1967 Constraints on variables in syntax. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT. Reproduced in mimeograph by the Indiana Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Ross, J. R. 1974 Act. In Davidson, and Harman, , 1972:Google Scholar
Dong, Quang Phuc 1971 English sentences without overt grammatical subject. In Zwicky, et al., 1971:3–10.Google Scholar
Steinberg, D. D.& Jakobovits, L. A. (eds.) 1971 Semantics; An Interdisciplinary Reader in Philosophy, Linguistics, and Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge U.P.Google Scholar
Warshawsky, F. 1966 Reflexives I and II. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M. et al. (eds.) 1971 Studies out in Left Field; defamatory essays presented to James D. McCawley. Edmonton: Linguistic Research. [Current inquiry into language and linguistics, 4].Google Scholar