Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T11:48:50.280Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XENOBORUS REUTER (1908): A NEW SYNONYM OF TROPIDOSTEPTES UHLER (1878), WITH DESCRIPTION OF A NEW SPECIES (HETEROPTERA: MIRIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Leonard A. Kelton
Leonard A. Kelton
Affiliation:
Biosystematics Research Institute, Canada Agriculture, Ottawa K1A 0C6
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Xenoborus Reuter is synonymized with Tropidosteptes Uhler. Tropidosteptes brooksi n. sp. is described from Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario, and Quebec. The species was collected on Fraxinus spp.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 110 , Issue 5 , 01 May 1978 , pp. 471 - 473
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carvalho, J.C.M. 1954. Neotropical Miridae, LXXVII: Miscellaneous observations in some European museums (Hemiptera). An. Acad. Brasil Cienc. 26: 423–427.Google Scholar
Distant, W.L. 1850–1893. Insecta. Rhynchota. Hemiptera-Heteroptera. Biologia cent-am. 1. 462 pp.Google Scholar
Kelton, L.A. 1959. Male genitalia as taxonomic characters in the Miridae (Hemiptera). Can. Ent. 91, Suppl. 11. 72 pp.Google Scholar
Knight, H. H. 1917. Notes on species of Miridae inhabiting ash trees (Fraxinus) with the description of a new species (Hemip.). Bull. Brooklyn ent. Soc. 12: 80–82.Google Scholar
Knight, H. H. 1925. Descriptions of thirty new species and two new genera of North American Miridae (Hemiptera). Bull. Brooklyn ent. Soc. 20: 33–58.Google Scholar
Knight, H. H. 1927. Descriptions of twelve new species of Miridae from the District of Columbia and vicinity (Hemiptera). Proc. biol. Soc. Wash. 40: 9–18.Google Scholar
Knight, H. H. 1929. New species of Neoborus and Xenoborus (Hemiptera: Miridae). Bull. Brooklyn ent. Soc. 24: 1–11.Google Scholar
Reuter, O.M. 1908. Neoborus (Xenoborus, n. subg.) commissuralis, n. sp. In Van Duzee, E.P., List of Hemiptera taken by Palmer, W.J., about Quinze Lake P. Que., in 1907. Can. Ent. 40: 109–116.Google Scholar
Reuter, O.M. 1909. Bermerkungen über nearktische Capsiden nebst Beschreibung neuer Arten. Acta Soc. Sci. fenn. 36. 86 pp.Google Scholar
Slater, J.A. 1950. An investigation of the female genitalia as taxonomic characters in the Miridae (Hemiptera). Iowa St. Coll. J. Sci. 25: 1–81.Google Scholar
Uhler, P.R. 1878. Notices of the Hemiptera Heteroptera in the Collection of the late T.W. Harris, M.D. Proc. Boston Soc. nat. Hist. 19: 365–446.Google Scholar
Van Duzee, E.P. 1916 a. Synoptical keys to the genera of the North America Miridae. Univ. Calif. Publs Ent. 1: 199–216.Google Scholar
Van Duzee, E.P. 1916 b. Check list of the Hemiptera (excepting the Aphididae, Aleurodidae and Coccidae) of America, north of Mexico. New York.Google Scholar