Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-06T10:09:59.636Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

John Archibald, ed. Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theory. Oxford: Blackwell. 2000. Pp. vii + 256. US$29.95 (softcover).

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Kathleen Connors*
Affiliation:
Université de Montréal

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews/Comptes rendus
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Birdsong, David. 1989. Metalinguistic performance and interlinguistic competence. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppieters, René. 1987. Competence differences between native and near-native speakers. Language 63:544573.Google Scholar
Krashen, Stephen D. 1976. Formal and informal linguistic environments in language learning and language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly 10:157168.Google Scholar
Krashen, Stephen D. 1980. Attitude and aptitude in relation to second language acquisition and learning. In Individual differences and universals in language learning aptitude, ed. Diller, Karl C., 155175. Rowley: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Paradis, Michel. 1978. The stratification of bilingualism. In Aspects of bilingualism, ed. Paradis, Michel, 165175. Columbia: Hornbeam Press.Google Scholar
White, Lydia. 1989. Universal grammar and second language acquisition. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Lydia. 1996. Universal grammar and second language acquisition: Current trends and new directions. In Handbook of language acquisition, ed. Ritchie, William C. and Bhatia, Tej K., 85120. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
White, Lydia, and Genesee, Fred. 1996. How native is near-native? The issue of ultimate attainment in adult second language acquisition. Second Language Research 12:238–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar