Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-89wxm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T05:06:42.984Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Review of Studies of Blood-Sucking Flies in Northern Canada1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

C. R. Twinn
C. R. Twinn
Affiliation:
Household and Medical Entomology, Division of Entomology, Ottawa, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Interest in the Canadian north has increased greatly during recent years because of its importance in national defence, and the actual and potential value of its natural resources. A serious hindrance to northern development is the presence during the short summer season of great numbers of blood-sucking flies that make liie difficult for man and beast. The major pem in the forested subarctic are mosquitoes, black flies, and tabanids (the so-called deer flies and moose flies); beyond the tree-line on the arctic tundra black flies are much less troublesome and tabanids do not occur, but in many regions mosquitoes are a terrible scourge.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 84 , Issue 1 , January 1952 , pp. 22 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1952

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnason, A. P., Brown, A. W. A., Fredeen, F. J. H., Hopewell, W. W., and Rempel, J. G.. 1949. Experiments in the control of Simulium arcticum Mall, by means of DDT in the Saskatchewan River. Sci. Agr. 29: 527–537.Google Scholar
Berck, B. Unpublished report. Microdetermination of DDT in river water and silt, 1950. Stored Product Insect Laboratory, Division of Entomology, Winnipeg, Manitoba.Google Scholar
Brown, A. W. A. 1951. Factors in the attractiveness of bodies for mosquitoes. Nature 167 (4240): 202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, A. W. A. In press. Studies of the responses of the female Aedes mosquito. Part IV. Field experiments on Canadian species. Bull. Ent. Res.Google Scholar
Brown, A. W. A., Sarkaria, D. S., and Thompson, R. P.. In press. Studies of the responses of the female Aedes mosquito. Part I. The search for attractant vapours. Bull. Ent. Res.Google Scholar
Brown, A. W. A., Thompson, R. P., Twinn, C. R., and Cutkomp, L. K.. 1951. Control of adult mosquitoes and black flies by DDT sprays applied from aircraft. Mosquito News 11: 75.–84.Google Scholar
[Brown, A. W. A., and Twinn, C. R.] 1950. Large-scale DDT spraying reduces mosquito nuisance. Engineering News-Record 145 (22): 30–32.Google Scholar
Eligh, G. S. 1951. The precipitin test for mosquito blood meal determination. MA. thesis. Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.Google Scholar
Fredeen, F. J. H., Rempel, J. G., and Arnason, A. P.. 1951. Egg-laying habits, overwintering stages, and life-cycle of Simulium arcticum Mall. (Diptera: Simuliidae). Canadian Ent. 83. 73–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, J. B., Husman, C. N., Brown, A. W. A., Wm. McDuffie, C., and Sharp, J. F.. 1949. Exploratory studies on the control of adult mosquitoes and black flies with DDT under arctic conditions. Mosquito News 9: 93–97.Google ScholarPubMed
Hocking, B. 1950. Further tests of insecticides against black flies and a control procedure (Diptera: Simuliidae). Sci. Agr. 30: 489–508.Google Scholar
Hocking, B., and Richards, W. R.. Prepared for publication. The biology and control of Labrador black flies (Diptera: Simuliidae).Google Scholar
Hocking, B., Richards, W. R., and Twinn, C. R.. 1950. Observations on the bionomics of some northern mosquito species (Culicidae: Diptera). Canadian J. Res., D, 28: 58–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hocking, B., Twinn, C. R., and McDuffie, Wm. C.. 1949. A preliminary evaluation of some insecticides against immature stages of black flies (Diptera: Simuliidae). Sci. Agr. 29: 69–80.Google Scholar
Jenkins, D. W., and Hassett, C. C.. 1951. Dispersal and flight range of sub-arctic mosquitoes marked with radiophosphorus. Canadian J. Zool 29: 178–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDuffie, Wm. C., Cross, H. F., Twinn, C. R., Brown, A. W. A., and Husman, C. N.. 1949. The effectiveness of DDT and other insecticides as larvicides against arctic species of Aedes. Mosquito News 9: 145–149.Google ScholarPubMed
McDuffie, Wm. C., Sharp, J. F., Cross, H. F., Twinn, C. R., and Wilson, W. M.. 1949. The effectiveness of prehatching treatments for the control of arctic mosquitoes. Mosquito News 9: 51–56.Google Scholar
Miller, L. A. 1951. Observations on the bionomics of some northern species of Tabanidae (Diptera). Canadian J. Zool. 29: 240–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, D. G. Prepared for publication. Thermal-generated aerosols for adult biting-fly control in Canada.Google Scholar
Peterson, D. G., and Brown, A. W. A.. In press. Studies of the responses of the female Aedes mosquito. Part III. The response of Aedes aegypti to a warm body and its radiation. Bull. Ent. Res.Google Scholar
Sarkaria, D. S., and A. Brown, W. A.. In press. Studies of the responses of the female Aedes mosquito. Part II. The action of liquid repellent compounds. Bull. Ent. Res.Google Scholar
Sharp, J. F. Prepared for publication. Mosquito control by airspray in northern British Columbia and the Yukon.Google Scholar
Twinn, C. R. 1949. Mosquitoes and mosquito control in Canada. Mosquito News 9: 35–41.Google Scholar
Twinn, C. R. 1950. Studies on the biology and control of biting flies in northern Canada. Arctic (J. of the Arctic Inst. of N.A.) 3: 14–26.Google Scholar
Twinn, C. R., Brown, A. W. A., and Hurtig, H.. 1950. Area control of mosquitoes by aircraft in sub-arctic Canada. Proc. 31th Ann. Meet. New Jersey Mosq. Exterm. Assoc., pp. 113–140.Google Scholar
Twinn, C. R., Hocking, B., McDuffie, Wm. C., and Cross, H. F.. 1948. A preliminary account of the biting flies at Churchill, Manitoba. Canadian J. Res., D, 26: 334–357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
West, A. S. 1950. The precipitin test as an entomological tool. Canadian Ent. 82: 241–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar