Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T02:41:54.322Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A SYNONYM PROPOSED IN PERIMONES, A SYNONYM REJECTED IN WALCKENAERA, AND A NEW SPECIES DESCRIBED IN COCHLEMBOLUS (ARANEIDA: ERIGONIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

C. D. Dondale  and
J. H. Redner
C. D. Dondale
Affiliation:
Research Institute, Canada Department of Agriculture, Belleville, Ontario
J. H. Redner
Affiliation:
Research Institute, Canada Department of Agriculture, Belleville, Ontario
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Perimones britteni (Jackson, 1913) is regarded as conspecific with, and therefore a junior synonym of, Minyriolus arenarius (Emerton, 1911). Hence, Perimones arenarius (Emerton) is Holarctic. Contrary to common usage, Walckenaera spiralis (Emerton, 1882) is not a synonym of W. vigilax (Blackwall, 1853), the former applying to a North American species and the latter to a European. Cochlembolus formicarius sp. n. is described from nests of the western thatching ant, Formica obscuripes Forel, in Washington State.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 104 , Issue 10 , October 1972 , pp. 1643 - 1647
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bonnet, P. 1956–1961. Bibliographia Araneorum. Tome 2. Les Artisans de l'Imprimerie Douladoure, Toulouse.Google Scholar
Cooke, J. A. L. 1967. New and rare British spiders. J. nat. Hist. 1: 135–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crosby, C. R. 1905. A catalogue of the Erigoneae of North America, with notes and descriptions of new species. Proc. Acad. nut. Sci. Philad. 57: 301–343.Google Scholar
Crosby, C. R. and Bishop, S. C.. 1931. Studies in American spiders: genera Cornicularia, Paracornicularia, Tigellinus, Walckenaera, Epiceraticelus and Pelecopsis, with descriptions of new genera and species. Jl N.Y. ent. Soc. 39: 359–403.Google Scholar
Crosby, C. R. and Bishop, S. C.. 1933. American spiders: Erigoneae, males with cephalic pits. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 26: 105–182.Google Scholar
Emerton, J. H. 1882. New England spiders of the family Theridiidae. Trans. Conn. Acad. Arts Sci. 6: 1–86.Google Scholar
Emerton, J. H. 1911. New spiders from New England. Trans. Conn. Acad. Arts Sci. 16: 385–407.Google Scholar
Holm, A. 1968. A contribution to the spider fauna of Sweden. Zool. Bidr. Upps. 37: 183–209.Google Scholar
Jackson, A. R. 1913. On some new and obscure British spiders. Rep. Trans. Notts. Nat. Soc. 60: 20–49.Google Scholar
Jackson, A. R. 1932. On new and rare British spiders. Proc. Dorset nat. Hist. antiq. Fld Club 53: 200–214.Google Scholar
Kaston, B. J. 1948. Spiders of Connecticut. Bull. Conn. St. geol. nut. Hist. Surv. 70.Google Scholar
Locket, G. H. and Millidge, A. F.. 1953. British spiders. Vol. II. Ray Society, London.Google Scholar
Merrett, P. 1963. The palpus of male spiders of the family Linyphiidae. Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. 140: 347–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roewer, C. F. 1942. Katalog der Araneae von 1758 bis 1940, bzw. 1954. Bd. 1. Natura, Bremen.Google Scholar
Vogel, Beatrice R. 1966. Spiders of Powdermill Nature Reserve. Jl N.Y. ent. Soc. 74: 55–58.Google Scholar
Wiehle, H. 1960. Spinnentiere oder Arachnoidea (Araneae). XI. 30 Familie Micryphantidae — Zwergspinnen. Tierwelt Dtl. 47.Google Scholar