Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-17T02:40:22.663Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Genetically-based resistance of balsam fir (Pinaceae) to damage from the balsam twig aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2016

Sara Edwards*
Affiliation:
Population Ecology Group, Faculty of Forestry and Environmental Management, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, E3B 5A3, Canada
Linley K. Jesson
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, E3B 5A3, Canada
Dan Quiring
Affiliation:
Population Ecology Group, Faculty of Forestry and Environmental Management, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, E3B 5A3, Canada
Yuhui Weng
Affiliation:
New Brunswick Department of Natural Resources, Kingsclear Forestry Nursery, Island View, New Brunswick, E3E 1G3, Canada
Rob Johns
Affiliation:
Population Ecology Group, Faculty of Forestry and Environmental Management, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, E3B 5A3, Canada Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Atlantic Forestry Centre, Fredericton, New Brunswick, E3B 5P7, Canada
Yill Sung Park
Affiliation:
Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Canadian Wood Fiber Centre, Fredericton, New Brunswick, E3G 5P7, Canada
*
1Corresponding author (e-mail: sara.edwards@unb.ca).

Abstract

We evaluated the effect of tree genotype on the resistance of balsam fir, Abies balsamea (Linnaeus) Miller (Pinaceae), to damage from the balsam twig aphid, Mindarus abietinus Koch (Hemiptera: Aphididae), by visually assessing aphid damage in clonal seed orchards located in New Brunswick and Nova Scotia, Canada, during four consecutive years. Estimates of clone mean heritability were moderate, suggesting that heritability of resistance is influenced by genetic factors. In New Brunswick, positive phenotypic and genetic correlations of clone-mean damage among years indicate that clones rank similarly each year. Our results suggest that selectively breeding for increased resistance could result in genetic gains.

Type
Physiology, Biochemistry, Development, and Genetics
Copyright
© Entomological Society of Canada 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Subject editor: Jon Sweeney

References

Alfaro, R.I., Borden, J.H., King, J.N., Tomlin, E.S., McIntosh, R.L., and Bohlmann, J. 2002. Mechanisms of resistance in conifers against shoot infesting insects. In Mechanisms and deployment of resistance in trees to insects. Edited by M. Wagner, K. Clancy, F. Lieutier, and T. Paine. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. Pp. 105130.Google Scholar
Bains, B., Isik, F., Strong, W.B., Jaquish, B., McLean, J.A., and El-Kassaby, Y.A. 2009. Genetic resistance of spruce to gall-forming adelgids (Hemiptera: Adelgidae). Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 39: 25362541.Google Scholar
Bakuzis, E.V. and Hansen, H.L. 1965. Balsam fir: a monographic review. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.Google Scholar
Boege, K. and Marquis, R.J. 2005. Facing herbivory as you grow up: the ontogeny of resistance in plants. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20: 441448.Google Scholar
Browne, W.J., Subramanian, S.V., Jones, K., and Goldstein, H. 2005. Variance partitioning in multilevel logistic models that exhibit overdispersion. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 168: 599613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burdon, R.D. 1977. Genetic correlation as a concept for studying genotype-environment interaction in forest tree breeding. Environments (E), 100: 168175.Google Scholar
Charmantier, A., Perrins, C., McCleery, R.H., and Sheldon, B.C. 2006. Age-dependent genetic variance in a life-history trait in the mute swan. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 273: 225232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chastagner, G.A. and Benson, D.M. 2000. The Christmas tree: traditions, production, and diseases [online]. Plant Health Progress, doi:10.1094/PHP-2000-1013-01-RV. Available from http://www.plantmanagementnetwork.org/pub/php/review/1225tree [accessed 1 October 2015].Google Scholar
DeHayes, D.H. 1981. Genetic variation in susceptibility of Abies balsamea to Mindarus abietinus . Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 11: 3035.Google Scholar
Falconer, D.S. and Mackay, T.F. 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics, 4th edition. Longman Group. London, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Ferrell, G.T. 1989. Differential susceptibility of white fir provenances to balsam twig aphid. Research Note PSW-403. Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Berkeley, California, United States of America.Google Scholar
Fondren, K.M. and McCullough, D.G. 2003. Phenology and density of balsam twig aphid, Mindarus abietinus Koch (Homoptera: Aphididae) in relation to bud break, shoot damage, and value of fir Christmas trees. Journal of Economic Entomology, 96: 17601769.Google Scholar
Fritz, R.S. 1990. Effects of genetic and environmental variation on resistance of willow to sawflies. Oecologia, 82: 325332.Google Scholar
Hadfield, J.D. 2010. MCMC methods for multi-response generalized linear mixed models: the MCMCglmm R package. Journal of Statistical Software, 33: 122.Google Scholar
Hanover, J.W. 1975. Physiology of tree resistance to insects. Annual Review of Entomology, 20: 7595.Google Scholar
Jensen, J.S., Harding, S., and Roulund, H. 1997. Resistance to the green spruce aphid (Elatobium abietinum Walker) in progenies of Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis (Bong) Carr.). Forest Ecology and Management, 97: 207214.Google Scholar
Kaloshian, I., Kinsey, M.G., Ullman, D.E., and Williamson, V.M. 1997. The impact of Meu1‐mediated resistance in tomato on longevity, fecundity and behaviour of the potato aphid, Macrosiphum euphorbiae . Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 83: 181187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, G.G. and Kishaba, A.N. 1977. Response of alate melon aphids to resistant and susceptible muskmelon lines. Journal of Economic Entomology, 70: 407410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, J.N., Yanchuk, A.D., Kiss, G.K., and Alfaro, R.I. 1997. Genetic and phenotypic relationships between weevil (Pissodes strobi) resistance and height growth in spruce populations of British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 27: 732739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kishaba, A.N. and Manglitz, G.R. 1965. Non-preference as a mechanism of sweetclover and alfalfa resistance to the sweetclover aphid and the spotted alfalfa aphid. Journal of Economic Entomology, 58: 566569.Google Scholar
Larson, K.C. and Whitham, T.G. 1997. Competition between gall aphids and natural plant sinks: plant architecture affects resistance to galling. Oecologia, 109: 575582.Google Scholar
Larsson, S. 2002. Resistance in trees to insects – an overview of mechanisms and interactions. In Mechanisms and deployment of resistance in trees to insects. Edited by M. Wagner, K. Clancy, F. Lieutier, and T. Paine. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. Pp. 129.Google Scholar
Leinekugel le Cocq, T.L., Quiring, D., Verrez, A., and Park, Y.S. 2005. Genetically based resistance of black spruce Picea mariana to the yellowheaded spruce sawfly (Pikonema alaskensis). Forest Ecology and Management, 215: 8490.Google Scholar
Maxwell, F.G., Jenkins, J.N., and Parrott, W.L. 1972. Resistance of plants to insects. Advances in Agronomy, 24: 187265.Google Scholar
Mousseau, T.A. and Roff, D.A. 1987. Natural selection and the heritability of fitness components. Heredity, 59: 181197.Google Scholar
Nakagawa, S. and Schielzeth, H. 2010. Repeatability for Gaussian and non‐Gaussian data: a practical guide for biologists. Biological Reviews, 85: 935956.Google Scholar
Nettleton, W.A. and Hain, F.P. 1982. The life history, foliage damage, and control of the balsam twig aphid, Mindarus abietinus (Homoptera: Aphididae), in Fraser fir Christmas tree plantations of western North Carolina. The Canadian Entomologist, 114: 155165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, U.B., Kirkeby-Thomsen, A., and Roulund, H. 2002. Genetic variation in resistance to Dreyfusia nordmannianae Eckst. infestations in Abies nordmanniana (Stev.) Spach. Forest Ecology and Management, 165: 271283.Google Scholar
Pothier, D. 2002. Twenty-year results of precommercial thinning in a balsam fir stand. Forest Ecology and Management, 168: 177186.Google Scholar
Price, T. and Schluter, D. 1991. On the low heritability of life-history traits. Evolution, 45: 853861.Google Scholar
Quiring, D., Turgeon, J., Simpson, D., and Smith, A. 1991. Genetically based differences in susceptibility of white spruce to the spruce bud moth. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 21: 4247.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team. 2014. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Rausher, M.D. 2001. Co-evolution and plant resistance to natural enemies. Nature, 411: 857864.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saunders, J.L. 1969. Occurrence and control of the balsam twig aphid on Abies grandis and A. concolor . Journal of Economic Entomology, 62: 11061109.Google Scholar
Serbezov, D., Bernatchez, L., Olsen, E.M., and Vøllestad, L.A. 2010. Quantitative genetic parameters for wild stream‐living brown trout: heritability and parental effects. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 23: 16311641.Google Scholar
Strong, D.R., Larsson, S., and Gullberg, U. 1993. Heritability of host plant resistance to herbivory changes with gallmidge density during an outbreak on willow. Evolution, 47: 291300.Google Scholar
Verrez, A., Quiring, D., Leinekugel Le Cocq, T., Adams, G., and Sung Park, Y. 2010. Genetically based resistance to the white pine weevil in jack pine and eastern white pine. The Forestry Chronicle, 86: 775779.Google Scholar
White, T.L., Adams, W.T., and Neale, D.B. 2007. Forest genetics. CABI Publishing, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Zas, R., Sampedro, L., Prada, E., and Fernández-López, J. 2005. Genetic variation of Pinus pinaster Ait. seedlings in susceptibility to the pine weevil Hylobius abietis L. Annals of Forest Science, 62: 681688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar