Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-20T04:02:36.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mutation and Case in Welsh

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Robert D. Borsley
Robert D. Borsley*
Affiliation:
University of Wales, Bangor
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The most common mutation system of Welsh, soft mutation, affects among other elements the object of a finite verb. This is often known as direct object mutation (DOM). Objects have accusative Case in many languages. Hence, it is natural to consider the possibility that DOM is a manifestation of accusative Case, and this has been proposed by a number of people. There is evidence, however, that this idea is both too strong and too weak. It predicts soft mutation where it does not in fact occur, and there are a number of instances of soft mutation which appear to form a natural class with DOM but cannot plausibly be analyzed as a manifestation of accusative Case. A widely discussed alternative to a Case-based view of DOM is one in which DOM is triggered by a preceding phrase of some kind. This approach looks quite promising. However, it does not fit readily into the Principles and Parameters framework. It seems, then, that DOM poses a major challenge for this framework.

Résumé

Résumé

Le système de mutation le plus répandu du gallois affecte, entre autres éléments, l’objet de verbes à temps fini et est ainsi souvent appelé la mutation de l’objet direct (MOD). Puisque les objects directs portent normalement le Cas accusatif, il semble naturel de considérer que MOD est une manifestation du Cas accusatif, comme l’ont proposé plusieurs auteurs. Il existe cependant des indications que cette hypothèse est à la fois trop forte et trop faible. En effet, cette hypothèse prédit que la mutation devrait se produire dans certains contextes où elle n’a pas lieu. Par ailleurs, il existe un certain nombre de cas de mutation qui paraissent former une classe naturelle avec MOD mais qui ne peuvent pas être analysés comme des manifestations du Cas accusatif. Une hypothèse concurrente largement discutée propose que MOD est déclenchée par la présence d’un syntagme précédent d’un certain type. Quoique cette approche semble prometteuse, elle n’est pas conforme à la théorie des principes et paramètres. Il semble donc que MOD constitue un défi important pour cette approche.

Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 42 , Special Issue 1-2: Topics in Celtic Syntax , June 1997 , pp. 31 - 56
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Awbery, Gwenllian M. 1976. The syntax of Welsh: A transformational study of the passive. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Awbery, Gwenllian M. 1990. Dialect syntax: A neglected resource for Welsh. In Syntax and semantics 23: The syntax of the Modern Celtic languages, ed. Hendrick, Randall, 1–25. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ball, Martin J., and Miiller, Nicole. 1992. Mutation in Welsh. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Borsley, Robert D. 1993. On so-called verb-nouns in Welsh. Journal of Celtic linguistics 2:35–64.Google Scholar
Borsley, Robert D. 1996. Mutation and constituent structure in Welsh. Ms., University of Wales, Bangor.Google Scholar
Borsley, Robert D. 1997. On a nominal analysis of Welsh verb-nouns. In Dan Do Oide: Essays in memory of Conn R. Ó Cleirigh, ed. Ahlquist, Anders and Capkova, Vera, 39–47. Dublin: Institiúid Teangeolaíochta Éireann.Google Scholar
Borsley, Robert D., and Tallerman, Maggie O.. 1996. Phrases and soft mutation in Welsh. Journal of Celtic Linguistics 5:1–49.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin and use. London: Praeger.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1993. A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In The view from building 20, ed. Hale, Kenneth and Keyser, Samuel Jay, 1–52. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1977. In defense of spontaneous demotion. In Syntax and semantics 8: Grammatical relations, ed. Cole, Peter and Sadock, Jerrold, 25–55. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Fife, James. 1990. The semantics of the Welsh verb: A cognitive approach. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
Harlow, Stephen. 1981. Government and relativization in Celtic. In Binding and filtering, ed. Heny, Frank, 213–254. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Harlow, Stephen. 1989. Syntax of Welsh soft mutation. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 7:289–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendrick, Randall. 1988. Anaphora in Celtic and universal grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard S. 1984. Connectedness and binary branching. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Gareth. 1993. Modern Welsh: A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Larson, Richard. 1988. On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry 19:445–91.Google Scholar
Lasnik, Howard. 1992. Case and expletives. Linguistic Inquiry 23:381–405.Google Scholar
Lasnik, Howard. 1995. Case and expletives revisited: On greed and other human failings. Linguistic Inquiry 26:615–644.Google Scholar
Manzini, M. Rita. 1992. Locality: A theory and some of its empirical consequences. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Manzini, M. Rita, and Roussou, Anna. 1997. A minimalist theory of A-movement and control. Ms., University College London and University of Wales, Bangor.Google Scholar
McCloskey, James, and Hale, Kenneth. 1984. On the syntax of person-number inflection in Modern Irish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1:487–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollard, Carl, and Sag, Ivan. 1994. Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian. 1995. Movement and mutation in Welsh. Paper read at the Celtic Linguistics Conference, University College Dublin.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian. 1996. The syntax of direct object mutation in Welsh. Ms., University of Wales, Bangor.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian, and Shlonsky, Ur. 1996. Pronominal enclisis in VSO languages. In The syntax of the Celtic languages: A comparative perspective, ed. Borsley, Robert D. and Roberts, Ian, 171–199. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouveret, Alain. 1994. Syntaxe du gallois: principes généraux et typologie. Paris: CNRS Editions.Google Scholar
Sadler, Louisa. 1988. Welsh syntax: A government-binding approach. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Sobin, Nicholas J. 1985. Case assignment in Ukrainian morphological passive constructions. Linguistic Inquiry 16:649–62.Google Scholar
Tallerman, Maggie O. 1987. Mutation and the syntactic structure of modern colloquial Welsh. Doctoral dissertation, University of Hull.Google Scholar
Tallerman, Maggie O. 1990. VSO word order and consonantal mutaton in Welsh. Linguistics 28:389–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Edwin. 1994. Thematic structure in syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Stephen J. 1980. A Welsh grammar. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
Willis, Penny. 1988. Is the Welsh verbal noun a verb or a noun?. Word 39:201–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold. 1984. Welsh soft mutation and the case of object NPs. In Papers from the Twentieth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, ed. Drogo, Joseph, Mishra, Veena, and Testen, David, 387–402. Chicago Linguistic Society, University of Chicago.Google Scholar