Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 July 2014
The careers of male lawyers are radically altered by their experiences in the formation of families. These understudied male experiences fuel income differences, creating a highly hierarchical profession focused around a male mystique of “living large.” This study traces these processes across a 20-year longitudinal study of Toronto lawyers. We argue that time with corporate clients is a very specialized investment that is rewarded with partnership and earnings and that, among men, bears an unexpectedly unique relationship to having children, and that this specialized investment and its relationship to family are more culturally driven than biologically derived.
Les carrières des hommes avocats sont radicalement altérées par les évènements au moment de fonder une famille. Insuffisamment étudiées, ces expériences masculines contribuent à des inégalités salariales, créant une profession éminemment hiérarchique centrée sur une mystique masculine de la « vie d'abondance ». Cet article examine ces processus à l'aide d'une étude longitudinale des expériences des avocats de Toronto, effectuée sur une période de vingt ans. Selon nous, le temps consacré aux clients corporatifs constitue un investissement spécialisé qui est récompensé par l'obtention d'un partenariat ainsi que par des gains monétaires. Parmi les hommes, cet investissement est lié inopinément avec le fait d'avoir ou non des enfants. Nous démontrons comment cet investissement spécialisé ainsi que sa relation à la famille sont dictés davantage par des facteurs culturels que par des facteurs biologiques.
1 Leonhardt, David, “Scant progress on closing gap in women's pay: For college graduates the disparity widens,” New York Times, 24 December 2006.Google Scholar
4 American Bar Association Commission on Women in the Legal Profession. A Current Glance at Women in Law 2009 (Chicago: American Bar Association, 2009), http://wwwabanet.org/women/CurrentGlanceStatistics2009.pdf, 4Google Scholar; see generally American Bar Association Commission on Women in the Legal Profession. Goal 9 Report Card (Chicago: American Bar Association, 2009), http://www.abanet.org/women/goalix/2009goal_iii_women.pdf, 5Google Scholar.
5 Gorman, Elizabeth, “Moving Away from ‘Up or Out’: Determinants of Permanent Employment in Law Firms,” Law and Society Review 33 (1999), 637CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gorman, Elizabeth H. and Kmec, Julie A., “Hierarchical Rank and Women's Organizational Mobility: Glass Ceilings in Corporate Law Firms,” American Journal of Sociology 114 (2009), 1428CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Noonan, Marc C., Corcoran, Mary E., and Courant, Paul N., “Pay Differences among the Highly Trained: Cohort Differences in the Sex Gap in Lawyers' Earnings,” Social Forces 84 (2005), 853CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
6 Gorman and Kmec, “Hierarchical Rank and Women's Organizational Mobility”; Noonan, Mary C., Corcoran, Mary E., and Courant, Paul N., “Is the Partnership Gap Closing for Women? Cohort Differences in the Sex Gap in Partnership Chances,” Social Science Research 37 (2008), 156CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Noonan, Mary C. and Corcoran, Mary E., “The Mommy Track and Partnership: Temporary Delay or Dead End?” ANNALS, AAPSS (2004), 596Google Scholar; Wass, Victoria and McNabb, Robert, “Pay, Promotion and Parenthood among Women Solicitors” Work, Employment and Society 20 (2006), 289CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
7 American Bar Association Commission on Women in the Legal Profession. Charting our Progress: The Status of Women in the Profession Today (Chicago: American Bar Association, 2006), http://www.abanet.org/women/ChartingourProgress.pdf, 10Google Scholar. Women lawyers make up 30.2% of the profession and hold 17.3% of firm partnerships. See National Association for Law Placement, “Women and Attorneys of Color at Law Firms—2005,” NALP Bulletin, November, http://www.nalp.org/2006febwomenandattorneysofcolor?s=women and attorneys of color at law firms.
8 Kingsmill, Suzanne, The Family Squeeze: Surviving the Sandwich Generation (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Mitchell, Barbara, The Boomerang Age: Transitions to Adulthood in Families (New York: Aldine-Transaction, 2006)Google Scholar; Neal, Margaret and Hammer, Leslie, Working Couples Caring for Children and Aging Parents: Effects of Work and Well-Being (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2007)Google Scholar; Roots, C.R., The Sandwich Generation: Adult Children Caring for Aging Parents (New York: Garland Publishing, 1998)Google Scholar.
9 Hagan, John and Kay, Fiona, Gender in Practice: A Study of Lawyers' Lives (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995)Google Scholar; Rhode, Deborah, The Unfinished Agenda: Women and the Legal Profession (Chicago: ABA Commission of Women in the Profession, 2001)Google Scholar; Rubin, S., “At the Top of their Game,” Financial Post, 10 September 2003Google Scholar.
10 Brockman, Joan, “Leaving the Practice of Law: The Wherefores and the Whys,” Alberta Law Review 32 (1994), 116Google Scholar; Reichman, Nancy and Sterling, Joyce, “Recasting the Brass Ring: Deconstructing and Reconstructing Workplace Opportunities for Women Lawyers,” Capital University Law Review 29 (2002), 923Google Scholar.
12 Donnell, Cathlin, Sterling, Joyce, and Reichman, Nancy, Gender Penalties: The Results of the Careers and Compensation Study (Wheat Ridge, CO: Colorado Women's Bar Association, 1998)Google Scholar; Epstein, Cynthia et al. , “Glass Ceilings and Open Doors: Women's Advancement in the Legal Profession,” Fordham Law Review 64 (1995), 291Google Scholar; Hagan and Kay, Gender in Practice; Radford, Mary, “Sex Stereotyping and the Promotion of Women to Positions of Power,” Hastings Law Journal 41 (1990), 471Google Scholar.
13 Hagan, John, “The Gender Stratification of Income Inequality among Lawyers,” Social Forces 68 (1990), 835CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Rhode, The Unfinished Agenda; Stager, David and Foot, David, “Changes in Lawyers' Earnings: The Impact of Differentiation and Growth in the Canadian Legal Profession,” Law and Social Inquiry 13 (1988), 71CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
16 Menkel-Meadow, Carrie, “Exploring a Research Agenda of the Feminization of the Legal Profession: Theories of Gender and Social Change,” Law and Social Inquiry 14 (1989), 289CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Barnett, Martha, “Women Practicing Law: Changes in Attitudes, Changes in Platitutdes,” Florida Law Review 42 (1990), 209Google Scholar; Glendon, Mary Ann, A Nation Under Lawyers: How the Crisis in the Legal Profession Is Transforming American Society (New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 1994)Google Scholar; Rhode, Deborah, In the Interests of Justice: Reforming the Legal Profession (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000)Google Scholar; Schiltz, Patrick, “On Being a Happy, Healthy and Ethical Member of an Unhappy, Unhealthy, and Unethical Profession,” Vanderbilt Law Review 52 (1999), 871Google Scholar.
17 Schultz, Ulrike and Shaw, Gisela, eds., Women in the World's Legal Professions (Oxford: Hart, 2003)Google Scholar; Sommerlad, Hilary and Sanderson, Peter, Gender, Choice, and Commitment: Women Solicitors in England and Wales and the Struggle for Equal Status (Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, 1998)Google Scholar.
18 See Sommerlad, Hilary, “The Myth of Feminisation: Women and Cultural Change in the Legal Profession,” International Journal of the Legal Profession 1, 1 (1994), 36CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kuo, Shu-Chin Grace, “Rethinking the Masculine Character of the Legal Profession: A Case Study of Female Legal Professionals and Their Gendered Life in Taiwan,” Journal of Gender, Social Policy, and the Law 13, 1 (2005), 28Google Scholar; Porter, Nicole B., “Re-defining Superwoman: An Essay on Overcoming the ‘Maternal Wall’ in the Legal Workplace,” Duke Journal of Gender, Law and Policy 55 (2006), 55Google Scholar; Pierce, Jennifer, Gender Trials: Emotional Lives in Contemporary Law Firms (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
19 Fryburger, Bruce, “Maternity Leave Policies under Title VII,” Labor Law Journal 26 (1975), 163Google Scholar.
21 O'Connell, Martin, “Maternity Leave Arrangements: 1961–1985” (report), Work and Family Patterns of American Women, Current Population Reports Special Studies Series 165 (Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce, Bureau of Census, 1985), http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED320706.pdf, 23Google Scholar.
22 Heinz, John P., Nelson, Robert L., Sandefur, Rebecca L., and Laumann, Edward O., Urban Lawyers: The New Social Structure of the Bar (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005)Google Scholar.
23 Kelley and Dobbin, “Civil Rights Law at Work.”
25 Dowd, Nancy E., “Resisting Essentialism and Hierarchy: A Critique of Work/Family Strategies for Women Lawyers,” Harvard Blackletter Law Journal 16 (2000), 185Google Scholar; López, Maria Pabón, “The Future of Women in the Legal Profession: Recognizing the Challenges Ahead by Reviewing Current Trends,” Hastings Women's Law Journal 19, 1 (2008), 53Google Scholar; Williams, Joan, “Canaries in the Mine: Work/Family Conflict and the Law,” Fordham Law Review 70 (2002), 2221Google Scholar.
26 See, e.g., Allen, Tammy et al. , “Career Benefits Associated with Mentoring for Protégés: A Meta-analysis,” Journal of Applied Psychology 89, 1 (2004), 127CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ehrich, Lisa, Hansford, Brian, and Tennent, Lee, “Formal Mentoring Programs in Education and Other Professions: A Review of the Literature,” Educational Administration Quarterly 40 (2004), 518CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Underhill, Christina, “The Effectiveness of Mentoring Programs in Corporate Settings: A Meta-analytical Review of the Literature,” Journal of Vocational Behavior 68 (2006), 292CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
27 Though see Kay, Fiona M. and Wallace, Jean E., “Is More Truly Merrier? Mentors and the Practice of Law,” Canadian Review of Sociology 47, 1 (2010), 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kay, Fiona M. and Wallace, Jean E., “Mentors as Social Capital: Gender and Career Rewards in Law Practice,” Sociological Inquiry 79 (2009), 418CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Laband, David N. and Lentz, Bernard F., “Workplace Mentoring in the Legal Profession,” Southern Economic Journal 61 (1995), 783CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
29 Arnowitz, Tod, “Mentoring Is for You,” American Bar Journal 77, 5 (2003), 4Google Scholar; Bargman, David, “Benefits of Law Firm Mentoring,” New York Law Journal 222, 58 (1999), 5Google Scholar; Black, Mary, “Mentoring Legal Professionals,” Utah Bar Journal 18, 1 (2005), 45Google Scholar; Bremer, Celeste, “Reducing Judicial Stress through Mentoring,” Judicature 87, 5 (2004), 244Google Scholar; Chae, Alex, “Won't You Be My Mentor? Commitment to Diversity Goes Beyond Recruitment,” New Jersey Law Journal 26 (2002), 758Google Scholar; Cutter, Gail, “Back to the Future: Mentoring Still Key,” New York Law Journal 223, 68 (2000), 1Google Scholar.
31 See Laband and Lentz, “Workplace Mentoring,” 783.
34 Rosenfeld, Sarah, “Gender and Mental Health: Do Women Have More Psychopathology, Men More, or Both the Same (and Why)?” in A Handbook for the Study of Mental Health: Social Contexts, Theories and Systems, ed. Horowitz, Allan and Scheid, Teresa (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999), 220Google Scholar.
35 For a general discussion of the need to demonstrate masculinity in the workplace and as family providers see Connell, Robert W., Masculinities (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1995)Google Scholar; Lusher, Dean and Robins, Garry, “Hegemonic and Other Masculinities in Local Social Contexts,” Men and Masculinities 11 (2009), 387CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
37 Blair-Loy, Mary, Competing Devotions: Career and Family among Women Executives (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003)Google Scholar; Hays, Sharon, The Cultural Contradictions of Motherhood (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1996)Google Scholar; Stone, Pamela, Opting Out? Why Women Really Quit Careers and Head Home (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2007)Google Scholar.
38 However, a recent study explores how male lawyers report more time spent on work and leisure, whereas female lawyers devote more time to housework and child care. See Wallace, Jean E. and Young, Marisa C., “Work Hard, Play Hard? A Comparison of Male and Female Lawyers' Time in Paid and Unpaid Work and Participation in Leisure Activities,” Canadian Review of Sociology 47, 1 (2010), 27CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
39 Hagan and Kay, Gender in Practice.
40 Dinovitzer, Ronit et al. , After the JD: First Results of a National Study of Legal Careers (Chicago: American Bar Foundation / NALP Foundation for Law Career Research, 2004)Google Scholar.
44 For example, Berk, , The Gender Factory, 209Google Scholar, argues that “market demands can directly affect total household labor time, and that the introduction of children into the household can significantly increase household labor tasks and time” for women.
45 Recent research documents the impact of child care on lawyers' earnings. See Dau-Schmidt, Kenneth G., Galanter, Marc, Mukhopadhaya, Kaushik, and Hull, Kathleen E., “Men and Women of the Bar: The Impact of Gender on Legal Careers,” Michigan Journal of Gender and Law 16 (2009), 49Google Scholar.
47 Women lawyers' husbands' incomes were typically higher than those of male lawyers' wives, averaging $92,500 compared with $52,500 among male lawyers' wives. Only a small fraction (4%) of women lawyers' husbands earned less than $10,000 per year, whereas 17% of male lawyers' wives fell into this low-income bracket. In addition, while 14% of women lawyers' husbands earned less than $45,000 per year, a full 54% of male lawyers' wives earned less than $45,000 per year. We also inquired about the occupations of lawyers' spouses. Interestingly, few male lawyers described their wife's occupation as “homemaker,” although 40% of married male lawyers did not report an occupation for their spouse. In contrast, only 7% of married female lawyers did not report an occupation for their spouse. Women lawyers more often married other lawyers (36%) than any other professional group (about 13% of married male lawyers reported that their wives are also lawyers).
50 See, e.g., Rhode, Deborah L., “Balanced Lives for Lawyers,” Fordham Law Review 70 (2002), 2207Google Scholar.