Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T22:41:19.590Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Species of Lygus, Liocoris, and Their Allies in the Prairie Provinces of Canada (Hemiptera: Miridae)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Leonard A. Kelton
Leonard A. Kelton
Affiliation:
Systematic Entomology Unit, Entomology Division, Ottawa, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Lygus complex was treated as a number of genera and subgenera in a recent paper (Kelton, 1955). The genus Liocoris Fieber now contains the economically important species, the pratensis group, referred to collectively in the literature as the “lygus” bugs.

In the Prairie Provinces of Canada, several species of the pratensis group are of economic importance mainly in the growing of alfalfa seed, especially in the north-central agricultural region and in the irrigated areas of the southwest. A review of the names used in dealing with these pests on the Canadian prairies showed that most of them were based on misidentifications, although fortunately the use of the names has been fairly consistent. Such widely recorded and used names of Lygus pratensis (L.) and L. elisus Van D. have each been used for specimens of another species, and L. hesperus Kngt. for those of three other species.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 87 , Issue 12 , December 1955 , pp. 531 - 556
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bolton, J. L., and Peck, O.. 1946. Alfalfa seed production in northern Saskatchewan as affected by lygus bugs, with a report on their control by burning. Sci. Agri. 26: 130–137.Google Scholar
Fallen, C. F. 1829. Hemiptera Sueciae. London.Google Scholar
Fieber, F. X. 1861. Die europäischen Hemiptera. (Rhynchota Heteroptera) Wien.Google Scholar
Kelton, L. A. 1955. Genera and subgenera of the Lygus complex (Hemiptera: Miridae). Canadian Ent. 87: 277–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelton, L. A. 1955. New species of Liocoris from North America (Hemiptera: Miridae). Canadian Ent. 87: 484–490.Google Scholar
Knight, H. H. 1916. Remarks on Lygus invitus Say, with descriptions of new species and variety of Lygus (Hemiptera: Miridae). Canadian Ent. 48: 345–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, H. H. 1917. A revision of the genus Lygus as it occurs in America north of Mexico, with biological data on the species from New York. New York (Cornell) Univ. Agri. Expt. Sta. Bull. 391: 555–645.Google Scholar
Knight, H. H. 1921. Distribution and notes on Alaskan Miridae. Ohio J. Sci. 21: 107–109.Google Scholar
Knight, H. H. 1923. The Miridae (or Capsidae) of Connecticut. Connecticut Geol. & Nat. Hist. Survey Bull. 34: 422–658.Google Scholar
Knight, H. H. 1925. List of Miridae and Anthocoridae from Alberta, Canada (Hemiptera). Canadian Ent. 57: 181–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, H. H. 1927. Notes on the distribution and host plants of some North American Miridae (Hemiptera). Canadian Ent. 59: 34–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, H. H. 1941. New species of Lygus from western United States (Hemiptera, Miridae). Iowa State Coll. J. Sci. 15: 269–273.Google Scholar
Knight, H. H. 1941. The plant bugs, or Miridae, of Illinois. Illinois Nat. Hist. Survey Bull. 22.Google Scholar
Knight, H. H. 1944. Lygus Hahn; six new species from western North America (Hemiptera, Miridae). Iowa State Coll. J. Sci. 18: 471–477.Google Scholar
Knight, H. H. 1953. New species of Miridae from Missouri (Hemiptera). Iowa State Coll. J. Sci. 27: 509–518.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. 1758. Systema naturae.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. 1761. Fauna Suecica.Google Scholar
Moore, T. E. 1955. A new species of Agnocoris from Illinois, and a synopsis of the genus in North America (Hemiptera, Miridae). Proc. Ent. Soc. Washington 57: 175–180.Google Scholar
McGregor, E. A. 1927. Lygus elisus: A pest of the cotton regions in Arizona and California. U.S. Dept. Agr. Tech. Bull. 4.Google Scholar
Palisot de Beauvais, A. M. F. J. 1805. Insects récueillis en Afrique et en Amrique dans les royaumes d'Oware, à Saint-Dominique dans les États-Unis, pendant les années 1781–1797. Paris.Google Scholar
Reuter, O. M. 1875. Hemipteres nouveaux. Pet. nouv. ent. 136: 544–545.Google Scholar
Reuter, O. M. 1876. Capsinae ex America boreali in Museo Holmiensi asservatae. Ofvers. Kongl. vet. Akad. Förhandl. 32: 59–92.Google Scholar
Reuter, O.M. 1879. Till en djurgeografisk fråga, ett litet bidrag. Öfvers. Finska vet. Soc. Förhandl. 21: 64–82. (pp. 35–53 in separate).Google Scholar
Reuter, O. M. 1896. Hemiptera gymnocerata Europae. In Acta Soc. Sci. Fennicae, pp. 1–392. Helsingfors.Google Scholar
Salt, R. W. 1945. Number of generations of Lygus hesperus Knt. and L. elisus Van D. in Alberta. Sci. Agr. 25: 573–576.Google Scholar
Shull, W. E. 1933. An investigation of the Lygus species which are pests of beans (Hemiptera, Miridae). Univ. Idaho Agr. Expt. Sta. Res. Bull. 11.Google Scholar
Slater, J. A. 1950. An investigation of the female genitalia as taxonomic characters in the Miridae (Hemiptera). Iowa State Coll. J. Sci. 25: 1–81.Google Scholar
Slater, J. A., and Davis, N. T., 1952. The scientific name of the tarnished plant bug (Hemiptera, Miridae). Proc. Ent. Soc. Washington 54: 194–198.Google Scholar
Sorenson, C. J. 1939. Lygus bugs in relation to alfalfa seed production. Utah Agr. Expt. Sta. Bull. 284.Google Scholar
Stål, C. 1858. Beitrag zur Hemiptera — Fauna Sibiriens und des russischen Nord-Amerika. Stett. Ent. Zeit. 19: 175–198.Google Scholar
Stitt, L. L. 1940. Three species of the genus Lygus and their relation to alfalfa seed production in southern Arizona and California. U.S. Dept. Agr. Tech. Bull. 741.Google Scholar
Uhler, P. R. 1877. Report upon the insects collected by P. R. Uhler during the explorations of 1875, including monographs of the Cydnidae and Saldidae, and the Hemiptera collected by A. S. Packard, Jr., M.D. U.S. Geol. Geogr. Surv. Bull. 2: 355–475.Google Scholar
Uhler, P. R. 1892. Observations on some remarkable Heteroptera of North America. Maryland Acad. Sci. Trans. 1892: 179–184.Google Scholar
Uhler, P. R. 1895. Descriptions of new species. In Colorado Agr. Expt. Sta. Bull. 31: 1–137.Google Scholar
Van Duzee, E. P. 1914. A preliminary list of the Hemiptera of San Diego County, California. San Diego Soc. Nat. Hist. Trans. 2: 1–57.Google Scholar
Van Duzee, E. P. 1916. Check list of the Hemiptera (excepting) the Aphididae, Aleurodidae, and Coccidae) of America North of Mexico. New York, 1916.Google Scholar
Wagner, E. 1940. Zur Systematik von Lygus pratensis L. (Hem., Heteropt. Miridae). Verh. ver. naturw. Heimat. Hamburg 28: 149–154.Google Scholar
Wagner, E. 1947. Lygus rutilans Horv. (Heimpt., Heteropt.). Mitt, naturw. Ver. Steiemark 76: 74–77.Google Scholar
Wagner, E. 1949. Zur Systematik der Gattung Lygus Hhn. (Hem. Het. Miridae). Verh. Ver. naturw. Heimatf. Hamburg 30: 26–40.Google Scholar
Wagner, E. 1950. Die Artberechtigung von Lygus maritimus Wagn. (Hem. Het. Miridae). Ent. Ber. Amsterdam 13: 87–90.Google Scholar
Wagner, E., and Slater, J. A., 1952. Concerning some Holarctic Miridae (Hemiptera, Heteroptera). Proc. Ent. Soc. Washington 54: 273–281.Google Scholar
Walker, F. 1873. Catalogue of the specimens of Hemiptera Heteroptera in the collection of the British Museum. London, 1873.Google Scholar