Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-tdptf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-14T23:45:12.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Laboratory and Field Investigations of the Effect of Temperature on the Development of Neodiprion sertifer (Geoff.) in the Cocoon1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

D. R. Wallace  and
C. R. Sullivan
D. R. Wallace
Affiliation:
Forest Insect Laboratory, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario
C. R. Sullivan
Affiliation:
Forest Insect Laboratory, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Laboratory studies show that diapause, or eonymphal development, has a temperature optimum approximating 8 °C, at which some 29 days are required for its completion. The optimum for morphogenesis is 22 °C. About 33 and 37 days for females and males, respectively, are required for its completion.

Field data for three sites with mean temperatures near 22, 19, and 16 °C. show that emergence took place earliest at the intermediate site and latest at the exposed site, which experienced the highest mean temperature. Emergence of males and females overlapped, but at the shaded site, having the lowest mean temperature, females emerged sooner than males, whereas the reverse was observed at the exposed site.

The length of the eonymphal stage in the field is dependent upon site temperature and can be predicted from laboratory data. The duration of the pronymphal stage is dependent not only upon site temperature, but also upon the length of time which has been required for eonymphal development. Thus the longer the eonymphal period. the shorter the pronymphal period. This compensatory mechanism is probably due to a temperature effect on any morphogenesis that takes place concurrently with diapause.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 95 , Issue 10 , October 1963 , pp. 1051 - 1066
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Breny, R. 1957. Contribution à l'étude de la diapause chez Neodiprion sertifer Geoffr. dans la nature. Mem. Acad. roy. Belgique, Cl. Sci. 30: 1–86.Google Scholar
Brown, A. W. A., and Daviault, L.. 1942. A comparative study of the influence of temperature on the development of certain sawflies after hibernation in the cocoon. Sci. Agric. 22: 298–306.Google Scholar
Elens, A. A. 1953. Étude ecologique des lophyres en Campine (Belgique). III. Development du 'stade cocon' et adaptation à la temperature des lophyres Diprion pini L., Diprion pallidum Kl., et Diprion sertifer Geoffr. (Hymenoptera Symphita). Opera Collecta 1: 79–91.Google Scholar
Eliescu, G. 1932. Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Morphologie, Anatomie und Biologie von Lophyrus pini. Z. angew. Entomol. 19: 188–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, J. 1926. Chemische Untersuchungen uber die Metamorphose der Insekten. III. Uber die “subitane” und “latente” Entwicklung. Biochem. Zeitschr., 169: 208–234.Google Scholar
Lyons, L. A., and Griffiths, K. J.. 1962. Observations on the development of Neodiprion sertifer (Geoff.) within the cocoon. Canad. Ent. 94: 994–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, S., and Brown, A. W. A.. 1952. Cytochrome oxidase and cyanide sensitivity of the larch sawfly during metamorphosis. Ann. Rept., Ent. Soc. Ont. 83: 30–34.Google Scholar
Prebble, M. L. 1941. The diapause and related phenomena in Gilpinia polytoma (Hartig). V. Diapause in relation to epidemiology. Canad. J. Res. D. 19: 437–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slama, K. 1958. The total metabolism of insects – VIII. The respiratory metabolism of the prepupal stages and pupae in sawflies. Acta Soc. Zool. Bohemosloven 22: 334–346.Google Scholar
Slama, K. 1960. Metabolism during diapause and development in sawfly metamorphosis. In The Ontogeny of Insects. Acta symposii de evolutione insectorum, Prague 1959. Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, Prague, 1960. pp. 195–201.Google Scholar