Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T21:14:39.593Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

WITHIN-TREE DISTRIBUTION OF THE PUPAE OF THANASIMUS DUBIUS (COLEOPTERA: CLERIDAE), A PREDATOR OF THE SOUTHERN PINE BEETLE (COLEOPTERA: SCOLYTIDAE)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Russell F. Mizell III  and
T. Evan Nebeker
Russell F. Mizell III
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State 39762
T. Evan Nebeker
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State 39762
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Regression models of the form lnY = b0 + b1ln(X−c) + b2X are presented that describe the within-tree distribution of the pupae of Thanasimus dubius (F.), a clerid predator of the southern pine beetle, Dendroctonus frontalis Zimm. More T. dubius pupae/100 cm2 of bark area were found in loblolly pine, Pinus taeda L., than in shortleaf pine, P. echinata Miller, and the number increased with increasing tree diameter class. Peak densities were found at a height of 1–4 m.

Résumé

Des modèles de régression de la forme lnY = b0 + b1ln(X−c) + b2X sont utilisés afin de décrire la distribution intra-arbre des pupes de Thanasimus dubius (F.), un cléride prédateur du dendroctone méridional du pin, Dendroctonus frontalis Zimm. Un nombre plus élevé de pupes de T. dubius/100 cm2 ont été trouvées sur Pinus taeda L., que sur P. echinata Miller, et le nombre augmente avec le diamètre de l’arbre. Les densités maximales ont été observées à une hauteur de 1 à 4 m.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 113 , Issue 5 , May 1981 , pp. 387 - 394
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berryman, A. A. 1966. Studies on the behavior and development of Enoclerus lecontei (Wolcott), a predator of the western pine beetle. Can. Ent. 98: 519–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulson, R. N., Mayyasi, A. M., Foltz, J. L., and Pulley, P. E.. 1976. Production flow system evolution of within-tree populations of Dendroctonus frontalis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Environ. Ent. 5: 375–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulson, R. N., Fargo, W. S., Pulley, P. E., Pope, D. N.. Foltz, J. L., and Bunting, A. M.. 1979. Spatial and temporal pattern of emergence for within-tree populations of Dendroctonus frontalis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can. Ent. 111: 273–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeMars, C. J., Berryman, A. A., Dahlsten, D. L., Otvos, I. S., and Sark, R. W.. 1970. Spatial and temporal variations in the distribution of the western pine beetle, its predators and parasites, and woodpecker activity in infested trees. pp. 80–101in Stark, R. W. and Dahlsten, D. L. (Eds.), Studies on the Population Dynamics of the Western Pine Beetle, Dendroctonus brevicomis (LeConte) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Univ. Calif. Press.Google Scholar
Dix, M. E. and Franklin, R. T.. 1977. Diel activity of Thanasimus dubius, a southern pine beetle predator. J. Ga ent. Soc. 12: 71–75.Google Scholar
Dixon, W. N. and Payne, T. L.. 1979. Aggregation of Thanasimus dubius on trees under mass attack by the southern pine beetle. Environ. Ent. 8: 178–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foltz, J. L., Pulley, P. E., Coulson, R. N., and Martin, W. C.. 1977. Procedural guide for estimating the within-spot populations of Dendroctonus frontalis. Misc. Publ. Tx agric. Exp. Stn 1316: 27 pp.Google Scholar
Kroll, J. C. and Fleet, R. R.. 1979. Impact of woodpecker predation on overwintering within-tree populations of the southern pine beetle. In Dickson, J., Conner, H. R., Fleet, R., Jackson, J., and Kroll, J. (Eds.), Role of Insectivorous Birds in Forest Ecosystems. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
LaMotte, L. R. and Hocking, R. R.. 1970. Computational efficiency in selection of regression variables. Technometrics 12: 83–93.Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. 1972. Southern pine beetle mortality in North Carolina caused by parasites and predators. Environ. Ent. 1: 58–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nebeker, T. E., Hocking, R. R., Hackney, O. P., and Lashomb, J. H.. 1978. A comparison of non-linear and linear models for describing gallery length distribution of Dendroctonus frontalis attacking shortleaf pine. Environ. Ent. 7: 636–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nebeker, T. E. and Purser, G. C.. 1980. Relationship of temperature and prey type to developmental time of the bark beetle predator Thanasimus dubius (Coleoptera: Cleridae). Can. Ent. 112: 179–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nie, N. N., Hull, C. H., Jenkins, J. G., Steinbrenner, K., and Bent, D.H.. 1975. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York. 675 pp.Google Scholar
Pulley, P. E., Foltz, J. L., Coulson, R. N., and Martin, W. C.. 1977. Evaluation of procedures for estimating within-spot populations of attacking adult Dendroctonus frontalis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can. Ent. 109: 1325–1334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, C. R. and Coster, J. E.. 1977. Distribution of some predators and parasites of the southern pine beetle in two species of pine. Environ. Ent. 6: 689–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephen, F. M. and Taha, H. A.. 1976. Optimization of sampling effort for within-tree populations of the southern pine beetle and its natural enemies. Environ. Ent. 5: 1001–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephen, F. M. and Taha, H. A.. 1979. Area wide estimation of southern pine beetle populations. Environ. Ent. 8: 850–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thatcher, R. C. and Pickard, L. S.. 1966. The clerid beetle Thanasimus dubius; a predator of the southern pine beetle. J. econ. Ent. 59: 955–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vité, J. P. and Williamson, D. L.. 1970. Thanasimus dubius: prey perception. J. Insect Physiol. 16: 233–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar