Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T06:47:13.268Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Editor’s Introduction: In Defense of External Evidence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Rajendra Singh
Rajendra Singh*
Affiliation:
Université de Montréal
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Introduction
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 33 , Issue 4: Special Issue: Linguistic Theory and External Evidence , December 1988 , pp. 329 - 343
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aoun, Yosef, and Sportiche, Dominique 1983 On the Formal Theory of Government. Linguistic Review 2:211–236.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark 1976 Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Botha, Rudolph P., 1970 The Justification of Linguistic Hypotheses. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Botha, Rudolph P., 1979a External Evidence in the Validation of Mentalistic Theories: A Chomskyan Paradox. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics 2:1–38.Google Scholar
Botha, Rudolph P., 1979b Methodological Bases of a Progressive Mentalism. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics 3.Google Scholar
Bouchard, Denis 1985 The Binding Theory and the Notion of Accessible Subject. Linguistic Inquiry 16:117–133.Google Scholar
Caplan, David 1983 The New Lexicon — A Summary of Some Arguments Pertaining to the Nature of Lexical Representation. Pp. 79–87 in The Psychobiology of Language. Studdert-Kennedy, Michael, ed. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cathey, James, and Demers, Richard 1976 On Establishing Linguistic Universale. Language 52:611–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1965 Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1980 Reply to McCawley. The Behavioural and Brain Sciences 3:47–48.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1986 Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Clark, Eve V. 1982 The Young Word-Maker: A Case-Study of Innovation in the Child’s Lexicon. Pp. 290–325 in Language Acquisition, the State of the Art. Wanner, Eric and Gleitman, Lila R., eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Eve V. 1984 Acquiring Compounds. Pp. 181–190 in Eastern States Conference on Linguistics. Alvarez, Gloria, Brody, Belinda, and McCoy, Terry, eds. Columbus: Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Dressier, Wolfgang 1986 Explanation in Natural Morphology. Illustrated with Comparative and Agent-Noun Formation. Linguistics 24:519–548.Google Scholar
Eliasson, Stig 1976 Abstract Phonology and Contrastive Analysis. Pp. 130–150 in Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress of Applied Linguistics Vol. II. Nickel, Gerhard, ed. Stuttgart: Hochschul Verlag.Google Scholar
Eliasson, Stig 1986 The Inter-Relations Between Theoretical and Applied Linguistics. Pp. 21–49 in The Relation Between Linguistics and Applied Linguistics. Tomic, Olga M. and Shuy, Roger W., eds. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Flynn, Suzanne, and O’Neil, Wayne 1988 Introduction. Pp. 1–24 in Linguistic Theory in Second Language Acquisition. Flynn, Suzanne and O’Neil, Wayne, eds. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Fromkin, Victoria 1971 The Non-Anomalous Nature of Anomalous Utterances. Language. 47:27–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grodzinsky, Yuri 1985 Neurological Constraints on Models of Language Use. Occasional Paper 30. Centre for Cognitive Science, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Hale, Ken 1973 Deep-Surface Canonical Disparities in Relation to Analysis and Change: An Australian Example. Pp. 401–458 in Current Trends in Linguistics Vol. II. Sebeok, Thomas A., ed. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris 1973 Prolegomena to a Theory of Word Formation. Linguistic Inquiry. 4:27–52.Google Scholar
Harman, Gilbert 1980 Two Quibbles About Analytici ty and Psychological Reality. The Behavioural and Brain Sciences. 3:21–22.Google Scholar
Harris, James 1978 Two Theories of Non-Automatic Morphophonological Alternations. Language 54:41–60.Google Scholar
Haugen, Einar 1950 The Analysis of Linguistic Borrowing. Language 26:210–231.Google Scholar
Hooper, Joan B., 1976 An Introduction to Natural Generative Phonology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert, and Lightfoot, David 1981 Explanation in Linguistics. The Logical Problem of Language Acqui sition. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry 1970 The Role of Borrowing in the Justification of Phonological Grammars. Studies in African Linguistics. 1:1–48.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell 1972 Toward Linguistic Competence. Texas Working Papers in Sociolinguistics 16.Google Scholar
Illich, Ivan 1983 Vernacular Values and Education. Pp. 461–496 in The Sociogenesis of Language and Human Conduct. Bain, Bruce, ed. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Iverson, Gregory K. 1978 Synchronie Umlaut in Old Icelandic. Nordic Journal of Linguistics. 1:121–140.Google Scholar
Jackendorff, Ray 1975 Morphological and Semantic Regularities in the Lexicon. Language. 51:639–671.Google Scholar
Janda, Richard 1982 On Limiting the Form of M-Rules: German Umlaut, Diacritic Features, and the ‘Cluster Constraint’. Pp. 140–152 in Proceedings of Northeast Linguistic Society 12. Pustejovsky, James and Sells, Peter, eds. Amherst: University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Joseph, Brian D., and Janda, Richard 1988 The How and Why of Diachronie Morphologization and Demorphologization. Theoretical Morphology. Hammond, M. and Noonan, M., eds. New York: Academic Press. [Forthcoming.]Google Scholar
Joshi, Venkateshshastri 1980 Problems in Sanskrit Grammar. Poona: Dastane Ramchandra.Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael, and Kisseberth, Charles 1977 Topics in Phonological Theory. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul 1968 Linguistic Universale and Linguistic Change. Pp. 171–204 in Universals in Linguistic Theory. Bach, Emmon and Harms, Robert, eds. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul 1982 Lexical Morphology and Phonology. Pp. 3–91 in Linguistics in the Morning Calm. Yange, I. S., ed. Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul 1985 Some Consequences of Lexical Phonology. Phonology Yearbook 2:85–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle 1981 On the Organization of the Lexicon. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Roeper, Thomas 1982 Review of Linguistic Theory and Psychological Reality . Halle, Morris, Bresnan, Joan, and Miller, George A., eds. Language 58:467–472.Google Scholar
Singh, Rajendra 1986 A Plea for External Evidence. Paper for the Sixth International Conference of General and Nordic Linguistics. Helsinki, August, 1986.Google Scholar
Singh, Rajendra 1987 Well-Formedness Conditions and Phonological Theory. Pp. 273–285 in Phonologica 1984. Dressier, Wolfgang et al, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skousen, Royal 1974 Substantive Evidence in Phonology. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Tranel, Bernard 1984 Closed Syllable Adjustment and the Representation of Shwa in French. Pp. 65–75 in Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society. Brugman, Claudia and Macaulay, Monica, eds. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo. 1974 Word and Syllables in Natural Generative Grammar. Pp. 346–374 in Papers From the Parasession on Natural Generative Phonology. Bruck, A. et al, eds. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin 1981 Language Acquisition, Markedness, and Phrase Structure. Pp. 8–34 in Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theory. Tavakolian, Susan L., ed. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar