Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T01:18:33.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Survey for Grasshopper Parasites in Temperate South America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

D. C. Lloyd
D. C. Lloyd
Affiliation:
Fontana Laboratory, Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In 1937-38 the Argentine Department of Agriculture initiated an exchange of grasshopper parasite material with the Canadian Department of Agriculture which was engaged in a study of the natural control of grasshoppers in various provinces of Canada. By 1942 it was considered desirable to introduce exotic species of parasites into Canada on as wide a scale as possible, and the temperate regions of South America were selected as being the most promising for a survey. The parts of the temperate zone of South America to which preferential attention was to be given included the countries of Uruguay, Argentina, and Chile. The well known grasslands of the Rio de la Plata area have been partially transformed into one of the world centres for cereal production and as in other parts of the world increased grasshopper populations constitute a major problem in the agriculture of the region. Here species of the genus Dichroplus are frequently pests in the way in which members of the closely related Melanoplus are in North America.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 83 , Issue 9 , September 1951 , pp. 213 - 230
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1951

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blanchard, E. E. 1933. Parasitos animales de la langosta. Bol. Mens. Min. Agr. Arg. 34, pp. 247–66.Google Scholar
Blanchard, E. E. 1939. Los sarcofagidos argentinos. Contribucion a su conocimiento. Rev. Arg. Soc. Sci. Nat. 17, pp. 791–856.Google Scholar
Blanchard, E. E. 1942. Los sarcofagidos argentinos. Secunda contribucion a su conocimiento. Rev. Soc. Arg. Sci. Nat. 19, pp. 133–72.Google Scholar
Blanchard, E. E. 1942. Nuevos Dipteros y Himenopteros parasitos de la Republica Argentina. Rev. Soc. Ent. Arg. 11, no. 4, pp. 340–79.Google Scholar
Blanchard, E. E. 1943. Un nuevo Dexiido, Ceracia subandina, parasito de la tucura Dichroplus arrogans Stal. Rev. Soc. Ent. Arg. 12, no. 1, pp. 19–21.Google Scholar
Blanchard, E. E. 1951. Primera lista anotada de Ostromuscarios entomofagos argentinos. In press 1951.Google Scholar
Buckell, E. R. and Spencer, G. J.. 1945. A preliminary list of the flesh flies of British Columbia (Diptera, Sarcophagidae) Proc. Ent. Soc. B. C. 42, p. 6.Google Scholar
Crouzel, I. Santoro de and Sakvin, R. G.. 1943. Contribucion al estudio de los Neorhynchocephalus argentinos (Diptera, Nemestrinidae) Ann. Soc. Ciencias Arg. E. IV, vol. 76, pp. 145–77.Google Scholar
Drake, C. J. and Richardson, C. H.. 1940. La lucha contra la tucura en la Republica Argentina. Soc. Rural Arg. Bol. 9.Google Scholar
Lahille, F. 1907. La langosta y sus moscas parasitarias. Ann. Min. Agr. Arg. 3, no. 4, pp. 136.Google Scholar
Liebermann, J. 1939. Catalogo sistematico y biogeografico de Acridoideos argentinos. Rev. Soc. Ent. Arg. 10, no. 2, pp. 125–230.Google Scholar
Liebermann, J. 1939. Los acrideos de Mendoza, con observaciones acerca de su ecologia y su distribucion. Mem. Com. Cen. Inv. Langosta, Min. Agr. Arg. 1936 (1939) pp. 259–89.Google Scholar
Liebermann, J. 1941. Contribucion a la zoogeografia, taxonomia, y ecologia de los acridoideos de Entre Rios. Min. Hac. Just. e Inst. Pub. de Entre Rios., pp. 1–50.Google Scholar
Liebermann, J. 1942. Los acrideos de San Luis. Bol. Agr. de Mendoza, nos. 10, 11, 12, pp. 1–36.Google Scholar
Liebermann, J. 1942. Lista definitiva de los acridoideos de Chile. Bol. San. Veg. Chile. 2. no. 2, pp. 133–39.Google Scholar
Liebermann, J. 1945. Noticia preliminar sobre los acridoideos de la Patagonia. Ann. Mus. de la Patagonia, 1, pp. 185–94.Google Scholar
Liebermann, J. and Schiuma, R.. 1946. Las tucuras mas perjudiciales de nuestra agricultura y ganaderia. Inst. San. Veg. Min. Agr. Arg. ser. B, no. 7.Google Scholar
Liebermann, J. and Ruffinelli, A.. 1946. Catalogo de acridoideos uruguayos. Rev. Ass. Ings. Agr. Ur. 76, pp. 9–21.Google Scholar
Ogloblin, A. A. 1949. Private communication.Google Scholar
Ruffinelli, A. and Carbonell, C. S.. 1944. Primera lista sistematica de insectos relacionados con la agricultura nacional. Rev. Ass. Ings. Agr. Ur. 16, no. 1, pp. 13–22.Google Scholar
Salavin, R. G. 1949. Private communication.Google Scholar
Schiuma, R. 1938. Informe sobre tucuras. Min. Agr. Arg. Pub. mis. no. 43.Google Scholar
Smith, R. W. 1940. An exchange of grasshopper parasites between Argentina and Canada, with notes on parasitism of native grasshoppers. Rep. Ent. Soc. Ont. 70, pp. 57–62.Google Scholar
Smith, R. W. 1944. Observations on parasites of some Canadian grasshoppers. Con. Ent. 76, no. 2, pp. 28–33.Google Scholar
Smith, R. W. and Finlayson, T. U.. 1950. Larvae of dipterous parasites of nymphal and adult grasshoppers. Can. J. Res. 28, pp. 80–117.Google Scholar
Stuardo, Ortiz Carlos. 1946. Cacalogo de los dipteros de Chile. Min. Agr. Chile. Santiago.Google Scholar
Taylor, Griffich. 1950. Canada. 526 pp. E. P. Dutron & Co, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
Townsend, C. H. T. 1933–1942. Manual of myiology. Vols. 1–12, Sao Paulo.Google Scholar
Trujillo, Peluffo. A. 1942. Insectos y otros parasitos de la Agricultura y sus productos en el Uruguay. Fac. de Agron, Ens. Exten. Muntevideo.Google Scholar
Wood, A. H. 1933. Notes on some dipterous parasites of Schistocerca and Locusta in the Sudan. Bul. Ent. Res. 24, pt. 4, pp. 521–30.Google Scholar