Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T21:27:13.796Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

SOLUTION SEPARATION AND MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD DENSITY ESTIMATES OF HEMLOCK LOOPER (LEPIDOPTERA: GEOMETRIDAE) EGGS IN MOSS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

R. F. Shepherd
Affiliation:
Pacific Forest Research Centre, Canadian Forestry Service, Victoria, British Columbia
T. G. Gray
Affiliation:
Pacific Forest Research Centre, Canadian Forestry Service, Victoria, British Columbia

Abstract

Counting hemlock looper (Lambditm fiscellaria lugnbrosa) eggs attached to moss samples is tedious and inaccurate. Moss samples treated with a 0.5% NaOH solution for 1 minute releases the eggs, which can be washed and filtered out of the moss. Other debris can be separated through differential flotation with 15% NaCl solution. Three such washings provide data for analysis with the maximum likelihood method, producing density estimates with low-standard errors.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carolin, V. M., Johnson, N. E., Buffam, P. E., and McComb, D.. 1964. Sampling egg populations of western hemlock looper in coastal forests. U.S. Forest Serv. Pacif. NW est. Res. Pap. 14, 13 pp.Google Scholar
Condrashoff, S. F. 1967. An extraction method for rapid counts of insect eggs and small organisms. Can. Ent. 99: 300303.Google Scholar
Hopping, G. R. 1934. An account of the western hemlock looper Ellopia somniaria Hulst. on conifers in British Columbia. Scient. Agric. 15: 1229.Google Scholar
Kinghorn, J. M. 1952. Western hemlock looper egg sampling. Bi-mon. Progr. Rep., Can. Dep. Agric. 8(3): 34.Google Scholar
Miller, C. A. and McDougall, G. A.. 1968. A new sampling techique for spruce budworm larvae. Bi-Mon. Res. Notes, Can. Dep. Fish. For. 24: 3031.Google Scholar
Southwood, T. R. E. 1966. Ecological methods. Methuen, London. 391 pp.Google Scholar
Thomson, M. G. 1958. Egg sampling for thr western hemlock looper. For. Chron. 34: 248256.Google Scholar
Zippin, C. 1956. An evalution of the removal method of estimating animal populations. Biometrics 12: 163189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zippin, C. 1958. The removal method of population estimation. J. Wildl. Mgmt 22: 8290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar