Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T13:35:22.159Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of Plants other than the Food Plants of their Host on Host-Finding by Tachinid Parasites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

L. G. Monteith
Affiliation:
Entomology Research Institute for Biological Control, Research Branch, Canada Department of Agriculture, Belleville, Ontario

Extract

Earlier work indicated that food plants of the tenthredinid sawflies attacked by Drino bohemica Mesn. and Bessa harveyi Tns. influence host-finding by these tachinid parasites (Monteith, 1955, 1958a). There is a high degree of interaction between stimuli produced by the host larvae and by their food plants (Monteith, 1955, 1958b).

It was observed during field studies that the percentage parastism by B. harveyi of the larch sawfly, Pristiphora erichsonii (Htg.), varied with increasing height above the ground and in different sections of tamarack trees, Larix larician (DuRoi) K. Koch, on which the sawfly larvae were feeding. It appeared that shrubs and trees other than L. laricina influenced host-finding by B. harveyi.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, W. A., and Jones, L. G.. 1934. Studies of Exeristes roborator (Fab.) a parasite of the European corn borer in the Lake Erie area. United States Dept. Agr. Bull. 460: 125.Google Scholar
Bellamy, R. E., and Reeves, W. C.. 1952. A portable mosquito bait trap. Mosquito News 12: 256258.Google Scholar
Ficht, G. A., and Hienton, T. E.. 1941. Some of the more important factors governing the flight of European corn borer moths to electric traps. J. Econ. Ent. 34: 599604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost, S. W. 1958. Insects attracted to light traps placed at different heights, J. Econ. Ent. 51: 550551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, G. W., and deFreitas, A. S.. 1955. Frass-drop studies of larvae of Neodiprion americanus banksiana Roh. and N. lecontei (Fitch) (Hymenoptera: Diprionidae). Canadian Ent. 87: 427440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herms, W. B. 1947. Some problems in the use of artificial light in crop protection. Hilgardia 17: 359375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacAloney, H. J. 1932. The white-pine weevil. United States Dept. Agr. Circ. 221.Google Scholar
McLeod, J. H. 1951. Notes on the lodgepole needle miner Recurvaria milleri Busck (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), and its parasites in western North America. Canadian Ent. 83: 295301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monteith, L. G. 1955. Host preferences of Drino bohemfca Mesn. (Diptera: Tachinidae), with particular reference to olfactory responses. Canadian Ent. 87: 509530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monteith, L. G. 1958a. influence of food plant of host on attractiveness of the host to tachinid parasites with notes on preimaginal conditioning. Canadian Ent. 90: 478482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monteith, L. G. 1958b. Influence of host and its food plant on host-finding by Drino bohemica Mesn. (Diptera: Tachinidae) and interaction of other factors. Proc. Tenth Intern. Congr. of Ent. 2: 603606.Google Scholar
Richards, O. W. 1940. Biology of the small white butterfly Pieris rapae with special reference to the factors controlling its abundance. J. Animal Ecol. 9: 243288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, R. A. 1933. Activity of blowflies and associated insects at various heights above the ground. Ecology 14: 306314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar