Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-09T07:02:53.847Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

DESCRIPTIONS OF THREE NEW SPECIES IN THE GENERA AMBLYSEIUS BERLESE AND TYPHLODROMUS SCHEUTEN (ACARINA: PHYTOSEIIDAE) IN CANADA, WITH DESCRIPTIONS OF MALES OF NINE OTHER SPECIES, AND SOME NEW COLLECTION RECORDS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

D. A. Chant  and
E. Yoshida Shaul
D. A. Chant
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A1
E. Yoshida Shaul
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A1
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Three new species, two in the genus Amblyseius Berlese and one in the genus Typhlodromus Scheuten, collected in Canada are described. Three additional Amblyseius species and one Typhlodromus species are recorded for the first time in Canada. The previously unknown males of 9 species are described. These new records bring the total numbers of species in the genera Amblyseius and Typhlodromus in Canada to 53 and 22 respectively.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 110 , Issue 10 , October 1978 , pp. 1059 - 1076
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arutunyan, E. S. 1971. New species of the genus Typhlodromus Scheuten, 1857 (Parasitiformes, Phytoseiidae). (In Russian.) Proc. Armenian Acad. Sci. 52(5): 305–308.Google Scholar
Athias-Henriot, C. 1958. Phytoseiidae et Aceosejidae (Acarina, Gamasina) l'Algérie. II. Phytoseiidae clé des genres, genres Amblyseius Berlese (suite) et Seiulus Berlese. Bull. Soc. Hist. Nat. Afrique Nord 49: 23–43.Google Scholar
Athias-Henriot, C. 1960. Phytoseiidae et Aceosejidae (Acarina, Gamasina) d'Algérie. IV. Genre Typhlodromus Scheuten, 1857. Bull. Soc. Hist. Nat. Afrique Nord 51: 62–107.Google Scholar
Athias-Henriot, C. 1966. Contribution à l'étude des Amblyseius paléarctiques (Acariens anactinotriches, Phytoseiidae). Bull. Sci. Bourgogne 24: 181–230.Google Scholar
Berlese, A. 1914. Acari Nuovi. Redia 10(1): 113–150.Google Scholar
Buchelos, T. C. and Pritchard, A. E.. 1960. Amblyseius similoides, a new predacious mite from California. Pan-Pacif. Ent. 36(4): 179–182.Google Scholar
Chant, D. A. 1957. Descriptions of some phytoseiid mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Part. I. Nine new species from British Columbia with keys to the species of British Columbia. Can. Ent. 89: 289–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chant, D. A. 1959. Phytoseiid mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Part II. A taxonomic review of the family Phytoseiidae, with descriptions of 38 new species. Can. Ent. 91(Suppl. 12): 45–164.Google Scholar
Chant, D. A. and Hansell, R. I. C.. 1971. The genus Amblyseius (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) in Canada and Alaska. Can. J. Zool. 49(5): 703–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chant, D. A., Hansell, R. I. C., and Yoshida, E.. 1974. The genus Typhlodromus Scheuten (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) in Canada and Alaska. Can. J. Zool. 52(10): 1265–1291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschmann, W. 1962. Acarologie. Gansystematik der Parasitiformes. Teil 5. Gamasiden. Fürth/Bay. 56 pp.Google Scholar
Koch, C. L. 1839. Deutschlands Crustacean, Myriapoden, und Arachniden. Regensburg.Google Scholar
Ragusa, S. 1977. Notes on phytoseiid mites in Sicily with a description of a new species of Typhlodromus (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Acarologia 18(3): 379–392.Google Scholar
Rowell, H. J., Chant, D. A., and Hansell, R. I. C.. 1978. The determination of setal homologies and setal patterns on the dorsal shield in the family Phytoseiidae (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Can. Ent. 110: 859–876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Specht, H. B. 1968. Phytoseiidae (Acarina: Mesostigmata) in the New Jersey apple orchard environment with descriptions of spermathecae and three new species. Can. Ent. 100(7): 673–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swirski, E. and Ragusa, S.. 1976. Notes on predaceous mites of Greece, with descriptions of five new species (Mesostigmata: Phytoseiidae). Phytoparasitica 4(2): 101–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wainstein, B. A. and Shcherbak, G. I.. 1972. Gamaside species of the genus Amblyseius Berlese, 1904 (Parasitiformes, Phytoseiidae) new for the Ukrainian fauna. (In Russian.) Vest. Zool. No. 6, pp. 35–44.Google Scholar
Westerboer, I. and Bernhard, F.. 1963. Die Familie Phytoseiidae Berlese 1916. pp. 451–791, in Stammer, H. J. (Ed.), Beiträge zur Systematik und Ökologie Mitteleuropäischer Acarina. Band II. Mesostigmata 1. Akad. Verl. Ges., Leipzig.Google Scholar