Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g5fl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T22:09:25.504Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Constraint Violation and Conflict from the Perspective of Declarative Phonology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

James M. Scobbie
James M. Scobbie*
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In phonology, constraints are finally coming into their own. There is no real consensus, however, about how constraints behave, and specifically how they interact with other aspects of the phonology and with each other. Theories of Declarative Phonology (DP) approach this “Interaction Problem” (Scobbie 1991a) in a radical way. In DP everything is a constraint — generalizations and lexical entries alike constrain the form of the intended phonological representation (“surface structure”). Moreover, constraints are mutually compatible, indefeasible and are declared non-procedurally. Declarative Phonology is therefore an extremely simple and restrictive type of constraint-based phonology, eschewing constraint conflict, violation and destructive repair. For details of various declarative theories as well as phonological and computational motivation for the declarative paradigm, see Scobbie (1991a) and the other papers in that volume, Bird et al (1993), Bird (1990), Broe (1993), Coleman (1992), Russell (1992), Scobbie (1991b) and Wheeler (1988).

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 38 , special_issue 2: Special Issue: Constraint-Based Theories in Multilinear Phonology , June 1993 , pp. 155 - 167
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bird, Steven 1990. Constraint-Based Phonology. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Bird, Steven, Coleman, John, Pierrehumbert, Janet, and Scobbie, James M. 1993. Declarative Phonology. Proceedings of the XVth International Congress of Linguists. Crochetière, André, Boulanger, Jean-Claude and Ouellon, Conrad, eds. Quebec: Presses de l’Université Laval. [In press.]Google Scholar
Broe, Michael 1993. Specification Theory: The Treatment of Redundancy in Generative Phonology. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Buckley, Eugene 1992. Theoretical Aspects of Kashaya Phonology and Morphology. PhD thesis, University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar
Coleman, John 1992. The Phonetic Interpretation of Headed Phonological Structures Containing Overlapping Constituents. Phonology. 9:1–44.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, and Halle, Morris 1968. The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Dell, François, and Elmedlaoui, Mohamed 1985. Syllabic Consonants and Syllabification in Imdlawn Tashlhiyt Berber. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics. 7:105–130.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul 1973. “Elsewhere” in Phonology. Pp. 93–107 in A Festschrift for Morris Halle. Anderson, Steven and Kiparsky, Paul, eds. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.Google Scholar
Paradis, Carole 1988. On Constraints and Repair Strategies. The Linguistic Review. 6:71–97.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan, and Smolensky, Paul 1992a. Optimality and Constraint Interaction in Phonology. Paper read at the Berkeley Phonology Seminar, University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan, and Smolensky, Paul 1992b. Optimality: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Paper read at the 12th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Los Angeles: University of California/Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Russell, Kevin 1992. A Constraint-Based Approach to Phonology. Ms.Google Scholar
Scobbie, James M. 1991a. Towards Declarative Phonology. Edinburgh Working Papers in Cognitive Science. 7:1–27.Google Scholar
Scobbie, James M. 1991b. Attribute Value Phonology. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Scobbie, James M. 1992. Against Rule Inversion: The Development of English r-Sandhi. Paper posted at the 7th International Phonology Meeting, Krems.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Deirdre W. 1988. Consequences of Some Categorially Motivated Phonological Assumptions. Pp. 467–488 in Categorial Grammars and Natural Language Structures. Oehrle, Richard T., Bach, Emmon and Wheeler, Deirdre W., eds. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar