Introduction: The purpose of this study was to identify, through self-assessment, how comfortable rural emergency medicine (EM) practitioners are in treating critically ill trauma patients, the resources available to treat such patients and their comfort with performing trauma procedures. Our goal is to enhance rural trauma care by identifying obstacles rural EM physicians face in Saskatchewan. Methods: This was a cross sectional survey study, emailed to family physicians practicing rural EM in Saskatchewan identified through the Saskatchewan Medical Association database. Inclusion criteria included physicians who are providing EM care currently or within the past year. Rural was assumed to be communities in Saskatchewan that were outside of Saskatoon and Regina. The survey was an anonymous self-assessment regarding demographics, training, hospital resources and comfort. Results: 113 physicians of the 479 rural physicians agreed to participate, 78 met our inclusion criteria. Most (67%) were from communities with less than 10,000 population, 70% had less than 300 ED visits per month. Most (68%) were less than 45 years of age. In terms of training, 57% had completed undergraduate training out of Canada and 63% had completed residency training in Canada. Most had been practicing for more than 2 years (76%). Most (59%) had current ATLS credentials, however only 37% had ever completed the EDE course. Regarding available resources, most centers had plain radiography (99%), POCUS (68%), PRBC (78%) and TXA (93%). However, fresh frozen plasma (41%) and platelets (26%) were not widely available. Comfort was measured on a Likert scale. The types of trauma that respondents were least comfortable with included pediatric (39%), vascular (46%), spine (56%) and genitourinary (60%). The types skills that participants were least comfortable with included pericardiocentesis (19%), and surgical airway (25%). The majority had not performed Pediatric endotracheal tube insertion (79%), surgical airways (99%), pericardiocentesis (99%), central venous line placement (80%) and needle thoracentesis (71%) within the past 12 months. Conclusion: This self-assessment helped us identify aspects of rural trauma medicine that are the most challenging for rural practitioners. Understanding the most difficult challenges in light of the critical resources available to rural trauma medicine providers will inform future professional development initiatives.