Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-02T02:27:52.602Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

SYSTEMATICS OF NORTH AMERICAN CHRYSOPID LARVAE: CHRYSOPA CARNEA GROUP (NEUROPTERA)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Catherine A. Tauber
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York

Abstract

Larvae of the family Chrysopidae possess characteristics useful in classification at the species, genus, and subfamily levels. This study, which initiates a comprehensive analysis of chrysopid larval systematics, describes the important external characteristics of the family and discusses those features which vary between taxa within the family.

The carnea- group of the Chrysopa, subgenus Chrysoperla, includes six described North American species, most of which are important in pest management. This paper defines the series of characters unique to the larvae of this taxon, presents a key to all larval instars of the six species, and describes the three larval instars of each species, most of which were previously undescribed.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, P. A. 1963. Taxonomy of Hawaiian Chrysopa (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Proc. Hawaiian ent. Soc. 18: 221223.Google Scholar
Adams, P. A. 1967. A review of the Mesochrysinae and Nothochrysinae (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Bull. Mus. comp. Zool. 135: 215238.Google Scholar
Agekjan, N. G. 1973. Neuroptera feeding on bamboo aphids in Adzhavia and their parasites. Rev. Ent. U.R.S.S. 52: 549564.Google Scholar
Clancy, D. W. 1946. The insect parasites of the Chrysopidae (Neuroptera). Univ. Calif. Publs Ent. 7: 403496.Google Scholar
Doutt, R. L. and Hagen, K. S.. 1950. Biological control measures applied against Pseudococcus maritimus on pears. J. econ. Ent. 43: 9496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagen, K. S., Sawall, E. F., and Tassan, R. L.. 1971. The use of food sprays to increase effectiveness of entomophagous insects.Proc. Tall Timbers Conf. on Ecot. Anim. Control, No. 2, pp. 5981.Google Scholar
Hagen, K. S. and van den Bosch, R.. 1968. Impact of pathogens, parasites and predators on aphids. A. Rev. Ent. 13: 325384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinton, H. E. 1958. The phylogeny of the Panorpoid orders. A. Rev. Ent. 3: 181206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Killington, F. J. 19361937. A monograph of the British Neuroptera. Vols. I, II. Roy. Soc., Lond.Google Scholar
Kimmins, D. E. 1952. A revision of the genera of the Apochrysinae (Fam. Chrysopidae). Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (12) 5: 929944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knerer, G. and Atwood, C. E.. 1973. Diprionid sawflies: polymorphism and speciation. Science, Wash. 179: 10901099.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayr, E. 1969. Principles of systematic zoology. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Muma, M. H. 1959. Chrysopidae associated with citrus in Florida. Fla Ent. 42: 2129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumark, S. 1952. Chrysopa carnea Stephens and its enemies in Israel. For. Res. Stn, Ilanoth 1: 1125.Google Scholar
Pariser, K. 1917. Beiträge zur Biologie und Morphologie der einheimischen Chrysopiden. Arch. Naturgesch. 83: 157.Google Scholar
Principi, M. M. 1940, 1946, 1947, 1954, 1956. Contributi allo studio dei Neurotteri italiani. I. Chrysopa septempunctata Wesm. e Chrysopa flavifrons Brauer. IV. Nothochrysa italica Rossi. V. Ricerche su Chrysopa formosa Brauer e su alcuni suoi parassiti. XI. Chrysopa vividana Schn. XIII. Studio morfologico, etologico e sistematico di un gruppo omogeneo di specie del gen. Chrysopa Leach (C. flavifrons Brauer, prasina Burm. e clathrata Schn.). Boll. Istit. ent. Univ. Bologna 12: 63144 (1940); 15: 85–102 (1946); 16: 134–175 (1947); 20: 359–376 (1954); 21: 319–410 (1956).Google Scholar
Putnam, W. L. 1937. Biological notes on the Chrysopidae. Can. J. Res. (D) 15: 2937.Google Scholar
Ridgway, R. L. 1969. Control of the bollworm and tobacco budworm through conservation and augmentation of predaceous insects. Proc. Tall Timbers Conf. on Ecol. Anim. Control, No. 1, pp. 127144.Google Scholar
Ridgway, R. L. and Jones, S. L.. 1968. Inundative releases of Chrysopa carnea for control of Heliothis. J. econ. Ent. 62: 177180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousset, A. 1966. Morphologie cephalique des larves de Planipennes (Insectes Nevropteroides). Mém. Mus. natn. Hist. nat., Paris (A, Zool.) 42: 1199.Google Scholar
Rousset, A. 1969. Morphologie thoracique des larves de Planipennes (Insectes Nevropteroides). I. Squelette et musculature des regions anterieures du thorax chez les larves de Chrysopa et de Conioptery-gides. Annls Sci. nat., Zool., Paris (12) 11: 97138.Google Scholar
Schneider, G. T. 1851. Symbolae ad Monographiam Generis Chrysopae, Leach. Vratislaviae. 178 pp.Google Scholar
Scopes, N. E. A. 1969. The potential of Chrysopa carnea as a biological control agent of Myzus persicae on glasshouse chrysanthemums. Ann. appl. Biol. 64: 433439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. C. 1922. The biology of the Chrysopidae. Mem. Cornell agric. Exp. Stn 58: 12871372.Google Scholar
Tauber, C. A. 1969. Taxonomy and biology of the lacewing genus Meleoma (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Univ. Calif. Publs Ent. 58: 194.Google Scholar
Tauber, C.A. and Tauber, M. J.. 1973. Diversification and secondary intergradation of two Chrysopa carnea strains (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Can. Ent. 105: 11531167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tjeder, B. 1966. Neuroptera–Planipennia. The lacewings of South Africa. 5. Chrysopidae. S. Afr. Animal Life 12: 228534.Google Scholar
Toschi, C. A. 1965. The taxonomy, life histories, and mating behavior of the green lacewings of Strawberry Canyon (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Hilgardia 36: 391433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Withycombe, C. L. 1923. Notes on the biology of some British Neuroptera (Planipennia). Trans. ent. Soc. Lond. 1922: 501594.Google Scholar
Withycombe, C. L. 1925. Some aspects of the biology and morphology of the Neuroptera. With special reference to the immature stages and their possible phylogenetic significance. Trans. ent. Soc. Lond. 1924: 303411.Google Scholar