Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T13:09:43.784Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The morphology and compositionality of particle verb constructions in Vincentian Creole

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Paula Prescod
Paula Prescod*
Affiliation:
Institut Picard de Langues, Amiens
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article provides a description of complex patterns in which a verb combines with a morphologically invariable particle to form a single grammatical and phonological unit in Vincentian creole (VinC). English is replete with what grammars refer to as phrasal and prepositional verbs. Speakers of VinC also resort to these patterns which appear to have retained meanings from English. The combinations investigated testify to some measure of morphological change. Additionally, their semantic outcomes are treated as innovations to the extent that they have either not been attested in English or have degrees of compositionality that differ from those of English items. Arguably, such phrasal combinations are not typically considered relevant to word formation, given that they do not form a unitary element from a grammatical perspective. Evidence is provided to show that combinations of verbs and particles in [V+P]v can be analyzed as a product of compounding.

Résumé

Résumé

Cet article propose une description de structures complexes en créole vincentien (VicC) où un verbe se combine avec une particule morphologiquement invariable pour constituer une seule unité grammaticale et phonologique. La langue anglaise est riche de ce que les grammairiens appellent verbes phrastiques ou prépositionnels. Les locuteurs du VinC ont également recours à ces constructions qui semblent avoir retenu certains sens de l’anglais. Les constructions examinées témoignent dans une certaine mesure d’un changement morphologique. En plus, leurs résultats sémantiques sont considérés comme des innovations dans la mesure où, soit le sens acquis est non attesté en anglais, soit il possède un degré de compositionalité différent de celui des items anglais. Ne formant pas un seul mot, ces combinaisons phrastiques ne seraient pas le produit d’un processus de formation lexicale. Toutefois, cet article apporte des preuves qui montrent que la construction [V+P]v peut être analysé en tant que résultat d’un processus de composition lexicale.

Keywords

Vincentian creolecompositionalityparticle verbsmorphologycompoundingcréole vincentiencompositionalitéverbes à particulesmorphologieverbes composés
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 56 , Issue 1 , March 2011 , pp. 87 - 107
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association/Association canadienne de linguistique 2011 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bauer, Laurie. 2003. Introducing linguistic morphology. 2nd edition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Emile. 1974. Problèmes de linguistique générale II Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: H. Holt and Co.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. 1971. The phrasal verb in English. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Braun, Maria and Plag, Ingo. 2002. How transparent is creole morphology? In Yearbook of Morphology 2002, ed. Booij, Geert and Marie, Jaap van, 81–104. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew. 2002. An introduction to headless morphology: Words and their structures. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Celcia-Murcia, Marianne and Larsen-Freeman, Diane. 1999. The grammar book: An ESUEFL teacher’s course. 2nd ed. Boston: Heinle and Heinle.Google Scholar
Darwin, Clayton and Gray, Loretta. 1999. Going after the phrasal verb: An alternative approach to classification. TESOL Quarterly 33:65–83.Google Scholar
DeGraff, Michel. 1992. Creole grammars and acquisition of syntax: The case of Haitian. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
DeGraff, Michel. 2003. Against creole exceptionalism. Language 79:391–410.Google Scholar
Dowty, David. 1996. Non-constituent coordination, wrapping, and multimodal categorical grammar. In Structures and norms in science, ed. Chiara, Maria Luisa Dalla, Doets, Kees, Mundici, Daniele, and Benthem, Johan van, 347–368. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Farrel, Patrick. 2005. English verb-preposition constructions: Constituency and order. Language 81:96–137.Google Scholar
Fowler, Henry. W. 1926. A dictionary of modern English usage. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce. 1976. The verb-particle combination in English. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hill, Archibald A. 1969. Verb and particle combinations. American Speech 44:210–215.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell, ed. 1971. Preface to Pidginization and creolization of languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Kyle. 1991. Object positions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9:577–639.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Arthur G. 1920. The modern English verb-adverb combination. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Kouwenberg, Silvia. 2010. Creole studies and linguistic typology. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 25:173–186.Google Scholar
Levy, Andrea. 2004. Small island. London: Headline Review.Google Scholar
Lohse, Barbara, Hawkins, John, and Wasow, Thomas. 2004. Domain minimization in English verb-particle constructions. Language 80:238–261.Google Scholar
Marchand, Hans. 1960. The categories and types of present-day English word-formation. Wiesbaden: O. Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Matthews, Peter H. 1974. Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John. 1982. Prosodic structure and expletive infixation. Language 58:574–590.Google Scholar
O’Dowd, Elizabeth. 1994. Prepositions and particles in English: A discourse-based, unifying account. Doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado, Boulder.Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven. 1994. The language instinct. London: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Plag, Ingo. 2003. Word formation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Prescod, Paula. 2004. Une description grammaticale du syntagme nominal dans le créole anglophone de St-Vincent-et-les-Grenadines. Doctoral dissertation, Université Paris 3. [ANRT: Lille. English translation: 2010. Munich: LINCOM Europa]Google Scholar
Prescod, Paula. 2008. The formation of deverbal nouns in Vincentian Creole: Morphophonological and syntactic processes. In Roots of creole structures: Weighing the contribution of substrates and superstrates, ed. Michaelis, Susanne, 333–355. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sydney, Leech, Geoffrey, and Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Rudzka-Ostyn, Brygida. 2003. Word power: Phrasal verbs and compounds: A cognitive approach. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Smith, Geoff. 2002. Growing up with Tok Pisin: Contact, creolization, and change in Papua New Guinea’s national language. London: Battlebridge Publications.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah Grey and Kaufman, Terrence. 1988. Language contact, creolisation and genetic linguistics. Oxford: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Topalov, Jagoda. 2008. Phrasal verbs and progressive aspect. Facta Universitatis: Series Linguistics and Literature 6:61–72.Google Scholar