Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-4hvwz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T16:14:11.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

TEMPORAL PATTERNS IN LIFE HISTORY AND FLIGHT BEHAVIOUR OF PYCNOPSYCHE GENTILIS, P. LUCULENTA, AND P. SCABRIPENNIS (TRICHOPTERA: LIMNEPHILIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Rosemary J. Mackay
Rosemary J. Mackay
Affiliation:
Biology Department, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Three species of Pycnopsyche occur in West Creek, the larvae inhabiting allochthonous organic materials. The rapid growth, and early aestivation and emergence of the rarest species, P. scabripennis (Rambur), diminishes interspecific interactions between larvae. P. gentilis (McLachlan) and P. luculenta (Betten) are contemporaneous and the larvae are similar in size but differ in case materials and habitat preferences. Adult males of each species differ in the peak time of arrival at light when active on the same night. The life history and behaviour patterns are discussed in relation to the coexistence of congeneric species.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 104 , Issue 11 , November 1972 , pp. 1819 - 1835
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Betten, C. 1934. The caddis flies or Trichoptera of New York State. N.Y. St. Mus. Bull. 292. pp. 1–576.Google Scholar
Betten, C. 1950. The genus Pycnopsyche(Trichoptera). Ann. ent, Soc. Am. 43: 508–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbet, P. S. 1964. Temporal patterns of emergence in aquatic insects. Can. Ent. 96: 264–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crichton, M. I. 1960. A study of captures of Trichoptera in a light trap near Reading, Berkshire. Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 112: 319–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crichton, M. I. 1961. Observations on the longevity and dispersal of adult Limnephilidae (Trichoptera). Int. Kong. Ent. Wein, Vol. 1, pp. 366–371.Google Scholar
Crichton, M. I. 1965. Observations on captures of Trichoptera in suction- and light-traps near Reading, Berkshire. Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (A) 40: 101–108.Google Scholar
Edwards, D. K. 1962. Laboratory determinations of the daily flight times of separate sexes of some moths in naturally changing light. Can. J. Zool. 40: 511–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flint, O. S. 1960. Taxonomy and biology of Nearctic limnephilid larvae (Trichoptera) with special reference to species in eastern United States. Entomologica am. 40: 1–120.Google Scholar
Gower, A. M. 1965. The life cycle of Drusus annulatus Steph. (Trich., Limnephilidae) in watercress beds. Entoniologist's mon. Mag. 101: 133–141.Google Scholar
Gower, A. M. 1967. A study of Limnephilus lunatus Curtis (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae) with reference to its life cycle in watercress beds. Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 119: 283–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, P. R. and Mackay, R. J.. 1969. Ecological segregation of systematically related stream insects. Can. J. Zool. 47: 691–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hynes, H. B. N. 1970. The ecology of running waters. Liverpool Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Mackay, R. J. 1969. Aquatic insect communities of a small stream on Mont St. Hilaire, Quebec. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 26: 1157–1183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackay, R. J. and Kalff, J.. 1969. Seasonal variation in standing crop and species diversity in a small Quebec stream. Ecology 50: 101–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackay, R. J. Ecology of two related species of caddis fly larvae in the organic substrates of a woodland stream. Ecology (in press).Google Scholar
Mayr, E. 1963. Animal species and evolution. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Mass.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nimmo, A. 1966. The arrival pattern of Trichoptera at artificial light near Montreal, Quebec. Quaest. ent. 2: 217–242.Google Scholar
Novak, K. and Sehnal, F.. 1963. The developmental cycle of some species of the genus Limnephilus (Trichoptera). Čas. čsl. Spol. ent. 60: 68–80.Google Scholar
Robertson, A. G. 1939. The nocturnal activity of crane-flies (Tipulinae) as indicated by captures in a light trap at Rothamsted. J. Anim. Ecol. 8: 300–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, H. H. 1956. The evolution and classification of the mountain caddis flies. Univ. Illinois Press, Urbana.Google Scholar
Ross, H. H. 1963. Stream communities and terrestrial biomes. Arch. Hydrobiol. 59: 235–242.Google Scholar
Ross, H. H. 1967. The evolution and past dispersal of the Trichoptera. A. Rev. Ent. 12: 169–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, D. 1962. Electrophysiological investigation on the olfactory specificity of sexual attracting substances in different species of moths. J. Insect Physiol. 8: 15–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southwood, T. R. E. 1966. Ecological methods with particular reference to the study of insect populations. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Ulfstrand, S. 1970. Trichoptera from River Vindelälven in Swedish Lapland. Ent. Tidskr. 91: 46–63.Google Scholar
Webster, D. A. and Webster, P. C.. 1943. Influence of water current on case weight in larvae of the caddis fly Goera clacarata Banks. Can. Ent. 75: 105–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, C. B. 1935. The times of activity of certain nocturnal insects, chiefly Lepidoptera, as indicated by a light trap. Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 83: 523–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar