Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-2l2gl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T13:34:41.611Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Individual emergency physician admission rates: predictably unpredictable

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2015

David Mutrie*
Affiliation:
Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre, Thunder Bay, Ont. Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, Ont.
S. Kathleen Bailey
Affiliation:
Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, Ont.
Saleem Malik
Affiliation:
Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre, Thunder Bay, Ont. Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, Ont.
*
980 Oliver Rd., Thunder Bay ON P7B 6V4; dmutrie@tbaytel.net

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

We sought to determine the degree and possible causes of variability in admission practices among individual emergency physicians (EPs) at 1 emergency department (ED) using a Canadian Emergency Department Triage Acuity Scale (CTAS)–matched ED patient population.

Methods:

We distributed a survey measuring attitudes and demographics to all EPs (n = 30) at a large regional hospital. Hospital admissions data from 1 calendar year were matched to individual EP survey results. Emergency physicians were ranked as “lower,” “average” or “higher” admitters and, using these categorical variables, the data set was analyzed for correlations and trends.

Results:

Overall, 97.0% of the EPs responded to the survey. Admissions by EPs ranged from 8.7% to 17.0%, (mean 12.52, standard deviation [SD] 2.21) of all patients seen. CTAS category–specific admission data demonstrated variability in the admission ranking of individual EPs. No EPs consistently performed at any 1 admission ranking across all CTAS categories. More years of emergency medicine experience was significantly correlated with higher admissions in the CTAS-2 ranking (r = 0.4, p < 0.05). Whether a physician worked full-time, part-time or as a locum was not associated with patterns of admission, nor was any particular postgraduate certification (e.g., CCFP, CCFP EM, FRCPC) or any of the surveyed attitudinal traits.

Conclusion:

Individual EPs' overall and CTAS-specific admissions varied substantially, and followed an approximately normal distribution curve. Emergency physicians with more years of experience had a statistically higher CTAS-2 admission rate; however, other variables, including postgraduate certification status, decision-related attitudes toward admission, and reported practices were not associated with admission proportions. Emergency physicians tend to have uniquely individual admission ranking profiles across all the CTAS categories.

Type
Original Research • Recherche originale
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2009

References

1.Schull, MJ, Slaughter, PM, Redelmeier, DA. Urban emergency department overcrowding: defining the problem and eliminating misconceptions. CJEM 2002;4:7683.Google Scholar
2.Asplin, BR, Magid, DJ, Rhodes, KV, et al. A conceptual model of emergency department crowding. Ann Emerg Med 2003;42:173–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Estey, A, Ness, K, Saunders, LD, et al. Understanding the causes of overcrowding in emergency departments in the Capital Health Region in Alberta: a focus group study. CJEM 2003;5: 8794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians. Taking action on the issue of overcrowding in Canada’s emergency departments. Ottawa (ON): The Association; 2005. Available: http://www.waittimealliance.ca/waittimes/CAEP.pdf (accessed 2009 Jan 26).Google Scholar
5.Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians and the National Emergency Nurses Affiliation. Joint Position Statement. Access to acute care in the setting of emergency department overcrowding [policy]. CJEM 2003;5:81–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Physician Hospital Care Committee. Improving access to emergency care: addressing system issues, August 2006, Report of the Physician Hospital Care Committee. Toronto (ON): Ontario Hospital Association, Ontario Medical Association, Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care; 2006.Google Scholar
7.Drummond, AJ. No room at the inn: overcrowding in Ontario’s emergency departments. CJEM 2002;4:91–7.Google Scholar
8.Canadian Institute for Health Information. Understanding emergency department wait times. Who is using emergency departments and how long are they waiting? Toronto (ON): The Institute; 2005. Available: http://secure.cihi.ca/cihiweb/products/Wait_times_e.pdf. (accessed 2009 Jan 26).Google Scholar
9.Ting, HH, Lee, TH, Soukup, JR, et al. Impact of physician experience on triage of emergency room patients with acute chest pain at three teaching hospitals. Am J Med 1991;91:401–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Donohoe, MT, Kravitz, RL, Wheeler, DB, et al. Reasons for outpatient referral from generalists to specialists. J Gen Intern Med 1999;14:281–6.Google Scholar
11.Davis, DA, Taylor-Vaisey, A. Translating guidelines into practice: a systematic review of theoretic concepts, practical experience and research evidence in the adoption of clinical practice guidelines. CMAJ 1997;157:408–16.Google Scholar
12.Ellrodt, AG, Conner, L, Riedinger, M, et al. Measuring and improving physician compliance with clinical practice guidelines: a controlled interventional trial. Ann Intern Med 1995;122:277–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Pearson, SD, Goldman, L, Orav, EJ, et al. Triage decisions for emergency department patients with chest pain: Do physician’s risk attitudes make the difference? J Gen Intern Med 1995;10:557–64.Google Scholar
14.Nightingale, SD. Risk preference and admitting rates of emergency room physicians. Med Care 1988;26:84–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Reilly, BM, Evans, AT, Schaider, JJ, et al. Triage of patients with chest pain in the emergency department: a comparative study of physicians’ decisions. Am J Med 2002;112:95103.Google Scholar