Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T16:55:44.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

SEX PHEROMONE COMPONENTS OF THE OAK LEAF SHREDDER, CROESIA SEMIPURPURANA (LEPIDOPTERA: TORTRICIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

P.J. Silk
Affiliation:
Pheromone Research Group, Chemical and Biotechnical Services, Research and Productivity Council, 921 College Hill Road, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada E3B 6Z9
L.P.S. Kuenen
Affiliation:
Pheromone Research Group, Chemical and Biotechnical Services, Research and Productivity Council, 921 College Hill Road, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada E3B 6Z9
A.R. Alford
Affiliation:
Pheromone Research Group, Chemical and Biotechnical Services, Research and Productivity Council, 921 College Hill Road, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada E3B 6Z9
G.C. Lonergan
Affiliation:
Pheromone Research Group, Chemical and Biotechnical Services, Research and Productivity Council, 921 College Hill Road, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada E3B 6Z9
G.G. Grant
Affiliation:
Pheromone Research Group, Chemical and Biotechnical Services, Research and Productivity Council, 921 College Hill Road, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada E3B 6Z9

Abstract

Using gas chromatography and gas chromatography – mass spectrometry analyses of sex pheromone gland volatiles, we identified E- and Z-11-tetradecenals (E:Z-11-14:Aid) in an 85:15 blend of E:Z as the primary sex pheromone components of Croesia semipurpurana (Kearfott). Similar chemical analyses of sex pheromone gland extracts indicated the presence of the congeneric acetates (85:15 E:Z-11-14:Ac) and their saturated analogue (14:Ac); in addition, 85:15 E:Z-11-14:Alds were present at 5% of the acetates. The E:Z-11-14:Alds alone elicited trap capture; admixtures of saturated and unsaturated acetate analogues exhibited no significant synergistic or inhibitory effects. PVC rods with an 85:15 E:Z-11-14:Ald blend is recommended as a trap bait for monitoring population trends. It is unknown whether or not the components identified here represent the complete pheromone blend of this species; data from traps suspended 1.5 m above the ground versus those suspended 10 m above the ground suggest that future field studies may need to be conducted with traps positioned in the tree canopy.

Résumé

En utilisant la chromatographie en phase gazeuse et des analyses par chromatographie en phase gazeuse – spectometrie demasse des volatiles des phéromones de glandes sexuelles, nous avons identifié le E- et Z-11-tétradécenal (E : Z-11-14 : Ald dans un mélange 85 : 15 E : Z étant le principal constituant des phéromones sexuels Croesia semipurpurana (Kearfott). Des analyses chimiques similaires sur des extraits glandulaires des phéromones sexuels ont indiqué la présence d’acétates congénériques (85 : 15 E : Z-11-14 : Ac) et de leurs analogues saturés (14 : Ac); de plus, le 85 : 15 E : Z-11-14 : Ald représentait 5% des acétates. Le E : Z-11-14 : Ald seul provoque la capture par piègage; des mélanges d’analogues d’acétates saturés et insaturés n’ont démontré aucun effet synergetique ou inhibitoire. Une tige de PVC avec un mélange 85 : 15 E : Z-11-14 : Ald est recommandée comme appât pour pièges afin de suivre l’évolution des populations. À ce moment-ci, il est inconnu si les constituants identifiés représentent le mélange complet des phéromones de cette espèce; des tendances contradictoires à l’analyse des données de piègage entre des pièges suspendues à 1,5 m versus 10 m au dessus du sol suggèrent que de futures études sur le terrain peuvent être requises avec des pièges positionnés dans le couvert des arbres.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arn, H., Toth, M., and Priesner, E.. 1992. List of Sex Pheromones of Lepidoptera and Related Attractants, 2nd ed. IOBC, Montfavet.Google Scholar
Chang, V.C.S. 1995. Trapping Cryptophlebia illepida and C. ombrodelta (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in Macadamia in Hawaii. International Journal of Pest Management 41: 5054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, G.G., Brady, U.E., and Brand, J.M.. 1972. Male armyworm scent brush secretion. Identification and electroantennogram study of major components. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 65: 12241227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, G.G., Frech, D.MacDonald, L., and Doyle, B.. 1981. Effect of additional components on a sex attractant for the oak leaf shredder, Croesia semipurpurana (Lepidoptera:Tortricidae). The Canadian Entomologist 113: 449451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, G.G., Retnakaran, A., and Howse, G.M.. 1995. Oak leaf shredder, Croesia semipurpurana. pp. 149152in Armstrong, J.A., and Ives, W.G.H. (Eds.), Forest Insect Pests in Canada. Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Ottawa.Google Scholar
Howse, G.M., and McDowall, L.L.. 1980. Forest insect and disease conditions in Ontario. Survey Bulletin, Great Lakes Forest Research Centre, 10 pp.Google Scholar
Lonergan, G.C. 1986. Metabolsim of pheromone components and analogs by cuticular enzymes of Choristoneura fumiferana. Journal of Chemical Ecology 12: 483496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lonergan, G.C., Ponder, B.M.Seabrook, W.D., and Kipp, L.R.. 1989. Sex pheromone components of the blueberry leaftier moth Croesia curvalana Kearfott (Lepidoptera:Tortricidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology 15: 24952506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pendrel, B., Doucette, D.E., and Simpson, R.A.. 1995. Pheromone trap monitoring of forest pests in the Maritimes—1994. Canadian Forest Service, Maritimes Region, Technical Note 305.Google Scholar
Retnakaran, A., and Grant, G.G.. 1985. Control of the oak-leaf shredder, Croesia semipurpurana Kearfott (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), by aerial application of diflubenzuron. The Canadian Entomologist 117: 363369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roelofs, W.L. 1977. The scope and limitation of the electroantennogram technique in identifying pheromone components. pp. 147165in McFarlane, N.R. (Ed.), Crop Protection Agents—Their Biological Evaluation. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Silk, P.J., and Kuenen, L.P.S.. 1984. Sex pheromones and their potential as control agents for forest Lepidoptera in Eastern Canada. pp. 3547in Garner, W.Y., and Harvey, K. Jr., (Eds.), Chemical and Biological Controls in Forestry, ACS Symposium Series 238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silk, P.J., and Kuenen, L.P.S.. 1988. Sex pheromones and the behavioral biology of the coniferophagous Choristoneura. Annual Review of Entomology 33: 83101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silk, P.J., Tan, S.H.Wiesner, C.J.Ross, R.J., and Lonergan, G.C.. 1980. Sex pheromone chemistry of the eastern spruce budworm, Choristoreura fumiferana. Environmental Entomology 9: 640644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silk, P.J., Wiesner, C.J.Tan, S.H.Ross, R.J., and Grant, G.G.. 1982. Sex pheromone chemistry of the western spruce budworm Choristoneura occidentalis, Free. Journal of Chemical Ecology 8: 351362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weatherston, J., Grant, G.G.MacDonald, L.M.Frech, D.Werner, R.A.Leznoff, C.C., and Fyles, T.M.. 1978. Attraction of various Tortricine moths to blends containing cis-11-tetradecenal. Journal of Chemical Ecology 4: 453549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiesner, C.J., and Silk, P.J.. 1982. Monitoring the performance of eastern spruce budworm pheromone formulations. pp. 209218. in Leonhardt, B.A., and Beroza, M. (Eds.), Insect Pheromone Technology: Chemistry and Applications. ACS Symposium Series 190.Google Scholar