Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T18:57:00.590Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

[no title] - William O’Grady and Michael Dobrovolsky, eds. Contemporary Linguistic Analysis: An Introduction. Toronto: Copp Clark Pitman. 2nd ed. 1992. Pp. xv + 623 (softcover).

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Charles H. Ulrich
Charles H. Ulrich*
Affiliation:
Simon Fraser University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews/Comptes rendus
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 40 , Issue 1 , March 1995 , pp. 115 - 118
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

O’Grady, William, Dobrovolsky, Michael, and Aronoff, Mark. 1989. Contemporary Linguistics: An Introduction. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Haas, Mary R. 1941. The Classification of the Muskogean Languages. In Language, Culture, and Personality, ed. Spier, Leslie, Hallowell, A. Irving, and Newman, Stanley S., 41–56. Menasha, Wisconsin: Sapir Memorial Publication Fund.Google Scholar
Haas, Mary R. 1947. Development of Proto-Muskogean *kw. International Journal of American Linguistics 13:135–137.Google Scholar
Haas, Mary R. 1969. The Prehistory of Languages. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Munro, Pamela, et al. 1988. Muskogean Cognate Sets. Ms., University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar