Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T12:58:14.078Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Trends in use in a Canadian pediatric emergency department

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2015

Quynh Doan ,
Emerson D. Genuis  and
Alvis Yu
Quynh Doan*
Affiliation:
Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics Department of Emergency Medicine
Emerson D. Genuis
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine
Alvis Yu
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
*
B429_4480 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC V6H 3N1; qdoan12@gmail.com

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction:

Emergency department (ED) crowding is a significant problem in Canada and has been associated with decreased quality of care in general and pediatric emergency departments (PEDs). Although boarding of admitted patients in the ED is the main contributor to adult ED overcrowding, factors involved in PED crowding may be different. The objective of this study was to report the trend in PED services use and to document the degree of overcrowding experienced in a Canadian PED.

Methods:

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using administrative data from a tertiary care PED from 2002 to 2011. The primary outcome was PED use (total volume of visits and case severity per triage levels using the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale [CTAS] score and admissions). Secondary outcomes included measures of PED overcrowding, such as rates of patients leaving without being seen (LWBS) and length of stay (LOS).

Results:

Total volumes increased by 30% over the 10-year study period, whereas hospitalizations remained stable at approximately 10%. Trends in CTAS levels did not indicate meaningful changes in the severity of cases treated at our PED. LWBS proportions among CTAS 3, CTAS 4, and CTAS 5 groups and LOS for all CTAS groups progressively and statistically increased from year to year.

Conclusions:

Over the course of the study period, there was a substantial increase in PED visits,which likely contributed to the worsening markers of PED flow outcomes. Further study into the effects of PED crowding on patient outcomes is warranted.

Keywords

cardiopulmonary resuscitationlaryngeal mask airwaypositive pressure ventilation
Type
Original Research • Recherche Originale
Information
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine , Volume 16 , Issue 5 , September 2014 , pp. 405 - 410
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2014

References

REFERENCES

1. Guttmann, A, Schull, MJ, Vermeulen, MJ, Stukel, TA. Association between waiting times and short term mortality and hospital admission after departure from emergency department: population based cohort study from Ontario, Canada. BMJ 2011;342:d2983, doi:10.1136/bmj.d2983.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Richardson, DB. Increase in patient mortality at 10 days associated with emergency department overcrowding. Med J Aust 2006;184:213–6.Google Scholar
3. Rondeau, K V, Francescutti, LH. Emergency department overcrowding: the impact of resource scarcity on physician job satisfaction. J Healthc Manag 2005;50:327–40.Google Scholar
4. Schull, MJ, Lazier, K, Vermeulen, M, et al. Emergency department contributors to ambulance diversion: a quantitative analysis. Ann Emerg Med 2003;41:467–76, doi:10.1067/mem.2003.23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Ospina, MB, Bond, K, Schull, M, et al. Key indicators of overcrowding in Canadian emergency departments: a Delphi study. CJEM 2007;9:339–46.Google Scholar
6. Bourgeois, FT, Shannon, MW. Emergency care for children in pediatric and general emergency departments. Pediatr Emerg Care 2007;23:94–102, doi:10.1097/PEC.0b013e3180302c22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Sills, MR, Fairclough, DL, Ranade, D, et al. Emergency department crowding is associated with decreased quality of analgesia delivery for children with pain related to acute, isolated, long-bone fractures. Acad Emerg Med 2011;181:1330–8, doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01136.x.Google Scholar
8. Timm, NL, Ho, ML, Luria, JW. Pediatric emergency department overcrowding and impact on patient flow outcomes. Acad Emerg Med 2008;15:832–7, doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00224.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Stang, AS, McGillivray, D, Bhatt, M, et al. Markers of overcrowding in a pediatric emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 2010;17:151–6, doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00631.x.Google Scholar
10. Weiss, SJ, Ernst, AA, Sills, MR, et al. Development of a novel measure of overcrowding in a pediatric emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care 2007;23:641–5, doi:10.1097/PEC.0b013e31814a69e2.Google Scholar
11. Sinclair, D. Emergency department overcrowding – implications for pediatric emergency medicine. Emerg Med 2007;12:491–4.Google Scholar
12. National Center for Health Statistics. Health, United States, 2012: with special features on emergency care. (05/30/2013). Hyattsville (MD); 2012. Available at: (accessed July 3, 2013).Google Scholar
13. British Columbia Statistics. BC Stats population estimates. 2012. Available at: (accessed January 7, 2013).Google Scholar
14. Warren, DW, Jarvis, A, Leblanc, L, Gravel, J. Revisions to the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale Paediatric Guidelines (PaedCTAS). CJEM 2008;10:224–32.Google Scholar
15. Gravel, J, Gouin, S, Goldman, RD, et al. The Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale for children: a prospective multicenter evaluation. Ann Emerg Med 2012;60:71–7.e3, doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.12.004.Google Scholar
16. Gravel, J, Manzano, S, Arsenault, M. Validity of the Canadian Paediatric Triage and Acuity Scale in a tertiary care hospital. CJEM 2009;11:23–8. Available at: (accessed January 14, 2013).Google Scholar
17. Gravel, J, Gouin, S, Manzano, S, et al. Interrater agreement between nurses for the Pediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale in a tertiary care center. Acad Emerg Med 2008;15:1262–7, doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00268.x.Google Scholar