Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-rvbq7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T01:24:34.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

II. Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2014

J. A. Maxwell
Affiliation:
Clark University
Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Federal Public Finance: Canada, Australia, South Africa
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association 1937

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Report of the Royal Commission on the Natural Resources of Saskatchewan (Ottawa, 1935), p. 39.Google Scholar

2 Second Report, p. 37.

2 Third Report, p. 19.

2 Third Report, p. 89.

5 The work of the Commission has produced incidental benefits, not related to its main task. One instance is especially notable. In Tasmania the standard of maintenance of most capital assets—railways, roads, bridges, etc.—had been very inadequate, apparently because of an attempt to minimize budget deficits. The Commission brought this fact to the light and in 1933-4 Tasmania reformed its financial practice by making adequate provision for maintenance. Correct and clear presentation of the public accounts is a great advantage and it can be anticipated that, as a result of the work of the Commission, the financial statements of the Australian states will be improved.

6 Third Report, p. 147.