Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-txr5j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T01:38:10.420Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the Identity of the Gunthorp Types, Part II, and Some Notes on Plectrotaxic Criteria (Chilopoda: Lithobiomorpha: Lithobiidae)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Extract

In 1913 Horace Gunthorp described a new Kansan lithobiid, Lithobius kansensis (4, p. 166), which he compared with what he took to be a closely related species, cantabrigensis Meinert (5, p. 177). Although the new species was inadequately characterized, it is still possible to say that it is undoubtedly referrable to Tidabius, a group proposed by R. V. Chamberlin in November of the same year (2, p. 80).

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

(1)Chamberlin, R. V. 1909. Some records of North American Geophilidae and Lithobiidae with descriptions of new species. Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer., II, pp. 175195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Chamberlin, R. V. 1913. The lithobiid genera Nampabius, Garibius, Tidabius, and Sigibius. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. Harvard, LVII(2), pp. 39104.Google Scholar
(3)Crabill, R. E. Jr. 1952. A new cavernicolous Nampabius with a key to its northeastern North American congeners. Ent. News, LXIII (8), pp. 203206.Google Scholar
(4)Gunthorp, H. 1913. An annotated list of the Diplopoda and Chilopoda, with a key to the Myriapoda of Kansas. Kans. Univ. Sci. Bull., VII (6), pp. 161182.Google Scholar
(5)Meinert, Fr. 1886. Myriapoda Musei Cantabrigensis, I Chilopoda. Proc. Amer. Phil. Soc., XXIII, pp. 161233.Google Scholar
(6)Ribaut, H. 1921. L'armement des pattes chez les Lithobies. Soc. D'Hist. Nat. Toulouse, XLIX, pp. 312319.Google Scholar