Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T22:33:14.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE GALÁPAGOS ISLANDS’ GENUS NEORYCTES ARROW (COLEOPTERA: SCARABAEIDAE: DYNASTINAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Joyce Cook ,
H.F. Howden  and
S.B. Peck
Joyce Cook
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1S 5B6
H.F. Howden
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1S 5B6
S.B. Peck
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1S 5B6
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The endemic Galápagos’ genus Neoryctes Arrow has had a confused nomenclatorial and taxonomic history. Evaluation of morphological variation in the 41 specimens now available confirms the distinctiveness of the genus and establishes the existence of four species, each restricted to a single island. The original Darwin specimen, named Oryctes galapagoensis by G.R. Waterhouse in 1845, is shown to be from Isla Santiago. Two other names are valid: N. linelli Mutchler for the population on San Cristobal and N. moreti Dechambre for the one on Santa Cruz. The population on Floreana is named as a new species, N. williamsi. Neoryctes most likely originated from a Pentodontini dynastine ancestor from lowland South or Central America. The ancestor first dispersed to Isla San Cristobal, one of the oldest islands. It is hypothesized that before hindwing reduction occurred, which is now characteristic of all members of the genus, individuals from San Cristobal spread to the other islands. Subsequently, possibly during periods of Pleistocene aridity, each population became restricted to its present range in the moist highland zone of an individual island.

Résumé

L’histoire de la taxonomie et de la nomenclature du genre Neoryctes Arrow, endémique dans les îles Galápagos, est plutôt confuse. L’évaluation de la variation morphologique chez les 41 spécimens disponibles a confirmé la validité du genre et permis d’affirmer l’existence de quatre espèces, chacune restreinte à une seule île. Le spécimen original de Darwin, nommé Oryctes galapagoensis par G.R. Waterhouse en 1845, provient de l’île Santiago. Deux autres noms sont valides : N. linelli Mutchler, qui désigne la population de San Cristobal, et N. moreti Dechambre, celle de Santa Cruz. La population de Floreana appartient à une espèce nommée ici, N. williamsi sp.nov. Neoryctes descend probablement d’un dynastiné de la tribu des Pentodontini des basses terres d’Amérique du Sud ou d’Amérique centrale. L’espèce d’origine s’est dispersée d’abord dans l’île de San Cristobal, l’une des plus vieilles îles. On peut supposer qu’avant la réduction des ailes postérieures, qui caractérise toutes les espèces actuelles du genre, des individus de San Cristobal ont colonisé d’autres îles. Par la suite, peut-être au cours des périodes d’aridité du Pléistocène, chaque population s’est vue restreinte à sa répartition actuelle dans les terres hautes humides d’une île en particulier.

[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 127 , Issue 2 , April 1995 , pp. 177 - 193
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arrow, G.J. 1908. A contribution to the classification of the coleopterous family Dynastidae. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London 1908(2): 321–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowden, J., and Johnson, C.G.. 1976. Migrating and other terrestrial insects at sea. pp. 97–117in Cheng, L. (Ed.), Marine Insects. North-Holland Publ., Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Colinvaux, P.A., and Schofield, E.K.. 1976. Historical ecology in the Galápagos Islands. Journal of Ecology 64: 989–1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darlington, P.J. Jr., 1943. Carabidae of mountains and islands: Data on the evolution of isolated faunas, and on atrophy of wings. Ecological Monographs 13: 39–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Decelle, J. 1976. Dynastinae (Coleoptera Scarabaeoidea Melolonthidae) récoltés aux Îles Galapagos par N. et J. Leleup. pp. 269–272in Mission Zoologique Belge aux Îles Galapagos et en Ecuador (N. et J. Leleup, 1964–1965). Koninklijk Museum voor Midden-Afrika, Tervuren.Google Scholar
Dechambre, R.-P. 1991. Mise au point taxonomique sur le genre Neoryctes Arrow (Coleoptera. Dynastidae). Bulletin de la Société Sciences Naturelles 69: 7–8.Google Scholar
Dechambre, R.-P. 1992. Note complémentaire sur Neoryctes moreti Dechambre (Coleoptera, Dynastidae). Bulletin de la Société Sciences Naturelles 73: 21.Google Scholar
Desender, K., Baert, L., and Maelfait, J.-P.. 1992. Distribution and speciation of carabid beetles in the Galápagos Archipelago (Ecuador). Bulletin de l'Institut Royale des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, Entomologie 62: 57–65.Google Scholar
Dirsch, V.M. 1969. Acridoidea of the Galapagos Islands (Orthoptera). Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Entomology 23: 27–51.Google Scholar
Endrödi, S. 1969. Monographie der Dynastinae, 4. Tribus: Pentodontini (Coleoptera, Lamellicornia), 1. Amerikanische Pentodontini. Entomologische Abhandlungen Staatliches Museum für Tierkunde in Dresden 37: 1–145.Google Scholar
Endrödi, S. 1985. The Dynastinae of the World. Dr. W. Junk, London. Series Entomologica 28: 1–800.Google Scholar
Franz, H. 1985. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Koleopterenfauna der Galapagos-Inseln. Springer-Verlag, Wien/New York.Google Scholar
Futuyma, D.J. 1986. Evolutionary Biology, 2nd ed. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA.Google ScholarPubMed
Grant, P.R. 1986. Ecology and Evolution of Darwin's Finches. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Hebard, M. 1920. Expedition of the California Academy of Sciences to the Galapagos Islands, 1905–1906. XVII. Dermaptera and Orthoptera. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences ser. 4, 2: 311–346.Google Scholar
Howden, H.F. 1977. Beetles, beach drift, and island biogeography. Biotropica 9: 53–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linell, M.L. 1898. On the coleopterous insects of the Galapagos Islands. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 21: 249–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linsley, E.G., and Usinger, R.L.. 1966. Insects of the Galapagos Islands. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences 33: 113–196.Google Scholar
Lumaret, J.-P. 1991. Le genre Neoryctes Arrow, 1808: Description de la larve et position taxonomique du genre (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea: Dynastidae: Pentodontini). Elytron 5: 337–341.Google Scholar
Maddison, W.P., and Maddison, D.R.. 1992. MacClade: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution. Version 3.0. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
Mutchler, A.J. 1924. Coleoptera from the Williams Galapagos Expedition. Zoologica 5: 219–240.Google Scholar
Mutchler, A.J. 1938. Coleoptera from the Galapagos Islands. American Museum Novitates 981: 1–19.Google Scholar
Peck, S.B. 1994 a. Aerial dispersal of insects between and to islands in the Galápagos Archipelago, Ecuador. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 87: 218–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peck, S.B. 1994 b. Sea-surface (pleuston) transport of insects in the Galápagos Archipelago, Ecuador. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 87: 576–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peck, S.B., and Kukalová-Peck, J.. 1990. Origin and biogeography of the beetles (Coleoptera) of the Galápagos Archipelago, Ecuador. Canadian Journal of Zoology 68: 1617–1638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, D.M. 1979. Endemism and evolution in Galapagos Islands vascular plants. pp. 225–256in Bramwell, D. (Ed.), Plants and Islands. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Prell, H. 1936. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Dynastinen. Entomologische Blatter 32(4): 145–152.Google Scholar
Ride, W.D.L., Sabrosky, C.W., Bernardi, G., and Melville, R.V. (Eds.). 1985. International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, 3rd ed. International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature in Association with British Museum (Natural History). University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
Roff, D.A. 1990. The evolution of flightlessness in insects. Ecological Monographs 60: 389–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, D.E. 1975. A vicariance model of Caribbean biogeography. Systematic Zoology 24: 431–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharp, D. 1873. Description de nouveaux genres et de nouvelles espèces de coléoptères lamellicornes. Revue et Magasin de Zoologie, Ser. 3, 1: 262–273.Google Scholar
Simkin, T. 1984. Geology of Galápagos islands. pp. 15–41in Perry, R. (Ed.), Key Environments: Galápagos. Pergamon Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar
Slevin, J.R. 1931. Log of the Schooner “Academy” on a Voyage of Scientific Research to the Galápagos Islands. Occasional Papers of the California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
Smith, A.G. 1966. Land snails of the Galápagos. pp. 240–251in Bowman, R.I. (Ed.), The Galápagos. Proceedings of the Symposium of the Galápagos International Scientific Project, January 7 and 8, 1964, Berkeley, California. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stirling, E.C. 1891. Description of a new genus and species of Marsupialia, “Notoryctes typhlops”. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia 14: 154–187.Google Scholar
Sulloway, F.J. 1984. Darwin and the Galápagos. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 21: 29–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dyke, E.C. 1953. The Coleoptera of the Galápagos Islands. Occasional Papers of the California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
Waterhouse, G.R. 1845. Descriptions of coleopterous insects collected by Charles Darwin, Esq., in the Galapagos Islands. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 16: 19–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, J.W. 1983. The evolution and biogeography of the lizards of the Galápagos Archipelago: Evolutionary genetics of Phyllodactylus and Tropidurus populations. pp. 123–155in Bowman, R.I., Berson, M., and Leviton, A.E. (Eds.), Patterns of Evolution in Galápagos Organisms. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Pacific Division, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar