Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T22:56:50.066Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

NEW HOSTS, DISTRIBUTION, AND BIOLOGICAL NOTES ON AN IMPORTED AMBROSIA BEETLE, XYLOSANDRUS GERMANUS (COLEOPTERA: SCOLYTIDAE)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Isolde Schneider  and
Maurice H. Farrier
Isolde Schneider
Affiliation:
Bundesforschungsanstalt für Forst-und Holzwirtschaft, Reinbek, Germany
Maurice H. Farrier
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

New hosts of an introduced Oriental ambrosia beetle were tupelo (Nyssa aquatica), swamp cypress (Taxodium distichum), and black cherry (Prunus serotina). Known distribution was extended southward into North Carolina. A partial seasonal development with simple through complex gallery systems was observed.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 101 , Issue 4 , April 1969 , pp. 412 - 415
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Batra, L. R. 1963. Ecology of ambrosia fungi and their dissemination by beetles. Trans. Kans. Acad. Sci. 66: 213–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, W. D. 1941. Experiments with an ambrosia beetle, Xylosandrus germanus (Bldf.). J. econ. Ent. 34: 367–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, C. W. 1941. Studies of elm insects associated with Dutch elm disease fungus. J. econ. Ent. 34: 369–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craighead, F. C. 1950. Insect enemies of eastern forests. Misc. Publs U.S. Dep. Agric., No. 657.Google Scholar
Felt, E. P. 1932. A new pest in greenhouse grown grape stems. J. econ. Ent. 25: 418.Google Scholar
Francke-Grosmann, H. 1956. Hautdruesen als Traeger der Pilzsymbiose bei Ambrosiakaefern. Z. Morph. Oekol. Tiere 45: 275–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groschke, H. 1952. Der “schwarze Nutzholzborkenkaefer”, Xylosandrus germanus Blandf. ein neuer Schaedling in Deutschland. Z. angew. Ent. 34: 297–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groschke, H.. 1953. Der “schwarze Nutzholzborkenkaefer”, eine neue Gefahr fuer Forstwirtschaft, Obst- und Weinbau. Anz. Schädlingsk. 26: 81–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidenreich, E. 1960. Primaerbefall durch Xylosandrus germanus an Jungeichen. Anz. Schädlingsk. 33: 5–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffrnann, C. H. 1940. Additions to annotated lists of insects reared from elm bark and wood. Bull. Brooklyn ent. Soc. 35: 54–63.Google Scholar
Hoffrnann, C. H.. 1941. Biological observations on Xylosandrus germanus (Bldf.). J. econ. Ent. 34: 38–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inouye, M. 1955. Wichtige, in Hokkaido, Japan, durch schaedliche Forstinsekten verursachte Problem. Anz. Schädlingsk. 28: 161–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, T. H., and Moses, C. S.. 1943. Isolation of Ceratostomella ulmi from insects attracted to felled elm trees. J. agric. Res. 66: 77–85.Google Scholar
Ueno, H. 1960. On the bionomics and comrol of the woodboring beetles (Ipidae, Coleoptera) attacking persimmon in Japan. Jap. J. appl. Ent. Zool. 4: 166–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(In Japanese.) (Abst. In Rev. appl. Ent. 50: 450 (1962).)Google Scholar
Wichrnann, H. 1955. Zur derzeitigen Verbreitung des Japanischen Nutzholzborkenkaefers Xylosandrus germanus Blandf. im Bundesgebiet. Z. angew. Ent. 37: 250–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar