Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T07:50:25.210Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Vietnamese and the NP/DP parameter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 December 2016

Trang Phan  and
Eric T. Lander
Trang Phan
Affiliation:
Ghent University/University of Hai Duong
Eric T. Lander
Affiliation:
Ghent University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper investigates the place of Vietnamese in the binary NP/DP typology as formulated by Bošković (2005, 2008, 2009, 2010). Vietnamese patterns with NP languages when it comes to its lack of a genuine definite determiner, the presence of radical pro-drop, and its lack of number morphology, but it patterns with DP languages when it comes to the presence of TP, subject expletives, and subject-object extraction asymmetries. The mixed status of Vietnamese suggests that the difference between article and article-less languages might not be as straightforward or clearcut as Bošković claims. In fact, the way these properties pattern in Vietnamese reveals that there are at least three smaller parameters (nominal, clausal, and quantificational) at stake, not just the presence or absence of DP, and that these three are independently fixed as [-DP], [+TP], and [-movement], respectively. Also important is the fact that Vietnamese is a topic-prominent language.

Résumé

Résumé

Cet article explore le vietnamien dans le cadre de la typologie SN/SD telle que formulée par Bošković (2005, 2008, 2009, 2010). Le vietnamien partage avec les langues SN l’absence d’un véritable déterminant défini, la présence du pro-drop radical et l’absence de la morphologie de nombre mais il partage avec les langues SD la présence du ST, des explétifs sujets et des asymétries sujet-objet. Ce statut hybride du vietnamien nous porte à proposer que la différence entre les langues SN et les langues SD n’est pas aussi catégorique que déclare Bošković. En fait, ces propriétés hybrides du vietnamien suggèrent qu’il est question d’au moins trois paramètres (nominal, phrastique et quantificationnel) au lieu de la simple présence du SD et que ces paramètres en vietnamien ont les valeurs [-SD], [+ST] et [-déplacement], respectivement. Il est également important que le vietnamien est une langue dans laquelle le topique est proéminent.

Keywords

NP-DP parameterVietnamesetopic-prominiencequantificational-in-situparamètre SN-SDvietnamienproéminence des topiquesquantification-in-situ
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 60 , Issue 3 , November 2015 , pp. 391 - 415
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association/Association canadienne de linguistique 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abels, Klaus. 2003. Successive cyclicity, anti-locality, and adposition stranding. Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Bošković, Željko. 2005. On the locality of left branch extraction and the structure of NP. Studia Linguistica 59:1–45.Google Scholar
Bošković, Željko. 2008. What will you have, DP or NP? In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, ed. Elfner, Emily and Walkow, Martin, 101–114. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Bošković, Željko. 2009. More on the no-DP analysis of article-less languages. Studia Linguistica 2:187–204.Google Scholar
Bošković, Željko. 2010. OnNPs and clauses. Ms., University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Bui, Manh Hung. 2000. Vê mót só đăc trang ngù nghìa—ngū pháp cůa nhüng và các [Some semantico-syntactic characteristics of nhüng and các]. Ngôn ngü 3:16–26.Google Scholar
Cao, Xuan Hao, 2004. Tiêng Viêt Sa Thào Ngù Pháp Chú Năng [A functional grammar of Vietnamese]. Ha Noi: Giáo duc.Google Scholar
Carrilho, Ernestina. 2007. Beyond subject doubling: Expletive constructions in European Portuguese dialects. Proceedings of the Workshop on Syntactic Doubling. Meertens Institute, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences. http://www.meertens.knaw.nl/projecten/edisyn/Online_proceedings/Paper_Carrilho.pdf Google Scholar
Cheng, Hsu-Te. 2013. Argument ellipsis, classifier phrases, and the DP parameter. Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Cheng, Lisa. 1991. On the typology of wh-questions. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Cheng, Lisa and Sybesma, Rint. 1999. Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry 30:509–542.Google Scholar
Cheng, Lisa and ybesma, Rint. 2005. Classifiers in four varieties of Chinese. In The Oxford handbook of comparative syntax, ed. Cinque, Guglielmo and Kayne, Richard, 259–292. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries. In Step by step: Essays on Minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, ed. Martin, Roger, Michaels, David, and Uriagereka, Juan, 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cresti, Diana. 1995. Indefinite topics. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Dao, Huy Linh. 2012. Intransitività scindée, passif et sujet impersonnel en vietnamien. In Actes du 31e Colloque International sur le Lexique et la Grammaire, éd. Radimský, Jan, 49–55. Nové Hrady: Université de Bohême du Sud à České Budějovice.Google Scholar
Duffield, Nigel. 2007. Aspects of Vietnamese clause structure: Separating tense from assertion. Linguistics 45:765–814.Google Scholar
Duffield, Nigel. 2013. Head-first: On the head-initiality of Vietnamese clauses. In Linguistics of Vietnamese: An international survey, ed. Hole, Daniel and Löbel, Elisabeth, 127–155. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Duffield, Nigel. 2015a. On what projects: Anti-projection and multifunctionality in Vietnamese. Ms., Konan University.Google Scholar
Duffield, Nigel. 2015b. Particles and projections in Vietnamese syntax. Ms., Konan University.Google Scholar
É. Kiss, Katalin. 1994. Discourse configurational languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Emeneau, Murray B. 1951. Studies in Vietnamese grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Enç, Mürvet. 1991. The semantics of specificity. Linguistic Inquiry 22:1–25.Google Scholar
Farkas, Donka F. 2002. Specificity distinctions. Journal of Semantics 19:213–243.Google Scholar
Gallego, Angel J. and Uriagereka, Juan. 2007. Sub-extraction from subjects: A phase theory account. In Romance linguistics 2006., ed. Camacho, José, Flores-Ferrán, Nydia, Sánchez, Liliana, Déprez, Viviane, and Cabrera, María José, 149–162. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Greco, Ciro, Phan, Trang, and Haegeman, Liliane. 2015. There is no expletive in Vietnamese after all. Ms., Ghent University.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus. 2001. Chapter 62: Articles. In Language typology: An international handbook, vol. 1, 831–841. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. 2010. Null subject parameters. In Parametric variation: Null subjects in Minimalist theory, ed. Biberauer, Theresa, Holmberg, Anders, Roberts, Ian, and Sheehan, Michelle, 88–124. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders and Nikanne, Urpo. 2002. Expletives, subjects, and topics in Finnish. In Subjects, expletives, and the EPP, ed. Svenonius, Peter, 71–105. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kirby, James P. 2006. Vietnamese and the structure of NP. Ms., Edinburgh University.Google Scholar
Lander, Eric T. and Haegeman, Liliane. 2014. Old Norse as an NP language: With observations on the Common Norse and Northwest Germanic runic inscriptions. Transactions of the Philological Society 112:279–318.Google Scholar
Li, Jiang. 2012. Nominal arguments and language variation. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2010. Why agree? Why move? Unifying agreement-based and discourse-configurational languages. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Nguyen, Chieu. 2013. Fusion and scattering in particle collisions: When universal quantification and contrastive focus interact with themselves and each other in Vietnamese. In Proceedings of GLOW in Asia IX 2012., ed. Goto, Nobu, Otaki, Koichi, Sato, Atsushi, and Takita, Kensuke, 213–228. Mie University, Japan.Google Scholar
Nguyen, Hanh. 2012. Wh-questions in Vietnamese. Master’s thesis, University of Nantes.Google Scholar
Nguyen, Hung Tuong. 2004. The structure of the Vietnamese noun phrase. Doctoral dissertation, Boston University.Google Scholar
Nguyen, Van Hiep and Thuy, Nguyen Hoang. 2011. Ve chů ngO già trong tiéng Viêt [Dummy subjects in Vietnamese]. Paper presented at the 11th International Conference on Linguistics Training and Research in Vietnam, Ha Noi.Google Scholar
Paul, Waltraud and Whitman, John. To appear. Topic prominence. In The Blackwell companion to syntax, 2nd ed., ed. Everaert, Martin and van Riemsdijk, Henk. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Phan, Trang. 2013. Syntax of Vietnamese aspect. Doctoral dissertation, University of Sheffield.Google Scholar
Phan, Trang. 2014. Definiteness in Vietnamese in comparison to Chinese. Paper presented at CamCos 3, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Phan, Trang and Lander, Eric T.. 2015. Plurality in classifier languages: A Vietnamese perspective. Ms., Ghent University.Google Scholar
Portoer, Paul. 2002. Topicality and (non-)specificity in Mandarin. Journal of Semantics 19:275–287.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian and Holmberg, Anders. 2010. Introduction. In Parametric variation: Null subjects in Minimalist theory, ed. Biberauer, Theresa, Holmberg, Anders, Roberts, Ian, and Sheehan, Michelle, 1–57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Starke, Michal. 2001. Move dissolves into merge: A theory of locality. Doctoral dissertation, University of Geneva.Google Scholar
Thompson, Laurence C. 1965. A Vietnamese grammar. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Tran, Thuan. 2009. Wh-quantification in Vietnamese. Doctoral dissertation, University of Delaware.Google Scholar
Trinh, Tue. 2004. Mót eách nhin tiêng Viêt quái go? [An “awkward” approach to Vietnamese?]. Talawas. http:/7tusach.thuvienkhoahoc.com/wiki. Google Scholar
Trinh, Tue. 2005. Aspects of clause structure in Vietnamese. Master’s thesis, Humboldt University.Google Scholar
Tsai, Cheng-Yu Edwin. 2009. Wh-dependency in Vietnamese and the syntax of wh-in-situ. Master’s thesis, National Tsing Hua University.Google Scholar