Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g78kv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T23:29:17.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

CYCLE BIOLOGIQUE DE PISSODES NOTATUS (COLEOPTERA, CURCULIONIDAE) DANS LA REGION TOULOUSAINE (FRANCE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Claude Alauzet
Affiliation:
Université P. Sabatier, Faculté des Sciences, C.E.A.R.N., Laboratoire d'Entomologie, Toulouse, France

Abstract

The maximal emergence of Pissodes notatus (F.) adults takes place during July and August. It results from the different evolution of two populations:

— a first population, whose complete development (from egg to adult) takes 11 or 12 months. This population corresponds to eggs laid after the middle of July (maximum egg laying during September). Most of the larvae having reached the third instar, it shows no more evolution during the winter; the further development takes place during the next spring, and adults emerge from mid-June to mid-July.

— a second population resulting from egg laying, between February and July, of hibernated adults (maximum egg laying during April and May). The whole development being very short (2 to 3 months), the adults, corresponding to these eggs, emerge from the middle of July to the end of August.

The observed differences between durations of the under-bark development (from 2 to 12 months) appear free of diapause and probably result from rates of development changing with temperature and instar.

In our regional field temperature conditions, all the individuals reach finally their under-bark development approximatively at the same time, so that the adult emergence period takes place in July and August.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliographie sommaire

Alauzet, C. 1969. Importance relative du rôle du Coléoptère Curculionide Pissodes notatus et de la rouille Cronartium flaccidum dans la mortalité des pins maritimes de la forêt domaniale de Bouconne (Hte Garonne). C. r. Soc. Biol. 163(5): 12211223.Google Scholar
Alauzet, C. 1972. Mise en évidence d'un stade de repos facultatif dans le développement de Pissodes notatus (F.) (Col. Curculionidae) dans la nature. Bull. Soc. Hist. nat. Toulouse 108(3–4): 514519.Google Scholar
Alauzet, Cl., Larroche, D. et Torossian, Cl.. 1971. Étude du dépérissement des pins maritimes dans la forêt domaniale de Bouconne (Hte Garonne). C. r. 96ème Congr. nat. Sociétés Savantes: 373379. Bibliothèque nationale, Paris.Google Scholar
Bhattacharya, C. G. 1967. A simple method of resolution into gaussian components. Biometrics 23: 115135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burkzeyeva, O. N. 1965. Duration of generations of the weevil Pissodes notatus (F.) (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) in the voronezh region. Ent. Obozr. U.R.S.S. 44: 2224.Google Scholar
Carle, P. 1967. Contribution à l'étude biologique de Pissodes notatus (F.) (Col., Curculionidae). Rev. Zool. Agr. Appl. 10–12: 139151.Google Scholar
Carle, P. 1968. Le dépérissement du pin maritime dans le Var. Epidemiologie. Symptomatologie. Cause primaire. Rev. Forest. Franc. 3: 185203.Google Scholar
Carle, P. 1971. Les phénomènes présidant aux successions d'insectes dans le dépérissement du pin maritime du Var. Ann. Zoo. Ecol. animal (n° hors série): 177192.Google Scholar
Carle, P. et Gayraud, Y.. 1971. Essais de lutte chimique contre le charançon du pin Pissodes notatus Fabr. (Col. curculionidae). Phytiatrie. Phytopharm. 20: 239248.Google Scholar
Ressouches, A. P. 1969. Premières observations sur le développement embryonnaire de Pissodes notatus F. (Col. Curculionidae). C. r. Acad. Sci., Paris 269: 1911994.Google Scholar
Romanyk, N. 1960. Dos cuculionidos peligrosos de las repoblaciones de pino. Bol. Serv. Plagas For.: 147158.Google Scholar