Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T12:59:30.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

REVIEW OF TULARAEMIA IN BRITISH COLUMBIA, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO A RECENT HUMAN CASE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

T. K. Moilliet
T. K. Moilliet
Affiliation:
Dominion Entomological Laboratory, Kamloops, B. C.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Since its discovery in rodents by McCoy3 in California in 1911, tularaemia has been found to have a widespread distribution in North America. The same year it was described by Pearsd12 as an insect-borne disease. Francis1. in 1919- 1920 correlated these two manifestations and to him we owe most of our knowledge of the disease. It is now known to be contracted by man either by contact with infected animals or by the bites of flies or ticks which have become carriers through biting diseased rodents prior to attacking man, or even from the excreta of these insects.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 68 , Issue 6 , June 1936 , pp. 121 - 124
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1936

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Francis, E.; “Deer Fly Fever: A Disease of Man of Hitherto Unknown Etiology,” U. S. Pub. Health Rep. No. 34, pp. 2061–2062, Sept. 12, 1919. “Tularaemia,” Jr. Amer. Med. Assoc. No. 84 pp. 1243–1250, Apr. 25, 1925.Google Scholar
2.Green, R. G. and E. M., Wade; “Tularaemia in the Cat,” Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. & Med., XXV, pp. 856–857, 1928.Google Scholar
3.McCoy, G. W.; “A Plague-like Disease of Rodtenlts,” U. S. Pub. Health Bul. No. 43, Apr. 1911.Google Scholar
4McNabb, A. L.; “Tularaemia. The First Case Reported in Canada,” Can. Pub. Health J1., Vol. XXI, No. 2, pp. 91–92, Feb. 1930.Google Scholar
5.Ootmar, G. A.; “B. C. Tularaemia Case Report,” B. C. Lab. Bul., Vol. V, No. 1, Jan. 1931.Google Scholar
6Parker, R. R. and E., Francis, “Susceptibility of the Coyote (Canis lestes) to Tularaemiia,” U. S. Pub. Health Ser. Rep., Vol. LXI, pp. 1407–410, July 9, 1926. (Reprint No. 1093).Google Scholar
7.Parker, R. R., C. S., Brooks and H., Marsh; “The Occurence of Bacterium tularense in the Woodtick (Dermacentor occidentalis) in California,” U. S. Pub. Health Rep., Vol. 44, No. 22, pp. 1299–1300, May 31, 1929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Parker, R. R. and J., Dade; “Tularaemia; Its Transmission ito Sheep by the Wood Tick Dermacentor andersoni Stiles,” Jr. Amer. Vet. Med. Assoc., Vol. LXXV, N.S. 28, No. 2, pp. 173–198, Aug. 1929.Google Scholar
9.Parker, R. R., E., Hearle and E. A., Bruce; “Occurrence of Tularaemia in B. C.,” U. S. Pub. Health Ser. Rep., Vol. 46, No. 2, Jan. 9, 1931. (Reprint No. 1441).Google Scholar
10.Parker, R. R.; letter to Dominion Entomological Laboratory, Kamloops, B. C., November 8, 1934.Google Scholar
11.Parker, R. R.; letter to Dominion Entomological Laboratory, Kamloops, B. C., July 9, 1935.Google Scholar
12.Pearse, R. A.; “Insect Bites,” Northwest Medicine, March, 1911.Google Scholar