Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T03:20:18.454Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Law of Bad Smells: Making and Adjudicating Offensiveness Claims in Contemporary Local Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 October 2019

Mariana Valverde
Mariana Valverde*
Affiliation:
Centre Criminology and Sociolegal Studies University of Torontom.valverde@utoronto.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The sense of smell seems to have resisted the kind of objective measurement process that might have facilitated settling competing claims about offensive smells by applying a general rule or standard. As a result, authorities, including courts,cannot avoid making subjective judgements of taste. A nuisance lawsuit out of Ontario regarding a mushroom farm, or rather its smells, is used here as one source of material about the difficulties of adjudication in this subfield of the “law of the senses.” Attention is also paid to a curious quasi-judicial entity, Ontario’s Normal Farm Practices Protection Board, charged with resolving, mainly through mediation, disputes about farm smells between farmers and non-farming neighbours. Overall, the article shows that the ex post facto, situated and complaint-driven logic of nuisance that nineteenth-century law used to govern offensive noises as well as nasty smells, and which left plenty of room for subjective judgements of taste, keeps reappearing in the present day. Nasty smells seem particularly impervious to modernization, that is to being managed through objective measurement and preventive regulation.

Résumé

L’odorat semble avoir résisté au processus de création de mesures objectives où l’on applique une règle ou une norme générale. Ce processus aurait pu faciliter la règlementation relative aux réclamations concurrentes sur les odeurs offensantes. Par conséquent, les autorités, y compris les tribunaux, ne peuvent éviter de porter des jugements subjectifs. Une poursuite pour nuisance, qui se déroule en banlieue de l’Ontario, et se rapportant à une champignonnière, ou plus précisément ses odeurs, est d’ailleurs utilisée dans cet article afin d’illustrer les difficultés dans la prise de décision judiciaire relativement au droit des sens. Une attention particulière est également portée à la Commission de protection des pratiques agricoles normales de l’Ontario, une curieuse entité judiciaire qui est chargée de régler, principalement par la médiation, les différends concernant les odeurs agricoles entre les agriculteurs et leurs voisins non-agriculteurs. Dans l’ensemble, le présent article montre que la logique de nuisance a posteriori, située et fondée sur les plaintes, qui était utilisée dans le droit du XIXe siècle afin de régir les bruits offensants et les mauvaises odeurs, et qui laissait une large place aux jugements subjectifs, ne cesse de réapparaître dans le monde actuel. Les odeurs désagréables semblent, en ce sens, particulièrement insensibles à la modernisation, c’est-à-dire à la gestion par des mesures objectives et à une réglementation préventive.

Keywords

offensivenessnuisancesmellsodoursfarming practicesoffensiviténuisanceodeurspratiques agricoles
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Law and Society / La Revue Canadienne Droit et Société , Volume 34 , Special Issue 2: Vers une déstabilisation du sensorium du droit: Étude de la jurisprudence des sens / Troubling Law’s Sensorium: Explorations in Sensational Jurisprudence , August 2019 , pp. 327 - 341
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Law and Society Association / Association Canadienne Droit et Société 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Thanks to Grace Tran for excellent research assistance.

References

References

Benidickson, Jamie. The culture of flushing: a social and legal history of sewage. Vancouver: UBC Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Buhler, Sarah. Law’s sense of smell: Odours and evictions at the Landlord and Tenant Board. In Sensing Law , ed. Hamilton, Sheryl, Majury, Diana, Moore, Dawn, Sargent, Neil, and Wilke, Christiane, 189–94. New York: Routledge, 2017.Google Scholar
Classen, Constance, Howes, David, and Synnott, Andrew. Aroma: The cultural history of smell . New York: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar
Cooper, Davina. Far Beyond “The Early Morning Crowing of a Farmyard Cock”: Revisiting the place of nuisance within legal and political discourse. Social & Legal Studies 14, no. 1 (2002): 5–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Peter. Cities of Tomorrow: An intellectual history of urban planning and design since 1880 . Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 2014.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Sheryl, Majury, Diana, Moore, Dawn, Sargent, Neil, and Wilke, Christiane, eds., Sensing Law . New York: Routledge, 2017.Google Scholar
Howes, David, ed. Empire of the Senses: The sensual culture reader. London: Bloomsbury, 2005.Google Scholar
Howes, David, and Classen, Constance. Ways of Sensing: Understanding the senses in society . New York: Routledge, 2014.Google Scholar
Hunt, Alan. Governing Morals: A social history of moral regulation . New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Joyce, Patrick. The Rule of Freedom: Liberalism and the modern city . London: Verso, 2003.Google Scholar
Levi, Ron, and Valverde, Mariana. Knowledge on tap: police science and everyday knowledge in the legal regulation of drunkenness. Law and Social Inquiry 26, no. 4 (2001): 819–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindsay, Ian. 2012. Can Vancouver’s Anti-Stink Bylaws Pass the Smell Test? National Post (August 16). https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/can-vancouvers-anti-stink-bylaw-pass-the-smell-testGoogle Scholar
Novak, William. The People’s Welfare: Law and regulation in nineteenth-century America . Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Peterson, Jon. The Birth of City Planning in the United States, 1840–1917 . Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Reiter, Eric H. Nuisance and Neighbourhood in Late Nineteenth-Century Montreal: Drysdale v Dugas in its Contexts. In Property on Trial: Canadian Cases in Context, ed. Tucker, Eric, Muir, James, and Ziff, Bruce, 35–69. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Scott, Dayna. The smell of neglect. In Sensing Law , ed. Hamilton, Sheryl, Majury, Diana, Moore, Dawn, Sargent, Neil, and Wilke, Christiane, 162–78. New York: Routledge, 2017.Google Scholar
Scott, James. Seeing Like a State: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed . New Haven: Yale University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Valverde, Mariana. Authorizing the Production of Urban Moral Order: Appellate courts and their knowledge games. Law and Society Review 39, no. 2 (2005): 419–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valverde, Mariana. Seeing Like a City: The dialectic of modern and premodern knowledges in urban governance. Law and Society Review 45, no. 2 (2011): 277–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valverde, Mariana. Everyday Law on the Street: City governance in an age of diversity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cases cited

Montréal (City) v. 2952-1366 Québec Inc , 2005 SCC 62Google Scholar
Ottawa (City) v. Freidman, OCJ 1998, Par 3 (Carswell Ont 5974)Google Scholar
Pike v Tri Gro Enterprises, 1999 O.J. No. 3217, Ontario Court of Appeal 2001.Google Scholar
Village of Euclid v Rambler Realty, 272 US 365 (1926).Google Scholar

Legislation cited

City of Toronto By-law 1049-2006Google Scholar
“Right to Farm” Law, Connecticut General Statutes, Title 19a, Chap. 368m, Sec. 19a-341Google Scholar