Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-lrf7s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T01:59:11.112Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

POPULATION DYNAMICS OF SEPEDON FUSCIPENNIS (DIPTERA: SCIOMYZIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

James W. Eckblad  and
Clifford O. Berg
James W. Eckblad
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
Clifford O. Berg
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Adults of Sepedon fuscipennis Loew were sampled periodically throughout the summers of 1969 and 1970 in a backwater habitat. Several overlapping generations of this common marsh fly were present during both summers, and its population density reached a unimodal peak both years. Population estimates based on mean number per sweep agreed well with mark–release–recapture data. These estimates showed a reasonably good fit to the negative binomial distribution and indicated that aggregation of the flies probably is due to some heterogeneity in the environment. Flies lived more than 3 months in laboratory cages, and each female laid an average of 191 eggs.

Estimates were made of larval survival and net production for discrete cohorts followed in the field. The survival and production rates of larvae were greater when small snails were abundant in the habitat and much greater when the larvae were fed once before being released. Survival was not decreased perceptibly by the degree of larval crowding tested (50 larvae compared with 25 in an area of 254.34 cm2).

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 104 , Issue 11 , November 1972 , pp. 1735 - 1742
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, K. R. 1951. The Horokiwi stream: a study of a trout population. Fish. Bull. N.Z., No. 10. 231 pp.Google Scholar
Bailey, N. T. J. 1951. On estimating the size of mobile populations from recapture data. Biometrika 38: 293–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, N. T. J. 1952. Improvements in the interpretation of recapture data. J. Anim. Ecol. 21: 120–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beall, G. 1935. Study of arthropod populations by the method of sweeping. Ecology 16: 216–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaver, O. 1970 (unpub.). Studies on the ecological relationships of certain sciomyzid flies. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. College of North Wales, Bangor. 240 pp.Google Scholar
Berg, C. O. 1953. Sciomyzid larvae (Diptera) that feed on snails. J. Parasit. 39: 630–636.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeLong, D. M. 1932. Some problems encountered in the estimation of insect populations by the sweeping method. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 25: 13–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckblad, J. W. 1971 (unpub.). The population ecology of malacophagous larvae of Sepedon fuscipennis (Diptera: Sciomyzidae) and three aquatic snail populations (Lymnaea palustris; Physa integra; Gyraulus parvus). Ph.D. Thesis, Cornell University. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor, Mich. (Order No. 72–9924). 108 pp.Google Scholar
Geckler, P. R. 1971. Laboratory studies of predation of snails by larvae of the marsh fly, Sepedon tenuicornis (Diptera: Sciomyzidae). Can. Ent. 103: 638–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jolly, G. M. 1963. Estimates of population parameters from multiple recapture data with both death and dilution — a deterministic model. Biometrika 50: 113–128.Google Scholar
Neess, J. and Dugdale, R. C.. 1959. Computation of production of populations of aquatic midge larvae. Ecology 40: 425–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neff, S. E. and Berg, C. O.. 1966. Biology and immature stages of malacophagous Diptera of the genus Sepedon (Sciomyzidae). Bull. Va agric. Exp. Stn 566. 113 pp.Google Scholar
Southwood, T. R. E. 1966. Ecological methods with particular reference to the study of insect populations. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Torii, T. 1956. The stochastic approach in field population ecology with special reference to field insect populations. Japan Soc. for Promotion of Science, Ueno, Tokyo.Google Scholar
Trpis, M. and Shemanchuk, J. A.. 1970. Effect of constant temperature on the larval development of Aedes vexans (Diptera: Culicidae). Can. Ent. 102: 1048–1051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waters, W. E. 1959. A quantitative measure of aggregation in insects. J. econ. Ent. 52: 1180–1184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar