Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T23:40:58.873Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Validation of a methodology for rearing Spalangia cameroni (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) on Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2014

J. Tormos*
Affiliation:
Área de Zoología, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Salamanca, 37071-Salamanca, Spain
B. Sabater-Muñoz
Affiliation:
Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias, Unidad Asociada de Entomología, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias/Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Apartado Oficial, 46113-Moncada, Valencia, Spain.
J.D. Asís
Affiliation:
Área de Zoología, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Salamanca, 37071-Salamanca, Spain
F. Beitia
Affiliation:
Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias, Unidad Asociada de Entomología, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias/Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Apartado Oficial, 46113-Moncada, Valencia, Spain.
*
1Corresponding author (e-mail: tormos@usal.es).

Abstract

Spalangia cameroni Perkins (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) is a pupal parasitoid of the Medfly, Ceratitis capitata (Wiedmann) (Diptera: Tephritidae), one of the principal pests of Spanish agriculture. Spalangia cameroni is a potential biocontrol agent for this pest if methods can be developed to mass-rear it effectively on C. capitata. Here, we report on the use of freeze-killed pupae of C. capitata to maintain a laboratory colony of S. cameroni, with a view to setting up a mass-rearing protocol. Realised fecundity, adult progeny, sex ratio, and superparasitism level were the principal parameters analysed. No significant differences were found in respect of these parameters between living or freeze-killed Medfly pupae used as hosts, although sex ratios showed a bias towards females in the case of freeze-killed pupae. Freeze-killed pupae were concluded to present the best option for the laboratory-rearing of S. cameroni, on account of ease of rearing, and avoidance of the emergence of Medfly adults.

Type
Insect Management
Copyright
© Entomological Society of Canada 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Subject editor: Kevin Floate

References

Birkemoe, T., Soleng, A., and Aak, A. 2009. Biological control of Musca domestica and Stomoxys calcitrans by mass releases of the parasitoid Spalangia cameroni on two Norwegian pig farms. BioControl, 54: 425436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böckmann, E.A., Tormos, J., Beitia, F., and Fischer, K. 2012. Offspring production and self-superparasitism in the solitary ectoparasitoid Spalangia cameroni (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) in relation to host abundance. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 102: 131137.Google Scholar
Cancino, J. and Montoya, P. 2006. Advances and perspectives in the mass rearing of fruit flies parasitoids in Mexico. In Proceedings of the seventh international symposium on fruit flies of economic importance. Fruit flies of economic importance: from basic to applied knowledge. 10–16 September 2006. Edited by R.L. Sugayama, R.A. Zucchi, S.M. Ovruski, and J. Sivinski. Biofábrica Moscamed Brazil, Salvador, Brazil. Pp. 133142.Google Scholar
European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization. 2012. PQR – Plant Quarantine Data Retrieval System. The EPPO database on quarantine pests [online]. Available from http://www.eppo.int/DATABASES/pqr/pqr.htm [accessed 10 March 2013].Google Scholar
Falcó, J.V., Garzón-Luque, E., Pérez-Hinarejos, M., Tarazona, I., Malagón, J., and Beitia, F. 2006. Two natural pupal parasitoids of Ceratitis capitata (Diptera, Tephritidae) found in Spain. International Organisation for Biological and Integrated Control-West Palaearctic Regional Section Bulletin, 29: 7174.Google Scholar
Falcó, J.V., Verdú, M.J., and Beitia, F. 2004. Spalangia cameroni (Hymenoptera, Pteromalidae), un nuevo parasitoide en España de Ceratitis capitata (Diptera, Tephritidae). In XI Congresso Iberico de Entomologia. Madeira, Portugal: Funchal 13–17 September 2004. Edited by D.A. Pombo. Universidade da Madeira, Funchal, Portugal. Pp. 155.Google Scholar
Fimiani, P. 1989. Mediterranean region. In Fruit flies: their biology, natural enemies, and control. Edited by A.S. Robinson and G. Hooper. Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Pp. 3750.Google Scholar
Fletcher, B.S. 1989. Life history strategies of tephritid fruit flies. In Fruit flies: their biology, natural enemies, and control. Edited by A.S. Robinson and G. Hooper. Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Pp. 195208.Google Scholar
Floate, K.D. 2002. Production of filth fly parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) on fresh and on freeze-killed and stored house fly pupae. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 12: 595603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geden, C.J. and Kaufman, P.E. 2007. Development of Spalangia cameroni and Muscidifurax raptor (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) on live house fly (Diptera: Muscidae) pupae and pupae killed by heat shock, irradiation and cold. Environmental Entomology, 36: 3439.Google Scholar
Kaufman, P.E. and Geden, C.J. 2009. Development of Spalangia cameroni and Muscidifurax raptor (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) on live and freeze-killed house fly (Diptera: Muscidae) pupae. Florida Entomologist, 92: 492496.Google Scholar
King, B.H. 1998. Host age response in the parasitoid wasp Spalangia cameroni (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). Journal of Insect Behavior, 11: 101117.Google Scholar
King, B.H. and King, R.B. 1994. Sex ratio manipulation in response to host size in the parasitoid wasp Spalangia cameroni: is it adaptive? Behavioral Ecology, 5: 448454.Google Scholar
Klunker, R. and Fabritius, K. 1992. Ergebnisse und erfahrungen mit der stammhaltung und massenzucht einiger pupariumparasitoide von fliegen auf kaltekonservierten wirtspuparien. Mitteilungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Allgemeine und Angewandte Entomologie, 8: 287294.Google Scholar
Liquido, N.J., Shinoda, L.A., and Cunningham, R.T. 1991. Host plants of the Mediterranean fruit fly: an annotated world review. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 77: 152.Google Scholar
Martins, D.S., Skouri, W., Chermiti, B., Aboussaid, H., El Messoussi, S., Oufdou, K., et al. 2010. Analysis of two larval-pupal parasitoids (Hymenoptera, Braconidae). In The biological control of Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) in Spanish Mediterranean areas. Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on fruit flies of economic importance. Edited by B. Sabater, V. Navarro, and A. Urbaneja. Universitat Politècnica de València, València, Spain. Pp. 252258.Google Scholar
Monzó, C., Sabater-Muñoz, B., Urbaneja, A., and Castañera, P. 2010. Tracking medfly predation by the wolf spider, Pardosa cribata Simon, in citrus orchards using PCR-based gut-content analysis. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 100: 145152.Google Scholar
Morgan, P.B., Smittle, B.J., and Patterson, R.S. 1986. Use of irradiated pupae to mass culture the microhymenopterous pupal parasitoid Spalangia endius Walker (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). I. Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae). Journal of Entomological Science, 21: 222227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muñiz, M. and Gil, A. 1984. Desarollo y reprodución de Ceratitis capitata Wied. en condiciones artificiales. In Boletín-Servicio de Defensa contra Plagas e Inspección Fitopatológica: fuera de serie 2. Servicio de Defensa Contra Plagas e Inspección Fitopatológica, Madrid, Spain. Pp. 1140.Google Scholar
Ogawa, K., Ito, K., Fukuda, T., Tebayashi, S., and Arakawa, R. 2012. Host suitability of house fly, Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae), pupae killed by high or low temperature treatment for a parasitoid, Spalangia endius (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) [online]. The Scientific World Journal. doi: 10.1100/2012/214907. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3463168 [accessed 18 February 2014].Google Scholar
Pérez-Hinarejos, M. and Beitia, F. 2008. Parasitism of Spalangia cameroni (Hymenoptera, Pteromalidae), an idiobiont parasitoid on pupae of Ceratitis capitata (Diptera, Tephritidae). International Organisation for Biological and Integrated Control-West Palaearctic Regional Section Bulletin, 38: 130133.Google Scholar
Roth, J.P., Fincher, G.T., and Summerlin, J.W. 1991. Suitability of irradiated or freeze-killed horn fly (Diptera: Muscidae) pupae as hosts for hymenopterous parasitoids. Journal of Economic Entomology, 85: 9498.Google Scholar
San Andrés, V., Ortego, F., and Castañera, P. 2007. Efecto de la radiación gamma sobre la actividad digestiva y longevidad de machos estériles de Ceratitis capitata . Levante Agrícola: Revista internacional de cítricos, 385: 116120.Google Scholar
Tormos, J., Asís, J.D., Sabater-Muñoz, B., Baños, L., Gayubo, S., and Beitia, F. 2012. Superparasitism in laboratory rearing of Spalangia cameroni (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae), a parasitoid of medfly (Diptera: Tephritidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research, 102: 5161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tormos, J., Beitia, F., Alonso, M., Asís, J.D., and Gayubo, S. 2010. Assessment of Ceratitis capitata (Diptera, Tephritidae) pupae killed by heat or cold as hosts for rearing Spalangia cameroni (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). Annals of Applied Biology, 156: 179185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tormos, J., Beitia, F., Böckmann, E.A., and Asís, J.D. 2009. The preimaginal stages and development of Spalangia cameroni Perkins (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) on Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Micron, 40: 646658.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Urbaneja, A. and Jacas, J. 2008. Tipos de control biológico y métodos para su implementación. In Control biológico de plagas agrícolas. Edited by J. Jacas and A. Urbaneja. Phytoma-España, València, Spain. Pp. 1524.Google Scholar
Weems, H.V. 1981. Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Entomology Circulars, Division of Plant Industry, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 230: 18.Google Scholar
Wyckhuys, K.A.G., López Acosta, F., García, J., and Jiménez, J. 2011. Host exploitation and contest behavior in a generalist parasitoid partially reflect quality of distinct host species. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 21: 953968.Google Scholar