Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T08:12:10.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Measurement of the Productive Capacity of Wealth*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2014

E. F. Beach*
Affiliation:
McGill University
Get access

Extract

During the last two decades, considerable progress has been made in the measurement of national income, while the measurement of national wealth has lagged. This situation contrasts with the fact that it was wealth rather than income in which economists were first interested. The late Lord Stamp read a paper to a meeting of the Royal Statistical Society in 1919, in which he discussed the wealth and income of the chief powers of the world. In this paper he considered some eighteen countries for which there were eighteen estimates of national wealth, but only ten of these countries had estimates of national income. Professor Bye, in the second volume of the National Bureau of Economic Research series entitled Conference on Research in National Income and Wealth, goes back even farther to show this change in interest. It may be pointed out that Adam Smith called his famous book The Wealth of Nations.

Only since the last war has great progress been made in the measurement of national income. The increase in accuracy of the estimates has brought about an increase in their use until now they serve as legitimate bases for all sorts of comparisons. They stand in somewhat the same position as population estimates, as fundamental points of reference. This development is one of foremost importance in the social sciences. There seems to be little question that adequate measurements of income are more useful than equally adequate estimates of wealth. The former is a measurement of the effectiveness of the working of the economy. The latter is but one of the factors in its working.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association 1941

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This paper was read at the round table on Economic Theory at the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association at Kingston, May 22, 1941.

References

1 Friedman, Milton (ed.), Conference on Research in National Income and Wealth: Studies in Income and Wealth. 3 vols. (New York, National Bureau of Economic Research, 19371939).Google Scholar

2 Marshall, Alfred, Principles of Economics: An Introductory Volume (London, 1890), p. 593.Google Scholar

3 Winfrey, R. and Kurtz, E. B., Life Characteristics of Physical Property (Iowa State College, Ames, Iowa, Bulletin no. 103, vol. XXX, 06 17, 1931).Google Scholar

4 Fabricant, Solomon, Capital Consumption and Adjustment (New York, National Bureau of Economic Research, 1938), chap. X.Google Scholar

5 Further problems which arise in the measurement of wealth are discussed in the chapter on Maintaining Capital Intact,” in the Economics of Welfare (London, 1920)Google Scholar by A. C. Pigou, and in S. S. Kuznet's contribution to part I of the second volume of the Conference on Research in National Income and Wealth, Studies.

6 Agricultural land as commonly understood generally has an element of capital contained in it.

7 MacGregor, D. C., “Gross and Net Investment in Canada: Tentative Estimates” (Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, vol. VII, 02, 1941, pp. 3968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8 Report of the Royal Commission on Dominion-Provincial Relations, book I, (Ottawa, 1939), p. 116.

9 Fabricant, Capital Consumption and Adjustment.

10 Kuznets, S. S., National Income and Capital Formation, 1910-1935 (New York, National Bureau of Economic Research, 1937).Google Scholar

11 See Copeland, M. A. and Martin, E. M., in Conference on Research in National Income and Wealth, Studies, vol. II, pp. 99 ff Google Scholar

12 Beach, E. F., “A Measure of Physical Capital” (Review of Economic Statistics, vol. XX, 02, 1938, pp. 1120).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13 Kreps, T. J., “Consumption: A Vast Undeveloped Economic Frontier” (American Economic Review, vol. XXX, 02, 1941, pp. 177–99).Google Scholar

14 See Capital Formation and its Elements (New York, National Industrial Conference Board, 1939), p. 10.Google Scholar