Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-t6hkb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T03:20:02.855Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Morphological Conditioning in Phonologically Transparent Processes: Evidence from the Evolution of Vowel Reduction in Vinzelles Occitan1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Yves-Charles Morin
Yves-Charles Morin*
Affiliation:
Université de Montréal
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Does phonological conditioning have a privileged status in allomorphic alternations? Most synchronic descriptions appear to assume that if simple phonological conditions can account for some alternation, they automatically constitute the relevant factors chosen by speakers in their internalized grammars (but cf. Hooper 1976:87 or Klausenburger 1979:29–36 for divergent views). Intuitive notions of simplicity cannot provide a solution because simplicity is actually an empirical issue (cf. Chomsky 1965:37–47). The answer can only come from the analysis of external evidence, i.e., errors, language acquisition, historical changes, etc.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 33 , Issue 4: Special Issue: Linguistic Theory and External Evidence , December 1988 , pp. 431 - 442
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

I would like to thank my mentor Rajendra Singh for encouraging me to write this paper, and for the help provided in countless discussions. He is of course not responsible for any errors, mistakes and distortions which may still appear here.

References

Andersen, Henning 1973 Abductive and Deductive Change. Language 49:765–794.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1965 Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dauzat, Albert 1897 Phonétique historique du patois de Vinzelles (Puy-de-Dôme). Paris: Félix Alean.Google Scholar
Dauzat, Albert 1900 Morphologie du patois de Vinzelles. Paris: Emile Bouillon.Google Scholar
Ford, Alan, and Singh, Rajendra 1984 On the Status of Morphophonology. Pp. 63–78 in The Interplay of Phonology, Morphology and Syntax. Richardson, J. et al, eds. Chicago: Chigaco Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Hooper, Joan 1976 An Introduction to Natural Generative Phonology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Klausenburger, Jürgen 1979 Morphologization: Studies in Latin and Romance Morphophonology. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Linell, Per 1979 Psychological Reality in Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morin, Yves-Charles 1987 Remarques sur l’organisation de la flexion des verbes français. ITL. Review of Applied Linguistics 77-78:13–91.Google Scholar
Singh, Rajendra 1987 Well-Formedness Conditions and Phonological Theory. Pp. 273–285 in Phonologica 1984. Dressier, Wolfgang, Luschtzky, Hans C., Pfeiffer, Oskar E., and Rennison, John R., eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar